Cases

PER CURIAM. David Lawrence Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dixon v. Francis, No. CA-00-939-5 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 14, 2002). We dispense wit

WALKER, Justice: Petitioner Paul Darren Spinks (“Petitioner”) appeals the November 1, 2016, order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County sentencing him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for the 2007 murder of his wife. Petitioner asserts that the trial court erred by: (1) refusing to dismiss the indictment returned by the grand jury based upon fraud; 2) impro

PER CURIAM: Richard M. Sumraa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. *867California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's asses

345 S.W.3d 261 (2011) Darren PRATHER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF CARL JUNCTION, MISSOURI, Defendant-Appellant. No. SD 30470. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. April 29, 2011. *262 Gregory P. Goheen, Kansas City, KS, for Appellant. John Nicholas, Carthage, MO, for Respondent. NANCY STE

718 F.Supp.2d 1364 (2010) Raymond A. LANFEAR, Terry Clark, Randall W. Clark, Antonio Fierros, and Jeffrey H. Thomson, Plaintiffs, v. HOME DEPOT, INC., Robert L. Nardelli, Francis S. Blake, John L. Clendenin, Milledge A. Hart III, Kenneth G. Langone, Gregory D. Brenneman, Claudio X. Gonzalez, Thomas J. Ridge, Bonnie G. Hill, Lawrence R. *1365 Johnston, Laban P. Jackson, Jr., Angelo R. Mozilo, Helen Johnson—Leip

295 S.W.3d 5 (2009) Raymond SOMERS, derivatively on behalf of EGL, INC., and Vivian Golombuski and Platinum PVA Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and Platinum PVA Fund, Appellants, v. James R. CRANE, Milton Carroll, James C. Flagg, Frank J. Hevrdejs, Paul W. Hobby, Michael K. Jhin, Neil E. Kelley, Sherman Wolff, Centerbridge Partners, L.P., The Woodbridge Co. Ltd. and Nominal Defendant EGL, Inc., Appellees. Raym

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an employment discrimination action in which the plaintiffs allege that their former employers, defendants Gold*114man, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman Sachs” or the “defendants”), denied them equal compensation and

[Cite as State v. Mancini, 2020-Ohio-990.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NOS. 2019-T-0045 - vs - : 2019-T-

OSCN Found Document:IN RE ADOPTION OF K.P.M.A. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help

RULING FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge. The court conducted a telephone conference call on February 3, 2004, to discuss scheduling and to resolve a discovery dispute. At the request of the court, the parties submitted letter briefs to supplement their initial argument. After hearing from counsel and reviewing the documents submitted, the court DENIES plaintiffs discovery request. <

ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 539) of the Honorable Cam Fer-enbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on January 28, 2014. On February 14, 2014, the Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir (collectively the “Muir Defendants”) filed their Limited Objection (ECF No. 541) and AMG Services Inc., SFS, Inc., Red Ce

235 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2002) In re U.S. AGGREGATES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. C 01-01688 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 14, 2002. *1064 Brian R. Blackman, David R. Ongaro, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis LLP, Robert C. Gebhardt, Alec H. Boyd, Arter & Hadden, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Howard S. Caro,

FILED NOV 2 2022 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK ORDERED PUBLISHED U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re:

DATE: 11/18/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:45:21 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302016 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

DATE: 03/13/2017 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:23:09 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312016 GROUP 2, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

NO. 12-22-00076-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS HONOR CRUZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY BRADLEY CRUZ, DECEASED, ANTHONY COREY CRUZ, CAROLINE CRUZ, ANATOLIO BENEDICTO CRUZ, JR. AND ROSALINA SEDILLO § JUDICIAL DISTRICT C

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge WYNN and Judge FLOYD concurred. OPINION AGEE, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Talvin Taquane Lawing (“Lawing”) of one count of possession of ammunition by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) for which Lawing was sentence

Islet Scis., Inc. v. Brighthaven Ventures, LLC, 2017 NCBC 17. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 15 CVS 16388 ISLET SCIENCES, INC. ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ON

Opinion issued June 1, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas