Cases

554 F.Supp. 628 (1982) Billy Wayne CLAYTON, Plaintiff, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Michael Wacks and Larry Montague, Defendants. Civ. A. No. H-82-0338. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 22, 1982. Supplemental Opinion January 10, 1983. *629

866 F.Supp. 1329 (1994) Martha THOMASON, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and Dwight E. Keefer, Defendants. No. 93-4150-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 28, 1994. Dan E. Turner, Phillip L. Turner, Turner Law Office, Topeka, KS, for plaintiff. Grant M. Glenn, R. Patrick Riordan, Woner, Glenn, Reeder, Lowry & Girard

The pertinent facts are set out in the judgment and may be stated as follows: On 29 December, 1916, J. B. Hill and others conveyed to Emma J. Tucker, wife of S.D. Tucker, approximately forty acres of land. This deed was duly recorded and cross-indexed as follows: "Hill, al J. B. to Emma J. Tucker." "Tucker, Emma J. from J. B. Hill, al." On 3 January, 1931, Emma J. Tucker and her husband, S.D. Tucker, executed and delivered to F. J. Forbes, trust

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) filed this declaratory judgment action seeking an interpretation of certain provisions of an “employee benefit plan” under the applicable provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The district court 1

JENKINS, District Judge: John E. Ward (“Ward”), former President and CEO of Management Analysis Company (“MAC”), brought this action under § 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, seeking to recover benefits pursuant to his former employer’s long-term disability plan. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Californi

33 F.Supp.2d 1179 (1998) Roger M. LEVIN, an individual, and Roger M. Levin, M.D., Inc., a Medical Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Robert Adler; Does 1 Through 20, Inclusive, Defendants. No. C-974327 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 27, 1998. Dan Feinberg, Sigman Lewis & Feinberg, Oakland, CA, Joseph Hof

27 F.Supp.2d 926 (1998) Ellen LAIN, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. Civ.A. H-97-3560. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 22, 1998. *927 Paul D. Clote, Paul D. Clote and Associates, Houston, TX, Marc E. Grossberg, Schlanger Mills Mayer & Grossberg, Houston,

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Andrew Ruttenberg filed a claim for total disability benefits with his insurer, United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York (“U.S. Life” or the “Company”). After protracted consultations with a number of physicians and consultants produced no ruling on the claim, Mr. Ruttenberg filed suit. Originally, he alleged claims under Illinois law.

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge. Plaintiff Alphonse M. Santino appeals the district court’s determination that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (ERISA), preempts his state law claims and its dismissal of his lawsuit as untimely. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM. I

No. 95-2064 _____________ The Prudential Insurance * Company of America, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United * States District Court for v. * the Eastern District of * Missouri. John Doe, individually and as * parent and guardian ad lite

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This case involves a denial of health benefits claimed by Jose Vega and his wife, Vilma Vega, under a health benefits plan they established for themselves and the employees of their business, the Corona Paint & Body Shop, Inc. (“Corona”). The Vegas sued the insurance companies responsible for insuring and maintaining the pla

400 F.Supp. 1085 (1974) BRAND DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 74-28-N. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. October 2, 1974. *1086 *1087 James M. Gallagher, Hofheimer, Nusbaum & McPhaul, Norfolk, Va., f

289 F.Supp.2d 324 (2003) Richard E. PEARL, Plaintiff, v. MONARCH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, The Guardian Life Insurance Company, and Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 03-CV-2788(TCP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 30, 2003. *325 Scott Moore Harrigan, Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C.,

910 F.2d 1084 59 USLW 2167, 31 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 115 UNITED STATES of Americav.Anthony PUNGITORE, Jr., Appellant in No. 89-1371.UNITED STATES of Americav.Joseph GRANDE. Appellant in No. 89-1372.UNITED STATES of Americav.Francis IANNARELLA, Jr., Appellant in No. 89-1393.UNITED STATES of Americav.Phillip NARDUCCI. Appellant in No. 89-1395.UNITED STATES of Americav.

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge: This case involves claims for denial of benefits under two disability insurance policies. Appellant-cross-appellee Larry Hollis (“Hollis”) began work with R.M. Hendrick Graduate Supply House, Inc. (“Graduate Supply”) as a salesman in 1970. Graduate Supply sells class rings, diplomas, regalia, graduation invitations, yearbooks, and other similar

956 F.Supp. 841 (1997) John E. COONLEY, as Trustee of the James E. Coonley II Trust, and ABCM Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. FORTIS BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 95-3077-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. January 21, 1997. *842 Mark L. Tripp, Cynthia A. Hurley, argued, Bradshaw, Fowler, Pro

951 F.Supp. 1003 (1996) Miller B. ENGELHARDT, Plaintiff, v. PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-D-699-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. November 6, 1996. *1004 Dennis R. Bailey; Nicholas T. Braswell, III; Charles A. Stakely, Jr., Montgomery, AL, for plaintiff

100 So.2d 696 (1957) LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. Gaston WELDON. 5 Div. 605. Supreme Court of Alabama. November 14, 1957. Rehearing Denied March 6, 1958. *699 Spain, Gillon & Young, Ralph B. Tate and Frank M. Young, Birmingham, and Reneau & Reneau, Wetumpka, for Liberty Nat. Life. Ins

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction... 393 II. Facts... 394 III. Law... 395 A. Legal Standard.. .395 B. Overtime under FLSA and NYLL...395 C. Joint Employment.. .395 1. Vertical Employment.. .396 2. Horizontal Emplo

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE APPRAISAL OF DELL INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. 9322-VCL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 11, 2015 Date Decided: July 13, 2015 Date Revised: July 30, 2015 Stuart M. Grant, Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackinstosh, Jennifer A. Williams, Rebecca A. Musarra, GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Wilmington, Dela