Cases

Cite as 2020 Ark. 32 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-18-662 Opinion Delivered: January 23, 2020 JOE PERRY, JR. APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE CHICOT V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 0

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge. Perry Munson (Munson) appeals the termination of his parental rights to six children in a proceeding initiated by the Rush County Department of Public Welfare (DPW). We reverse and remand. Munson and his ex-wife were married in the early 1970’s and their marriage produced six children by 1980. Munson had developed a drug and alcohol dependency which began wh

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0282p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, -

ROBERTS, J. This is an appeal of a final order of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). In that order, DEP dismissed as untimely a petition filed by property owner James Hasselback challenging DEP’s issuance of a coastal construction control line permit on an adjacent property. DEP provided written notice of the issuance of the permit to Rick Barnett, another adjacent property owner, and the Oertel Law Firm, whic

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. In these two appeals, Plaintiff-Appellant Ronald Wolfe, Jr. (“Junior”) challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendanb-Appellee, Detective Alan Perry (“Perry”) as well as the district court’s award of attorney fees to Defendants-Appellees Perry, Sheriffs Deputy Ivan Deering (“Deering”), and As

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 894 [1] OPINION [2] The appellant, Melvin Tyrone Perry, was tried by jury and convicted of First Degree Murder (21 O.S. 1981 § 701.7[21-701.7](B)), Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon (21 O.S.Supp. 1982 § 801[21-801]), Kidnapping

Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. In California, an individual with a disability who is between 18 and 22 years of age and has not yet earned a regular high school diploma is entitled to continue to receive special education and related services, even while incarcerated in a county jail, so long as certain prerequisites have been satisfied. (Ed. Code, § 56040, sub

[Cite as Cline v. New Lexington, 2015-Ohio-3727.] COURT OF APPEALS PERRY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RICHARD LEE CLINE, JR. JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. John W. Wise, J.

BAZELON, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in the result: In view of the compelling legitimate reason for the defendant’s action, the record does not support the finding that retaliation was a “substantial” 1 cause of dismissal. I therefore join in the court’s judgment. I am not prepared, however, to agree with two problematic propositions of law unnecessary to the result. <

Egan Jr., J. Cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Córtese, J.), entered October 30, 2009 in Montgomery County, granting, among other things, plaintiff a divorce and primary physical custody of the parties’ child to defendant, upon a decision of the court. Plaintiff (hereinafter the father) and defendant (hereinafter the mother) were married in 2004 and are the parents of a daughter (born in 2007)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Milton I. Shadur, Senior United States District Judge Acting as subrogee of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (‘Canon’), Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America (‘Sompo Japan’) filed this action against B&H Freight, Inc. (‘B&H Freight’), B&H Systems, Inc. (‘B&H Systems’) and Midwest Star Group, Inc. (‘Midwest Star') under 49 U.S.C. § 14706,1 part

OPINION PER CURIAM: When a student between the ages of 18 and 22 who is eligible for special education services in California is incarcerated in a county jail, who pays the cost of those services? The school district of the student’s parent’s residence? The county in which the jail is located? The State of California? To find out, we certified a question of California law — -specifically, the interpretati

694 N.E.2d 665 (1998) 296 Ill. App.3d 192 230 Ill.Dec. 696 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel B. DOUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-97-0582. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. May 4, 1998. *666 Charles M. Schiedel, Deputy Defender (Court-a

Donald L. Corbin, Justice. Appellants Michele and Tracy Edgin filed a negligence action against AppeEee Entergy Operations, Inc., for injuries that Michele Edgin sustained while working at Entergy’s nuclear plant in London as a security guard. During the time she was working at the nuclear plant, Michele Edgin was employed by the Wackenhut Corporation. AppeEants appeal the order of the Pope County Circuit

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION UPON DENIAL OF REHEARING: JUSTICE STEIGMANN delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant filed a petition for rehearing in which (1) he chailenges this court’s statement that he waived two issues on appeal— namely, that the trial court erred by not considering Treatment Alternatives for Special Clients (TASC

41 F.Supp.2d 172 (1999) James BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Daniel G. MIDDAUGH, Individually and as Sheriff of Oneida County, New York; M. Peter Paravati, Individually and as Undersheriff of Oneida County, New York; Lt. Roy Meyers, Individually and as an employee of the Sheriff's Department of Oneida County, New York; Lt. William Chappell, Individually and as an employee of the Sheriff's Department of Oneida County, New York; Sgt. Meyers, Individually and

805 F.Supp. 1073 (1992) HOTEL SYRACUSE, INC. and Joseph M. Murphy, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas YOUNG, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Syracuse, C. Frank Harrigan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Corporation Counsel of the City of Syracuse, City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, Syracuse Economic Development Corporation, the City of Syracuse, and Does 1 Through 50, Defendants.

AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW APPROVING FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS James A. Parker, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On September 30, 2015, the Court granted preliminary approval of the final settlement agreement (FSA) (Doc. No. 1306-1) in this class action and ordered that notice be sent to all class members. See ORDER GRANTI

Appellate Case: 22-2004 Document: 010110799219 Date Filed: 01/18/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 18, 2023