Cases

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Sheriffs Deputy David Olson shot and killed Christopher Capps (Capps). Capps’s parents, Jerry and Jaylene Capps, sued Deputy Olson for using excessive force against their son in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Deputy Olson alleges Capps was charging towards him with a weapon at the time of the shooting. Capps’s parents allege Deputy Olson shot Capps in the ba

GARRETT, J: |, Kimmy Lee Olson appeals from a trial court judgment ordering that his former wife, Melody Ann Rushing Olson, receive $810,902.60 from the proceeds of a court-ordered sale of two jointly-owned condominiums to compensate her for the shareholder debt allocation she used for the down payment for the initial purchase of the condominiums. We affirm the trial court judgment. We also deny the exception. of pres

PER CURIAM.* |, After considering the record, the applicable law, and the oral argument before the court, we have determined that the writ application was improvidently granted. Therefore, we recall the order dated October 3, 2014, granting the writ application. The writ application is hereby denied. HUGHES, J., dissents and would consider the merits.

184 P.3d 1220 (2008) 220 Or. App. 77 Duane L. OLSON, Plaintiff, and S. David Olson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STATE of Oregon, by and through the DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION and Development, Defendant-Appellant. 06C10222; A133922. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 6, 2007. Decided May 14, 2008. De

57 Cal.Rptr.3d 284 (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 790 In re Sara Jane OLSON, on Habeas Corpus. No. B191958. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two. April 12, 2007. *285 Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, As

LUNDSTEN, J. ¶ 1. The appellants are landlords in the City of La Crosse. In the circuit court, they challenged a City ordinance requiring that they participate in an inspection and registration program. They sought declaratory and other relief, asserting that the ordinance was preempted by state statute. The circuit court rejected the landlords' challenge on summary judgment, and ordered their action dismissed with prejudice.

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice, dissenting. [¶ 71] I respectfully dissent. Section 52-06-04(2), N.D.C.C., is, I believe, ambiguous. The legislative history of the amendments to the statute is no less ambiguous as illustrated by the majority opinion and Justice Sandstrom’s dissenting opinion. It is particularly in this circumstance that I defer to the interpretation of the statute by the agency charged with its executi

461 F.Supp.2d 710 (2006) Terry OLSON, Denny L. Robinson, and Albert Simon, Plaintiffs, v. JENKENS & GILCHRIST, a Texas, Professional Corporation; Jenkens & Gilchrist, an Illinois Professional Corporation; Paul M. Daugerdas and Spouse; Donna Guerin and Spouse; Erwin Mayer and Spouse; Deutsche Bank Ag; Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. d/b/a Deutsche Bank Alex Brown, a Division of Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.; Timmis & Inman LLP; George

74 Cal.Rptr.3d 81 (2008) 42 Cal.4th 1142 179 P.3d 882 Carl OLSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Appellant. No. S143999. Supreme Court of California. February 28, 2008. *82 Law Office of Thomas K. Bourke, Thomas K. Bourke,

188 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 1999) DR. KENNETH J. OLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.RICHARD MORRIS, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, TERRY SCRITCHLOW, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, MAXINE IJAMS, individually and in her official capacity as a member of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, F. G. BOLTON, in

*631 WISE, Justice. Tiffin Motorhomes, Inc. (“Tiffin”), 1 sued Edgetech I.G., Inc., n/k/a Quanex I.G. Systems, Inc. (“Edgetech”); Quanex Building Products Corporation (“Quanex Building Products”); Thompson I.G., LLC, and RDM Consulting, LLC (here

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/23/2025 09:09 AM CDT - 45 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 319 Nebraska Reports FEY V. OLSON Cite as 319 Neb. 45 Barbara Fey and L. Gail Wurtele, appellees,

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: This interlocutory appeal is from the denial of Thomas Olson’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. We reverse the order denying qualified immunity, and we instruct that the district court grant Olson immunity. We also remand for further proceedings. I. Defendant Olson has been the Ma

OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: *1136 Appellant, Jeffrey Alan Olson, appeals from the December 22, 2016 Order entered in the Somerset County Court of Common Pleas dismissing his first Petition filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 - 9546. Relying on

29 F.Supp.2d 1027 (1998) Gary OLSON, Plaintiff, v. SNAP PRODUCTS, INC. and Sam McInnis, Defendants. No. Civ. 97-2437RHK/RLE. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. October 19, 1998. *1028 Thomas R. Dolven, Denver, CO, Joel Rath, Edina, MN, for Plaintiff. David R. Kelly, Minneapolis, MN, Kirk G. Warner, Raleigh, NC, an

Filed 4/20/22; Modified and Certified for Publication 5/13/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- ROBERT J. HASSETT, C092212 Plaintiff and Respondent,

Syllabus by the Court Where alternative dispute resolution proceedings were statutorily denominated "nonbinding" it was error for trial court to summarily enter judgment based on those proceedings and refuse party's request for trial. OPINION Appellant argues that the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial was error because the neutral's findings on which it was based were nonbinding. We agree and reverse.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW KEVIN H. SHARP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter arose upon the Petition for Return of Children pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspect of International Child Abduction (the “Hague Convention”), and the implementing legislation in the United States, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 11601, et

671 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2009) G.K. LAS VEGAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Sheldon Gordon, Plaintiffs, v. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-S-04-1199 DAE-GWF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. November 30, 2009. *1204 Ann M. Galvani, David Boies, Richard E. Weill, Robert B. Silver, Christopher M. Green, Boies Sc

789 P.2d 492 (1990) DAVID C. OLSON, INC., d/b/a DCO Contractors, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company; Howard Electrical & Mechanical, Inc.; and Johnson Controls, Inc., Cross-Claim Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO., Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. Nos. 87CA1851, 88