Cases

OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMAN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Mary Langton brings this action against Defendants the Town of Ches-ter (the “Town”) and Alex Jamieson (collectively, the “Town Defendants”) and the Town of Chester Library Board (the “Library Board”) and Teresa Mallon (collectively, the “Library Defendants”) for alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Each defendant group has mov

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3740-16T2 JED GOLDFARB, Plaintiff-Appellant/ APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION AS REDACTED Cross-Respondent, June 26, 2019

1 F.Supp.2d 1357 (1998) Lisamarie DeSHIRO and Karen Landon, Plaintiffs, v. David BRANCH, individually, Edward Glen McCabe, individually, and Paramount Payphones, Inc., a Nevada corporation, d/b/a PPI Payphones, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Defendants. No. 96-800-CIV-T-17-E. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 17, 1998. Alex Lancaster, Am

Langton v Sussman & Watkins (2025 NY Slip Op 02765) Langton v Sussman & Watkins 2025 NY Slip Op 02765 Decided on May 7, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

OSTRER, J.A.D. *26This appeal arises out of defendant's broken promise to hire plaintiff to manage a portion of defendant's assets and those of his brother and father. Defendant and plaintiff agreed that plaintiff would receive a salary plus a percentage of investment gains. In reliance on that promise, but before receiving a confirming writing,

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE AMY SILVERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 21-0720 FILED 6-22-2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa Coun

Sharpnack, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] The City of Charlestown, Indiana, executed an agreement to sell its water utility to Indiana-American Water Company, Inc., subject to approval by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. NOW!, Inc., a not-for-profit entity opposed to the sale, filed a petition asking the IURC to reject the agreement. Charlestown

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 296A22 Filed 15 December 2023 FREEDOM MORRIS v. DAVID RODEBERG, M.D., individually and in his individual capacity, and PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED d/b/a VIDANT MEDICAL CENTER Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 285 N.C. App. 143 (2022), reversing an order entered on 16 M

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRYAN REILLY, individually on ) behalf of himself and all others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0654-LWW ) KEITH L. HORN, ZACHARY )

DATE: 11/18/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:45:21 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302016 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

901 F.2d 730 Carl Dean SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Samuel LEWIS, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, inhis individual and official capacity; Paul J. Schriner,Dep. Warden, Santa Cruz Unit, in his individual and officialcapacity; Alex Machain, Sr. Chaplain, Perryville Complex,in his individual and official capacity; George Tichy,Senior Security Officer for the Santa Cruz Unit, in hisindividual and official

18 F.Supp.2d 531 (1998) Richard M. LUCAS and Maryann Lucas, Plaintiffs, v. HACKETT ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant, and Isadore GROSSMAN; Harco Enterprises, Inc., t/a Harco Financial Group; Wayne A. Hawk; Hale Associates, Inc.; Wm. Page & Associates, Inc., t/a Page & Associates, Inc.; Mark Fried; Human Resource Options, Inc.; Hiv Trust; Defendants and Third-Party, Plaintiffs, v. James L. LALIME; John L. Kadow; David Miller; Ja

846 F.Supp. 827 (1994) COTE d'AZUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. VENTURE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. C-92-1758 EFL. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 14, 1994. *828 *829 Sean Conley, Alexander Anolik, Michael Hardy, San Francisco, CA, for Cote D'Azur Homeown

700 F.Supp.2d 599 (2010) G. Philip STEPHENSON, as Trustee of the Philip Stephenson Revocable Living Trust, Plaintiff, v. CITCO GROUP LIMITED; CITCO Fund Services (Europe) BV; CITCO (Canada), Inc.; and Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, LLP (an Ontario limited liability partnership), Defendants. No. 09 CV 00716(RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 1, 2010.

625 N.W.2d 377 (2001) 463 Mich. 675 ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 114919, Calender No. 1. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued October 10, 2000. Decided May 1, 2001. *378 Bodman, Longley & Dahling, L.L.P. (by James

WILSON, Circuit Judge: We vacate the opinion cited at Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 573 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir.2009), and substitute the following in its place. The plaintiffs, David Corbitt and Alexander Raya (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”), on their sexual harassment and retaliation claims

548 F.3d 931 (2008) UNITED STATES ex rel. Edward J. BURLBAW and Donald D. Bustamante, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. J. Michael ORENDUFF, in his individual capacity; William Conroy, in his individual capacity; Robert E. Weigle, in his individual capacity; Linda Davidson, the Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Davidson, in his individual capacity; Donald Birx, in his individual capacity; Miriam A. Gerber Meyer, in her indiv

WILSON, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, David Corbitt and Alexander Raya (collectively, “Appellants”), ap*1230peal the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”), on their sexual harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and their state law claims o