Cases

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD BELL, SR. AND DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAPACITY AS CLERK OF CRIMINAL COURT * *

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD BELL, SR. AND DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAPACITY AS CLERK OF CRIMINAL COURT *

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD BELL, SR. AND DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAPACITY AS CLERK OF CRIMINAL COURT *

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD BELL, SR. AND DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAPACITY AS CLERK OF CRIMINAL COURT *

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD BELL, SR. AND DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAPACITY AS CLERK OF CRIMINAL COURT * *

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD BELL, SR. AND DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CAPACITY AS CLERK OF CRIMINAL COURT * * *******

KEISHA HENRY AND CEDRIC * NO. 2023-CA-0543 BRUMFIELD, III * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * RICHARD BELL, SR. AND FOURTH CIRCUIT DARREN LOMBARD IN HIS * CAPACITY AS CLERK OF STATE OF LOUISIANA CRIMINAL COURT

Opinion issued May 27, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00336-CV ——————————— DEZZIE BRUMFIELD, JOE ADAMO, JULIA ADAMS, NANCY ALLEN, ANDREW ANDERSON, BEVERLY ANDERSON, ONYEMA ANOZIE, WHITLEY ARRINGTON, SHARON BACON, KOLAWOLE BAKARE, LONNIE C

706 S.E.2d 111 (2011) REGGLER v. The STATE. No. A10A2067. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 4, 2011. *112 Cerille B. Nassau, Jonesboro, for appellant. Tracy Graham Lawson, District Attorney, Ikechi A. Brumfield, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BARNES, Presiding Judge. A jury convicted Darren Re

GASKINS, J. [ ¶ The defendant, Darren Dewayne Nickles, was convicted of one count of distribution of cocaine. He was adjudicated a fourth felony offender and was sentenced to serve 40 years at hard labor “without benefit.” The defendant appealed. We affirm the defendant’s conviction and, as amended, affirm his sentence. FACTS On the evening of January 23, 2009, members of the Shreveport Po

Per Curiam. In May 1998, after convicting appellee, Darren W. Mosley, of domestic violence, the Ross County Court of Common Pleas held a sentencing hearing at which it advised Mosley that postrelease control might be imposed *518following his release from prison and that if it were imposed and he violated a postrelease-control condition, he could be subjected t

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Brown Sims, a Houston law firm, was allegedly cheated out of its attorney's fee by its client, Adam Joseph Resources *859 (AJR) acting through collusion with the opposing party, CNA Metals and its attorneys. Brown Sims had successfully represented AJR-on a

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. 12Pefendant appeals his convictions and sentences for possession of cocaine and being a felon in possession of a firearm from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division “N”. For the following reasons, defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On August 6, 2008, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of informat

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. 11 This appeal arises from the medical malpractice suit brought by the decedent’s surviving spouse and children. The decedent passed away from acute renal failure after becoming dehydrated while in a nursing home’s care. After the lawsuit was filed, the nursing home filed an exception of prescription alleging that over one year had passed from the date of the alleged malpractice and the filing of the laws

JxDOUCET, Chief Judge. The defendant appeals a conviction of second degree murder. He alleges that the state failed to show that he was not acting in self defense when he shot Michael Pickens. The defendant, Darren Pierre, and Latina Moten had dated for about a year and a half. The two had a child born in July 1993. Ms. Moten testified that their relationship had ended on January 2, 1994. Mr. Pierre testi

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 517.] THE STATE EX REL. MOSLEY, APPELLEE, v. NICHOLS, SHERIFF, APPELLEE; BRUMFIELD ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. Mosley v. Nichols, 2001-Ohio-8.] Habeas corpus sought to compel relator’s release from Ross County Jail—Court of appeals’ grant of writ reversed and cause remanded for judgment consistent with Woods v. Telb. (No. 00-1380—Submitted

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00017-CV ___________________________ MEDICAL RX SERVICES LLC; REMCO PHARMACY, INC.; PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC D/B/A RX-DIRECT HOME DELIVERY; WESTLAKE HEALTH & BEAUTY PRODUCTS D/B/A WESTLAKE HEALTH MART PHARMACY; AND TM PHARMACY SERVICE

545 So.2d 560 (1989) STATE of Louisiana. v. Darren JAMES and Chris Woods. No. 88-KA-0031. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 9, 1989. *562 Dwight Doskey, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for appellants. Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty. and Sandra Pettle, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for appell

898 So.2d 450 (2004) Terry BOYD and All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. William J. Meyers and All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. Allied Signal, Inc. Carnell Bell, Martha M. Antoine, Mary L. Bowman, and John Stewart Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Children, Torri M. Stewart and Jeremy M. Stewart v. Honeywell International, Inc. (Formerly Allied Signal, Inc.) Leo Hilton, Kevin Coleman

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #077 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinion handed down on the 19th day of December, 2016, is as follows: BY HUGHES, J.: 2012-KA-0508 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JEFFREY CLARK (Parish of West Feliciana) For the reasons assigned herein, the defendant’s conviction and death sentence are affirmed. In the