Cases

Opinion KENNARD, J. After removal from defendant insurance company’s “preferred provider” lists, plaintiff physician brought this action. Citing the common law right to fair procedure, which forbids arbitrary expulsions from private organizations under certain circumstances, plaintiff alleged he should have been given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be

568 So.2d 623 (1990) Dennis POTVIN Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WRIGHT'S SOUND GALLERY, INC. Defendant-Appellant. No. 21,768-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 26, 1990. Rehearing Denied October 25, 1990. *624 Peatross, Greer & Frazier by L. Edwin Greer, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

24 B.R. 54 (1982) In re POTVIN LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 82-00199. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont. September 18, 1982. Richard A. Lang, Jr., Burlington, Vt., for debtor. Richard S. Smith and Frederick Harlow, Rutland, Vt., for Berkshire Bank and Trust Co. *55 Jerome I. Meyers, Springfield, Vt.

DEAN V. NEAL COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-034-CV WILLIAM H. DEAN AND MADELYN S. DEAN APPELLANTS

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-034-CV WILLIAM H. DEAN AND MADELYN S. DEAN APPELLANTS V. FRANK W. NEAL & ASSOCIATES,

116 P.3d 56 (2005) MGM MIRAGE, Appellant, v. Brenda COTTON, Respondent. No. 43324. Supreme Court of Nevada. July 28, 2005. David H. Benavidez, Henderson, for Appellant. Craig P. Kenny & Associates and Craig P. Kenny and Kathryn N. Potvin, Las Vegas, for Respondent. Before MAUPIN, DOUGLAS and PARRAGUIRRE, JJ. OPINION P

Marshall, C J. We must decide in this case whether the owner of a thirty-six unit apartment building in an area of the town of Wellesley zoned as a single-family district has a continuing obligation to make some of the apartments available at below market rents, where permission to build the complex was secured under the comprehensive permit statute, G. L. c. 40B, §§ 20-23 (Act). The permit was issued in July, 1982, to Cedar St

647 F.Supp.2d 86 (2009) Raphael OPHIR, and Boston Taxi Owners Association, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BOSTON, and Edward Davis, as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-10467-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 14, 2009. *87 Paul H. Merry, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff

576 F.Supp. 1461 (1983) Timothy JANOWIAK, Plaintiff, v. The CORPORATE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, Board of Public Safety, South Bend Fire Department, Mayor Roger Parent, Timothy Brassell, Fire Chief, Robert Potvin, Stanley M. Przybylinski, Defendants. Civ. No. S82-0209. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. December 29, 1983.

RUDMAN, J. [¶ 1] Tommy Bureau appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Androscoggin County, Delahanty, J.) in favor of Del Gendron, David Gendron, and Gendron Realty (Gendron), Paul R. Gosselin, Gosselin, Dubord & Ra-basco, P.A. (Gosselin), and Millett-Potvin Realty. Bureau contends that the court erred in granting a summary judgment to Gendron because Gendron failed to comply with M.R. Ci

21 A.3d 808 (2011) 301 Conn. 617 STATE of Connecticut v. David SHERIFF. No. 18293. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued March 24, 2011. Decided July 19, 2011. *810 William J. Sweeney, Jr., New Britain, for the plaintiff in error. Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, w

Filed 2/27/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MAGNUS SUNDHOLM, B324842 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 21STCV44898) HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEA

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 745 INTRODUCTION Appellant Andrew Kim (Kim) filed suit seeking an order compelling respondent Southern Sierra Council Boy Scouts of America (Boy Scouts) to promote him to the rank of Eagle Scout.1 The trial court determined tha

MEMORANDUM OPINION MARK W. VAUGHN, Chief Judge. The Court has before it the complaint of Jean Marie Sangi (“Plaintiff’) against the Debtor Defendant, Joseph San Giovanni (“Defendant”). The Plaintiff seeks that her debts be excepted from discharge pursuant to section 523(a)(5) and (15) of title 11 of the United States Code.1 The Court took evidence in this adversary

EVELEIGH, J., with whom PALMER, J., joins, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that the failure to provide a hearing in the juvenile court on class C and D and unclassified felonies prior to the transfer of such cases to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court, and to afford the defendant in the present case, who was fifteen years old

Duffly, J. At the heart of this appeal is a decision of a judge of the Land Court to award treble damages to the plaintiff landowner on her claim that the defendants cut down trees on the plaintiff’s land. The judge found that the defendants, David Bergmann and Sherri Bergmann (the Bergmanns) had wilfully cut down the trees and calculated the damage to the plaintiff, Joan C. Ritter, trustee of the Birch Knoll trust (Ritter), to

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 354 OPINION This construction defect case involves multiple summary judgments granted on limitations grounds. In three issues, William H. and Madelyn S. Dean contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgments on their claims against appellees Frank W. Neal Associa

777 F.Supp. 690 (1991) GREATER ROCKFORD ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 90-3119. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. October 28, 1991. *691 Wendell W. Wright, Wright & Wright, Danville, Ill., Bob F. Wright, Domengeaux & Wright, L

42 A.3d 478 (2012) 135 Conn.App. 563 Michael EAGEN v. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES et al. No. 33241. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 14, 2012. Decided May 22, 2012. *480 Antoria D. Howard, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were George Jeps

Opinion DiPENTIMA, C. J. In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court improperly concluded that a professional liability insurance policy covered certain medical malpractice claims brought against a professional corporation under the doctrine of vicarious liability. The plaintiff, Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (association), appeals from the judgment of the trial