Cases

OPINION KEAGUE, Circuit Judge. *522 ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. *508 This products liability action stems, tragically, from severe burn injuries suffered by a three-year old boy. After a nine-day

630 F.Supp.2d 687 (2007) Charles David CUMMINS v. UNUMPROVIDENT INSURANCE CO., et al. Civil Action No. 04-339-A. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. November 15, 2007. *690 June E. Denlinger, Baton Rouge, LA, for Charles David Cummins. Lauren A. Welch, Retha Elizabeth Karnes, McCranie, Sistrunk, Anzelmo, Hardy, M

ORDER , MARK D. CLARKE, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs Oregon Wild, Friends of Living Oregon Waters, and Western Watersheds Project (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit against Defendants Constance Cummins, the United-States Forest Service,' Laurie R. -Sada, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively, “Defendants”). Ed Garrett Ranch, Inc.; Philip Grohs; Matt Owens; Ada

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment [DN 143]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Defendants’ supplemental motion for summary judgment. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 David Gwynn (Gwynn) appeals from a summary judgment order entered for Douglas and Kim Cummins (the Cumminses) by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County. We reverse and remand. ¶2 We consider the following issue on appeal:

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered August 13, 2004 in a medical malpractice action. The order denied the motions of defendants Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and Peter Vasilion, M.D. seeking dismissal of the complaint as time-barred. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the

628 F.Supp.2d 737 (2009) David R. CUMMINS, Conservator for C.A.P., a minor, Plaintiff v. BIC USA, INC., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and McDonald's Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-00019-JHM. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Bowling Green Division. May 22, 2009. Jeffrey L. Eastham, Greensburg, KY, Joseph H. Mattingly, III, Mattingly, Nally-Mar

*848¶1 The question presented in this case is whether, under the public duty doctrine, an actionable “special relationship” is created between a member of the public and a government entity when an individual places a “911 call,” identifies the nature of his medical emergency, provides a street address but not his name, and “hangs up” prior to either requesting help or receiving an oral assurance f

MAYER, Circuit Judge. Cummins Inc. appeals the United States Court of International Trade’s grant of summary judgment, which held that the crankshafts imported by Cummins into the United States did not originate in Mexico and were not entitled to preferential treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). Cummins Inc. v. United States, 3

Coven, J. This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R A. D. A, Rule 8A appeal by third-party defendant Mann after entry of judgment for the defendants on their claims against her for contribution and indemnification. Defendants James R. Cummins and his wife, defendant Ruthann Cummins (“the Cumminses”), lived in a Northbridge, Massachusetts subdivision called the “Heights at Hill Street 2.” Lots in that subdivision were subje

676 F.Supp.2d 719 (2009) TAS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CUMMINS, INC., Defendant. Case No. 07 CV 1141. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division. December 10, 2009. *720 Daniel J. Voelker, Jacob D. Koering, Jeffrey L. Dorman, Paul A. Duffy, Freeborn & Peters, Chicago, IL, Timothy L. Bertschy,

457 F.Supp.2d 843 (2006) CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP., Plaintiff, v. GLORY LTD., Glory Shoji Co., Ltd., and Glory (U.S.A.), Inc., Defendants. No. 02 C 7008. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 13, 2006. *845 Edward L. Foote, Andrew C. Warnecke, Bruce L. Bower, John Edmund Mooney, Peter Charles McCabe,

470 F.Supp.2d 797 (2006) Karen DORRIS, Plaintiff, v. CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, INC. GROUP INSURANCE PLAN; Long Term Disability Plan of Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Cummins, Inc.; Connecticut General Life Insurance Company; and Life Insurance Company of North America; Defendants. No. 3:04-0983. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. December 19, 2006.</

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 13a0228p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - DAVID R. CUMMINS, Conservator for C.A.P.,

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Berger/Cummins JV ) ASBCA Nos. 59427, 59428 ) Under Contract No. W912BU-I0-D-0016 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: David M. Nadler, Esq. David Y. Yang, Esq.

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Berger/Cummins JV ) ASBCA No. 59429 ) Under Contract No. W912BU-I0-D-0016 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: David M. Nadler, Esq. David Y. Yang, Esq.

KANNE, Circuit Judge. The predicate for this case is a familiar one: a company makes optimistic predictions about future performance, the predictions turn out to be less than prophetic, and shareholders cry foul, or more specifically, fraud. Alan Stransky and Raphael Warkel filed a class action suit against Cum-mins Engine Company, Inc. (Cummins), alleging securities fraud. The district court dismissed with prejudice, purs

697 F.Supp. 64 (1988) James J. CUMMINS, Plaintiff, v. EG & G SEALOL, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-0114 L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. October 14, 1988. *65 A. Lauriston Parks and Raymond A. Marcaccio, Providence, R.I., for plaintiff. David Rapaport, Boston, Mass., Frederick Cass, Providence, R.I.,

690 F.Supp. 134 (1988) James J. CUMMINS v. EG & G SEALOL, INC. Civ. A. No. 87-0114 L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. June 30, 1988. A. Lauriston Parks, Raymond A. Marcaccio, Providence, R.I., for plaintiff. David Rappaport, Boston, Mass., Frederick Bass, Providence, R.I., for defendant. OPINION AND ORDER LAGUEUX, Di