Cases

610 F.Supp.2d 1261 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert D. KAHRE, et al., Defendants. Cr. No. 05-00121 DAE-RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. April 20, 2009. J.G. Damm, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, Christopher J. Maietta, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff. William A. Cohan, Esq.,

Matter of Hazelselena S. M. (Alyssa G.) (2024 NY Slip Op 06010) Matter of Hazelselena S. M. (Alyssa G.) 2024 NY Slip Op 06010 Decided on December 03, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. On November 15,1994, Alvin Coney’s vehicle collided with a Union Pacific Railroad (“Union Pacific”) freight train. Coney brought this diversity action against Union Pacific, alleging that Union Pacific failed to provide adequate and active warning devices, maintain a proper lookout, sound the train’s whistle, and operate its train at an appropriate speed

675 F.Supp. 90 (1987) William STEINER on behalf of himself and all other Stockholders of Gordon Jewelry Corporation similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GORDON JEWELRY CORPORATION, Harry B. Gordon, Aron S. Gordon, W. Lowry Barfield, Danile P. Gordon, James C. Gordon, Douglas B. Gordon, Jack S. Blanton, Roy L. Dye, Jr., Arnold M. Miller, and L. William Heiligbrodt, Defendants. No. 87 C 4032. United States

*916OPINION PER CURIAM. This matter has been reheard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, upon the vote of a majority of the non-recused active judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35. We thank all the parties and their counsel, as well as the amici, for the prompt and pr

Opinion issued September 22, 2011 In The Court of Appeals

OPINION PER CURIAM: On October 7, 2003, California voters will be asked to cast a ballot on some of the most important issues facing the State, including an unprecedented vote on the recall of a governor. However, forty-four percent of the electorate will be forced to use a voting system so flawed that the Secretary of State has officially deemed it “unacceptable” and banned its use in all future elections.

PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. North Carolina, No. 2:11-cv-00500-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen 22 closed civil cases. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cou

Mercure, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), entered January 19, 1994, which granted petitioner’s applications, in four proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate respondent’s children to be permanently neglected, and terminated respondent’s parental rights. Respondent, the mother of the four children who are the respective subjects of these proce

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district courts’ orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district courts. Davis v. Durham,

861 F.Supp. 363 (1994) Andre DUCROT and Danille Ducrot dba Le Strand Cafe, et al., [In re: Ampac Cases] Plaintiffs, v. MARSHALL & STERLING, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Lawrence M. NEADLE, Jr. et al., Third Party Defendants. Civ. Nos. 1991/0257, 1991/0310. United States District Court, D. Virgin Islands, St. Croix Division. August 24, 1994.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 16-4379 ______________ AMY WEBER, Individually, and as Parent, Natural Guardian and Next Friend on behalf of K.A., a Minor v. FRANCES A. MCGROGAN, Individually and as a STATE actor Judge for the Bergen County Family Court; PET

Andrias, J., dissents in a memorandum as follows: The issue before us is not custody of the two children, who are not presently residing with the respondent parents. That issue will be resolved at the dispositional hearing that we all agree is necessary. The sole question here is whether the agency petitioning to terminate respondents’ parental rights met its burden of demonstrating that it made “diligent efforts” to reunite the f

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge. This case raises serious questions concerning the attempted termination of certain insurance benefits under a welfare benefit plan for retired employees by an employer.in the process of reorganization in bankruptcy. The benefits in question were not the subject of any collective bargaining agreement. There is involved in this controversy the application of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

WEIMER, J., dissenting. |,In our adversarial system of justice, each side is represented by opposing counsel. No matter how abhorrent the crime, for that system of justice to function properly, conflict free counsel is essential. To that end, this court and the United States Supreme Court have set forth certain standards for counsel with which our trial courts must comply. Here, the majority

344 F.3d 914 SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT; Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Greater Los Angeles; National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; California State Conference of Branches, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Kevin SHELLEY, in his official capacity as California Secretary of State, Defendant-Appellee,Ted Costa, Intervenor-Appellee. No. 03-56498.

W. M. Robinson being desirous of purchasing ox teams and a logging outfit from the appellant W. J. Williams, importuned the Keith Lumber Company to go his security upon the purchase money notes to be given in event of such purchase. J. F. Keith, the president of the company, promised him in behalf of the company that if he would get some good man to go on the notes as maker with him, the company would endorse them. Keith, then, being told by Robinson that he could get J. Ogg to join him in th

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS OCTAVIO AMARO, § Appellant, No. 08-14-00052-CR § v. Appeal from the § THE STATE OF TE

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of thi