Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Daryl F Gratz”
Gratz v. Bollingerpublic domain
539 U.S. 244 (2003) GRATZ ET AL. v. BOLLINGER ET AL. No. 02-516. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 1, 2003. Decided June 23, 2003. CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT *245 *246 *247
Kumrow v. Teamsters "General" Local No. 200public domain
579 F.Supp. 393 (1983) David A. KUMROW, Plaintiff, v. TEAMSTERS "GENERAL" LOCAL NO. 200 and Roundy's, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-C-1115. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. August 4, 1983. Daryl W. Laatsch, West Bend, Wis., for plaintiff. Timonthy G. Costello, Goldberg, Previant, Uelmen, Gratz, Miller & Brueggeman S.C., Milwaukee, Wis., fo
Roth v. City of Glendalepublic domain
237 Wis.2d 173 (2000) 2000 WI 100 614 N.W.2d 467 Rita ROTH, Delores Adair, Gary Budzinski, John Chelig, June LoCoco, George Farkus, Daryl R. Grober, Vera Gross, Andrew Huppert, Donald L. Jackson, Ronald Jackson, Harry Kalupa, DuWayne Kasal, Nona Koellner, Al Ohrmund, Edward Paul, Cliff Peak, Allen Reininger, Mildred Sievers, Fred Skerpea, Elain Stechauner, Tony Stechauner, Caroline Stelzel, Morene Tomasello
Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United Statespublic domain
435 F.Supp.2d 1136 (2006) RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 05-2328-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 26, 2006. *1137 *1138 Beverlee J. Roper, Daryl G. Ward, Stephen J. Torline, Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP, Kansas City, MO,
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.public domain
O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1185 This copyright case returns to us after a second jury trial, this one focusing on the defense of fair use. Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") filed suit against Google Inc. ("Google") 1 in the United
Laroque v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiffs, four private citizens and a private membership association, bring a facial challenge to the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c, and the 2006 amendments to Section 5, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c(b)-(d). Section 5, as amended, prevents certain “