Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Lopez-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant por

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. We deny Rony Lopez-Lopez's petition for review because there was substantial evidence before the IJ and BIA that Lopez-Lopez had failed to meet his burden to establish a nexus between his alleged persecution and a statutorily protected ground. In April 2013, the Department of Homeland Security served Lopez-Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatem

Affirmed and Opinion Filed April 26, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00970-CV JUAN GOMEZ LOPEZ AND KENIA ITZEL VALLE MATA, Appellants V. FLUOR CORPORATION, FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., AND FLUOR DANIEL MEXICO, S.A., Appellees On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 27, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00970-CV JUAN GOMEZ LOPEZ AND KENIA ITZEL VALLE MATA, Appellants V. FLUOR CORPORATION, FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., AND FLUOR DANIEL MEXICO, S.A., Appellees On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Cou

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Daniel Lopez-Linares has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Linares has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about October 25, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against the Lopez defendants (defendants) and denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or for a traverse hearing, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about October 25, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against the Lopez defendants (defendants) and denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or for a traverse hearing, unanimously reversed, on the law, w

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HILDA TAGLE, Senior District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED, that on March 23, 2015, the Court considered Defendant’s *850Motion and Memorandum in Support for [sic] Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 51; Plaintiff Daniel G. Lopez’s Brief in Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 53; and Defendant’s Re

PER CURIAM. Omar Y. Lopez ("Lopez") appeals the judgment of the trial court following a trial de novo on his small claims petition against Michael Garrett ("Garrett"). The trial court entered judgment in favor of Garrett. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 22, 2015, and a judgment of the same court (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered February 16, 2016, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence no

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered on or about January 16, 2014, said appeal *603 having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessiv

MCFADDEN, Judge. After a jury trial, Salvador Lopez was convicted of aggravated stalking for violating a restraining order for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the victim by following her to her home and calling the police to stop her vehicle. He appeals, challenging the admission of testimony from the victim concerning prior acts of violence and the effectiveness of hi

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,120-02 IN RE DANIEL LOPEZ, Relator ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 15-CR-3266-H & 15-CR-3995-H IN THE 347TH DISTRICT COURT FROM NUECES COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a wr

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1318 OPINION Imran Q. appeals from the juvenile court's order that he pay $17,958.13 in restitution to Joseph Iaquinto. We remand this matter to the juvenile court for it to recalculate the restitution amount. *Page 1319 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered May 8, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three to six years, unanimously affirmed. *626The court properly declined to submit to the jury the issue of whether a prosecution witness was an accomplice, who

*18Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice SCALIA and by him referred to the Court denied. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would vote to grant the motion for l

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. Law enforcement officers detained and frisked defendant-appellant Fausto Lopez after observing him and his brother load paper bags into Lopez's garage. The officer who ordered the stop had a "hunch" that the bags contained drug-trafficking contraband. That hunch was wrong. It had been based on a tip the officers had obtained the previous night from an informant

OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiffs Otto J. Reich, a former ambassador to Venezuela, and his consulting company, Otto Reich Associates, LLC (“ORA”), allege that the activities of the defendants caused injury to their property and reputation. Plaintiffs bring claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c-d) (“RICO”), as well as c

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered May 8, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three to six years, unanimously affirmed. *626The court properly declined to submit to the jury the issue of whether a prosecution witness was an accomplice, who