Cases

PROCEDURAL HISTORY LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Daniel Snyder was convicted of felony leaving the scene of an accident. The Jackson County Circuit Court sentenced Snyder to six years, with five years suspended, one year to serve in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, and five years’ postrelease supervision. Snyd

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge This case is back before the court on a motion by Defendants the U.S. Parole Commission and its individual Commissioners (collectively, "Defendant" or "the Commission"), to reconsider the court's decision of February 13, 2018. See Mem. Op., ECF No. 99. That decision concerned a motion by Plaintiffs-individuals who remain incarcerated for D.C. Code offenses that occurred on or befo

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge Plaintiffs in this matter are D.C. Code offenders who remain incarcerated for serious felonies committed before March 3, 1985. Plaintiffs brought this action challenging the United States Parole Commission's practice of applying to Plaintiffs' parole eligibility determinations the Commission's regulations that were adopted in 2000, instead of the 1972 guidelines of the now-defunct District

Opinion filed January 16, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-17-00335-CR ___________ ROY DANIEL GARZA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 161st District Court

ORDER LEONARD DAVIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Plaintiff ROY-G-BIV Corporation’s (“ROY-G-BIV”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 362); ROY-G-BIV’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding ABB’s OPC-Related Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Docket No. 366); Defendants ABB Inc. (“ABB”), Meadwestvaco Texas, LP, and Meadwest

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: One feature that makes this case quite easy is that, although the district court did not affirmatively determine that Wilson’s possession of the firearms was in connection with a felony (possession of the marijuana with intent to distribute), Wilson’s own position on the matter compelled that conclusion. His sole “defense” against the enhancement was that while he

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: One feature that makes this case quite easy is that, although the district court did not affirmatively determine that Wilson’s possession of the firearms was in connection with a felony (possession of the marijuana with intent to distribute), Wilson’s own position on the matter compelled that conclusion. His sole “defense” against the enhancement was that while he

571 S.E.2d 631 (2002) STATE of North Carolina v. Alvino Rae WILSON, Jr. No. COA01-1559. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 19, 2002. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Daniel P. O'Brien, for the State. Appellate Defender Staples S. Hughes, by Assistant Appellate Defender Barbara S. Blackman, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM: Daniel Siebert appeals from the dismissal of his petitions for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although his case reaches us some eleven years after he first sought collateral review of his convictions and sentences of death, the courts have to date determined only that he is subject to procedural bars and therefore have never

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROY MITCHELL EDMONDSON, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2025-1468-LWW DANIEL OAKES, ANDREW SMITH, JACQUELINE COMERFORD, REMKO DE JONG, TELIPORTER HOLDINGS LTD., TELIPORTER OVERLAY INC., Defendants, TELIPORTER (US) INC. (n/k/a FANBOX EXPERIENCE INC.), Nominal Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Date

7ermont Superior Court Filed 07/18/24 Rutland Unit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Rutland Unit

809 F.Supp. 517 (1992) Nancy ROY, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE, Board Steve Kerr, Chair Winston Roy, Sherry Daniels, and Bobby Bernard, Defendants. No. C91-0080-BG(H). United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Bowling Green Division. December 30, 1992. *518 Edward E. Dove, Lexington, KY, for plaintiff.

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and PINSON, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

[Cite as Pike v. Wilson, 2023-Ohio-814.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA KENNETH PIKE, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : No. 111688 v. : PETER W. WILSON, ET AL., :

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. The plaintiffs are federal inmates who alleged that the U.S. Parole Commission violated the Ex Post Facto Clause in making parole decisions by applying the 2000 parole guidelines rather than the 1972 parole regulations that were in place at the time each plaintiff was sentenced. The plaintiffs also alleged that they were denied fa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ROY A. DANIEL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 10-cv-00862 (APM)

Case: 22-50998 Document: 273-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 13, 2024 No. 22-50998

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) ROY A. DANIEL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-862 (RWR) ) ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________

State of Maryland v. Darrayl John Wilson, No. 64, September Term, 2019 WITNESS TAMPERING – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE – SPOUSAL TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGE – MERGER – Court of Appeals held that, where person married potential witness for State with intent to have witness invoke spousal testimonial privilege to prevent witness from testifying at criminal proceeding, evidence was sufficient to support convictions for witness tampering and obstruction of justice. Consistent with holding in Romans v. State,