Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Danning v. Cooper”
Rechtien v. Cooperpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM: Appellant Michael Cooper appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Boone County following a bench trial The circuit court’s judgment quieted title to a piece of real property in Boone County in Respondents David and Christine Rechtien. The judgment also denied Cooper’s counterclaim seeking specific performance of an agreement which ga
Cooper v. the Statepublic domain
BARNES, Presiding Judge. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Jacquez M. Cooper appeals his convictions for armed robbery, aggravated assault and possession of a firearm or knife during the commission of a felony. 1 He was sentenced to twenty years, to serve twelve, for the robbery conviction, a concurrent
Cooper v. Statepublic domain
153 P.3d 371 (2007) Jeremy L. COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. A-9426. Court of Appeals of Alaska. March 9, 2007. Dan S. Bair, Assistant Public Advocate, and Chad W. Holt, Supervising Assistant Public Advocate, Anchorage, for the Appellant. Tamara E. de Lucia, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Special Prosecutions and Appeals, Anchorag
Cooper v. LAURA ANN COOPER AND ED BESSpublic domain
Decisions of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Without Opinions Dismissed for failure to file brief complying with Rule 28, Ala. R.App.P.
DON E. BURRELL, J. Ronell M. Cooper (“Defendant”) was convicted after a bench trial of third-degree domestic assault for causing physical injury to S.A (“Victim”) “by grabbing and twisting her wrist[.]” See section 565.074. 1 Victim did not testify at Defendant’s trial. In a single point, Defendant a
Cooper v. Statepublic domain
95 S.W.3d 488 (2002) Joshua Myles COOPER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-00-00958-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). November 27, 2002. *489 Robert R. Luke, Deguerin & Dickson, Houston, for Appellant. Dan McCrory, Assistant District Attorney, for the State. Panel consists of
Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Andrew Young has sued Cooper Cameron Corporation (“Cooper”) on the ground that it has failed to pay premium overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 203, 207. Young alleges that he regularly worked more than forty hours per week in his position as a Product Design Specialist (“PDS”) and that Coope
City of Vicksburg v. Cooperpublic domain
¶ 1. On April 21, 2003, the Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Vicksburg rendered its decision to terminate Gary Cooper's employment with the Vicksburg Police Department. Cooper appealed this decision to the Civil Service Commission of the City of Vicksburg, and a hearing was conducted on August 13, 2003. On August 21, 2003, the Commission affirmed the decision of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Cooper appealed the decision of the Commission to the Circuit Court of Warren Cou
Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooperpublic domain
The law firm of Boyce Isley, PLLC, and its member attorneys G. Eugene Boyce, R. Daniel Boyce, Philip R. Isley and Laura B. Isley (collectively, "plaintiffs") appeal from an order of the trial court *Page 27 dismissing plaintiffs' complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse in part the order of the trial court. The facts relevant to this appeal are as follow
Cooper v. Statepublic domain
639 So.2d 1320 (1994) Ione COOPER and Orman R. Cooper a/k/a Rob Cooper v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 91-KA-0821. Supreme Court of Mississippi. June 9, 1994. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1994. *1321 Roy O. Parker, Roy O. Parker, Jr., Roy O. Parker & Associates, Tupelo, for appellant. Michael C. Moore, Att
Cooper v. McBeathpublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: The chief question in this case is whether certain portions of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code (“Code”) violate the Commerce Clause and/or the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution. Finding that the dispute is not moot and that the plaintiffs possess ample standing to challenge the statutes, we determine that the Code
Cooper v. Oakespublic domain
427 Pa. Superior Ct. 430 (1993) 629 A.2d 944 Eleanor COOPER, Appellee, v. Harvey OAKES as Administrator of the Estate of James L. Cooper, Appellees. Appeal of Christine RICHMOND, Karen Douthett and Sharon Braden, Appellants. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 9, 1993. Filed June 21, 1993. Reargument Denied August 30, 199
Cooper v. Kalkwarfpublic domain
John Dan Kemp, Chief Justice, concurring. h7I join in the majority opinion. Still, I question whether “it serves ... the interests of the children [or] the ends of justice to view relocation cases through the prisms of presumptions and threshold tests that artificially skew the analysis in favor of one outcome or another.” Tropea v. Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727, 642 N.Y.S.2d 575, 665
Cooper v. Harrispublic domain
Justice KAGAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The Constitution entrusts States with the job of designing congressional districts. But it also imposes an important constraint: A State may not use race as the predominant factor in drawing district lines unless it has a compelling reason. In this case, a three-judge District Court ruled that North Carolina officials violated that bar when they created two districts whose voting-a
Cooper, Michaelpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1022-12
Matter of Estate of Cooperpublic domain
913 P.2d 393 (1996) 81 Wash.App. 79 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF De Anne C. COOPER, Deceased. Joyce Cooper JOHNSTON, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. Fermore B. COOPER and Richard A. Cooper, Appellants. No. 13134-3-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. March 28, 1996. *395 James J. Workl
People v. Cooperpublic domain
We affirm defendant's conviction by jury for armed robbery. Defendant raises two issues. He claims first that the circuit court erroneously allowed the introduction of hearsay. He claims second that the circuit court erred in allowing substantive use of an out-of-court statement made by a witness under section 115-10.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 115-10.1). • 1 A witness testified that defendant's coconspirator told him t
Cooper, Michaelpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1022-12 MICHAEL COOPER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY C OCHRAN, J., filed a concurring
State v. Cooperpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Cooper, 2016-Ohio-5064.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. John W.
Cooper v. Cooperpublic domain
978 So.2d 1156 (2008) Jonathan Nicholas COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tela Denise Dooly COOPER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 43,244-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. March 12, 2008. *1158 Klotz, Simmons, & Brainard, by B. Trey Morris, Cynthia L. Carroll, Shreveport, for Appellant. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens