Cases

20-2056 Hassoun v. Searls In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-2056-cv ADHAM AMIN HASSOUN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. JEFFREY SEARLS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING ASSISTANT FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE BUFFALO F

20-2056-cv Hassoun v. Searls In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2019 No. 20-2056-cv ADHAM AMIN HASSOUN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. JEFFREY SEARLS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING ASSISTANT FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE BUFFALO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2021 Term FILED November 19, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUP

FILED July 30, 2025 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGI

FILED October 22, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

FILED October 22, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF

FILED June 10, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2022 Term June 8, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREM

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge In this adversary proceeding, the plaintiff, Vera Lee, a creditor of the defendant, Jane Daniel, the debtor in the main case, has moved for summary judgment on all counts of her four-count complaint. Ms. Lee seeks a judgment that the debt owed to her by Ms. Daniel be excepted from discharge under

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1543 Filed October 2, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DANIEL FLETCHER JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt, Judge. A defendant appeals his convictions for murder, robbery, and burglary. AFFIRMED. Jamie

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Martin, J.), dated November 14, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendant John Newman to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) insofar as asserted against him and those branches of the separate motion of the defendants D

error to the Lucas Appeals.

Motion by plaintiff to dispense with printing record, and if motion is not allowed, for extension of 30 days after decision of motion to print record. Overruled as to dispensing with printing, and allowed as to extension of time.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 106 DECISION Raising two assignments of error, plaintiffs-appellants Douglas and Sandy Daniel appeal from the order of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Fisons Corporation on the products-liability claims

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. This is a class action for damages based upon alleged violation of anti-fraud provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. Jurisdiction is based upon 15 U. S.C. § 78aa. The plaintiffs were shareholders in an Ohio corporation named Certified Mortgage

418 F.3d 1349 Daniel J. CAPON, Arthur Weiss, Brian A. Irving, Margo R. Roberts, and Krisztina Zsebo, Appellants,v.Zelig ESHHAR, Daniel Schindler, Tova Waks, and Gideon Gross, Cross-Appellants,v.Jon Dudas, Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor. No. 03-1480. No. 03-1481. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Appellant, C. W. Daniel, sued Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, of Alabama, a corporation, upon counts for false imprisonment and counts for malicious prosecution. Upon the trial the court gave the affirmative charge for defendant upon the counts for false imprisonment and refused such charge as to counts for malicious prosecution. There was verdict for defendant. Appellant presents for review the giving of the affirmative charge on the false imprisonment counts. Appellee in

MAYER, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1] We shall not again review the testimony bearing on the questions as to whether or not the road and crossing were a public highway and a public crossing, or the additional testimony presented on this trial. We think the additional testimony added.nothing as matter of law, and that the sole question which should have been sent to the jury was that

MANTON, Circuit Judge (dissenting). The highway or road, over which the deceased was proceeding, leads from the state highway in Lyndon, and crosses the railroad tracks just before reaching an electric light plant owned and operated by the village of Lyndon-ville. The deceased and a fellow workman were employed by the village at the electric light plant, and in the performance of their duties drove across the tracks with an auto

This bill for the construction of the sixth clause of the will and a portion of the codicil thereto of the late Daniel L.D. Granger has been certified to this court for a final decree under the provisions of Gen. Laws, 1909, cap. 289, § 35. The petitioners are the executors and trustees thereunder, and desire a construction of the provisions aforesaid and the instructions of the court thereupon, with reference to contingencies which can not arise during the lifetime of Grace Grang