Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1440 DAVID R. CAMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANLEY O. FAITH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1440 DAVID R. CAMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANLEY O. FAITH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00265-CV ___________________________ JIMMIE A. FRANKLIN AND DAVID C. COWDEN, Appellants V. JACQUELINE CHATTO, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA HOLLY SHELDON-LEE, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-18214

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. ¶ 1 *474 This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming a judgment of conviction of the Circuit Court for Monroe County, David Rice, Judge. 1 The case was decided by one j

FOX, Justice. [¶1] David Hailing, as manager of Professional Business Holdings, LP (PBH), and Joyce Hailing, as president of MedCon, Inc, (MedCon), each purchased an undivided half interest in a parcel of land in Lincoln County, Wyoming, from Brandon Bentley. Mr. Hailing, individually and as manager of PBH, executed a mortgage in favor of Mr. Bentley on PBH’s half interest as se

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-KA-01747-COA DAVID JONES A/K/A DAVID BERNARD JONES APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/17/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT B. HELFRICH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORN

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 09-426V April 8, 2013 To be Published ************************************* DAVID A. BROWN, * * Petitioner, * Final Application for Attorneys’ Fees and

2018 WI 109 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP1609-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Faith N. Reed, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 15 2017, 7:57 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral

MASSA, Justice. Nearly two centuries ago, Justice Stephen C. Stevens observed: “the wisest of judges have had much trouble in wading through the labyrinth of difficulties, dis-criminations, technicalities and shades that have gathered around the statute of limitations.” Raymond v. Simonson, 4 Blackf. 77, 84 (Ind.1835).

The third-party plaintiff, Richard W. Gushman, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing his third-party complaint against the state of Ohio, and raises a single assignment of error, as follows: "The Court of Claims erred in dismissing Mr. Gushman's third party complaint against the state of Ohio because the third party complaint states claims against the state in accordance with the same rules of law applicable to suits between private parties and the Court of Claims h

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-244C Filed: February 22, 2021 E&I GLOBAL ENERGY SERVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Joseph Whitcomb, Whitcomb, Selinsky, P.C., Denver, CO, for Plaintiff. Christopher L. Harlow, Trial Attorney, Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civi

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 281 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-22-1 DAVID THOMAS AND CYNTHIA Opinion Delivered May 17, 2023 PARKER APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE FULTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 25CV-18-69] V. HONORABLE LEE WISDOM ADAM GRAY; AMANDA

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00182-CV Edward Sanchez, Appellant v. David B. Fiedler and Xuan S. Zhang a/k/a Sharon Zhang, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 428TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 11-0784, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OP

HARRIS, Judge: ¶1 Permission to amend pleadings should be "freely give[n]," see Utah R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), especially where permission is sought at or near the end of fact discovery, before expert discovery, before any trial date has been set, and where the grounds for at least some of the amendments were first discovered only weeks before the end of the fact discove

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00025-CV Jerry Scarbrough, Denise Steele, and Melissa Victoria Deaton, Appellants v. Helen Purser; Sue E. Purser a/k/a Sue E. Van Zanten; Gary W. Purser, Jr.; JoAnn M. Purser; and Elizabeth H. Tipton, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

WATERMAN, Justice. This attorney disciplinary case arises from a lawyer’s missteps that resulted in the dismissal of an appeal. His clients disputed the amounts their business owed to the plaintiffs in a mechanic’s lien action and went to trial against his .advice. The clients were disappointed in the trial outcome and chose to appeal but fell behind in paying his legal fees. The court reporter insisted on an advance payment

Ruiz, Senior Judge: These appeals present us with legal issues of first impression concerning the special motion to dismiss created by the District of Columbia’s Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Anti-SLAPP) Act, D.C. Code §§ 16-5501 to - 5505 (2012 Repl.): whether denial of a special motion to dismiss is immediately appealable and the standard applicable in

SUPERIOR COURT JOSEPH E. SZAWLOWSKI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE STAN AND MARY ELLEN SZAWLOWSKI FAMILY TRUST v. GEORGE W. PRICE AND OTHERS[1] v. JAMES F. MARTIN AND OTHERS[2] Docket: 2180CV0013 Dates: February 4,