Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Danielle Rene Martin”
Martin v. National Union Fire Insurancepublic domain
COOKS, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Lorita Johnson, Et Al. v. Samuel Templeton, Et Al., Docket No. 99-1274, 768 So.2d 65, rendered this same day, the judgment of the trial court is reversed. REVERSED.
Gros v. St. Martin Parish Sewerage District 1public domain
YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons assigned in Gaspard v. St. Martin Parish Sewerage District # 1, et al., 569 So.2d 1083 (La.App. 3d Cir.1990), the judgment of the trial court is reversed and set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with *1086this opinion. The sewerage district will pay the costs of this appeal.
Renaud v. Martin Marietta Corp.public domain
749 F.Supp. 1545 (1990) James Earl RENAUD and Kathy Renaud, individually and as parents and next friends of Jennifer Lynn Renaud and Michelle Danniel Renaud, minors; Jack Patterson and Sharon Patterson, individually and as parents and next friends of Shane Patterson, a minor, and heirs-at-law of Hapi Patterson, deceased; Jack Morningstar and Susan Morningstar, individually and as parents and next friends of Craig Allen Morningstar and Kevin Hay Morningst
04/23/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 7, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARLANDO SHUNTELL STURGHILL and XAVIER TALIK-RASHOD MARTIN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 17-237 Kyle C. Atkins, Judge
Super98, LLC v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.public domain
HONORABLE LEIGH MARTIN MAY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1371This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Super98, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment [59]. After due consideration, the Court enters the following Order: I. BACKGROUND1 On September 24, 2014, the pa
State of Tennessee v. Quadarius Deshun Martinpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. QUADARIUS DESHUN MARTIN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 15135 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2015-01095-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 22, 2016 The Defendant, Quadarius Deshun Martin, was convicted by a Madison County jury of two counts of aggravated
SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE WYOMING SUPREME COURT January 6, 2026 State v. Johnson, No. S-24-0326, 2026 WY 1 This summary is intended to help the public understand the main points of the decision. It does not modify, supplement, or change the content of the Court’s opinion, or that of the specially concurring and dissenting opinions, and it should not be cited or relied on as legal precedent. Case Background In
Cartin v. Harrisonpublic domain
567 S.E.2d 174 (2002) Daniel B. CARTIN, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Shuford Edward HARRISON and wife, Renee Edmiston Harrison, Defendants. No. COA01-820. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 6, 2002. *175 Di Santi Watson & Capua, by Anthony S. di Santi and Andrea N. Capua, Boone, for plaintiff-appellees. McElwee Firm, PLL
OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Sergio Rene Sanchez Araujo, Lorena Armida Beltran Juarez, and Grupo Pro-motor Setresa S. de RL. de C.V. (hereinafter, “Appellees”) sued Master Capital Solutions Corp. (hereinafter, “Master Capital”) and two other parties 1 for failing to fund a p
Martin Israel Soto v. Tiffany Renee Danielspublic domain
SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, P. J., GOBEIL and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules December
530 F.Supp.2d 198 (2008) NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 86-3454(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 15, 2008. *199 Meredith Fuchs, The National Security Archive, David L. Sobel, Kate Abbott Martin, Sonia Renee Jarvis, Washington, DC, f
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-24-00761-CV Rafael CISNEROS and Sofia Nanez, Appellants v. Humberto LEAL, Yvonne Leal, and Samuel Rene Ramos,
Peterson v. Reynapublic domain
920 S.W.2d 288 (1996) Sandra PETERSON, Petitioner, v. Juan Villegas REYNA and Howard Shadrock, individually and d/b/a Shadrock Trucking Company, Respondents. No. 95-1123. Supreme Court of Texas. April 12, 1996. Daniel J.T. Sciano, Ronald J. Salazar, San Antonio, for Petitioner. W. Wendell Hall, Rene A. Forinash, Edward T. Hecker, Terrence J. Martin, San Anton
932 F.2d 1572 60 USLW 2120, 20 Fed.R.Serv.3d 754, RICOBus.Disp.Guide 7789 Tony AVIRGAN and Martha Honey, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.John HULL, Adolfo Calero, Robert Owen, John K. Singlaub,Ronald Joseph Martin, Sr., James McCoy, Rafael "Chi Chi"Quintero, Mario Delamico, Thomas Clines, Theodore Shackley,Albert Hakim and Richard Secord, Defendants-Appellees,Bruce Jones, et al., Defendants.Tony
MARTIN, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences as to counts 12 and 13 of Interference No. 90,599, which counts were awarded to Robbins and Corrado on the ground of lack of support by Higonnet and Moy-roud. Counts 12 and 13 are modified claims 47 and 48 of Robbins and Cor
Ayotte v. Boeing Co.public domain
Chief Judge Rubén Castillo *1070Daniel L. Ayotte ("Plaintiff") filed this action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, alleging claims against a host of defendants, including The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), arising from his exposure to asbestos. (R. 1-1, Compl.) Boeing removed the action to this Court. (R. 1, Notice of Removal.) Before the Court is Plaintiff'
People v. Granadopublic domain
22 Cal.App.4th 194 (1994) 27 Cal. Rptr.2d 286 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RENE GRANADO, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. F018887. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. February 3, 1994. *197 COUNSEL David S. Rugendorf, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant
Roberts v. Statepublic domain
Deen, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I must respectfully dissent to the majority opinion. The trial transcript reveals that defense counsel was permitted at the close of voir dire to ask the entire array of prospective jurors the following question: “In your opinion would a white police officer be more likely *810to tell the truth than a black defendant,
OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. This is a consolidated appeal. In Case Nos. 01-1499 and 01-1866, Appellant, Renee Hansmann, appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee, the Estate of Irone Pavan (“the Estate”), awarding the proceeds of Irone Pavan’s employer-sponsored stock investment plan to the Estate. In Case Nos. 01-1500 and 01-1868, Han-smann appeals from the d
People v. Walshpublic domain
652 N.E.2d 1102 (1995) 273 Ill. App.3d 453 210 Ill.Dec. 126 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel WALSH a/k/a Timothy Martin, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-91-2457. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. June 14, 1995. *1104 Rita A. Fr