Cases

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge THACKER joined. PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), employees who work overtime generally are entitled to overtime pay. There is an exception — like all FLSA exceptions, narrowly construed — for certain “e

911 P.2d 266 (1995) In the Matter of the ESTATE of John G. GERARD, Deceased; Gene Crabtree, Executor, Appellant, v. Violet T. GERARD, widow and other heirs at law of John G. Gerard, Appellee. No. 83503. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. December 19, 1995. As Corrected December 27, 1995. Rehearing Denied February 22, 1996. Ollie Gresham, Tu

The petitioner Gregory Williams’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 837 (AC 23178), is denied.

*1211 OPINION FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Gerard Smith, Maricela Long, Gregory Thompson, Mickey Manzo, Scott Craig, Stephen Leavins (collectively, the “Joint Appellants”), and James Sexton each appeal their convictions for obstruction of justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice

Order entered September 16, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00671-CR WILLIAM GERARD PALMER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Opinion PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Gregory Williams, appeals from the habeas court’s judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly dismissed his petition after concluding that he did not establish that he was prejudiced by his trial counsel’s decision not to request a jury instruction on the defense of intoxication. We

Order entered September 17, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00671-CR WILLIAM GERARD PALMER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Crimi

SACK, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, Gerard O’Hara, a dockworker, and his wife Lisa, 1 appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (I. Leo Glasser, Judge) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying the plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to alleg

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00593-CR WOODY GERARD SOLOMON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

1 ,PER CURIAM. This post-conviction proceeding concerns funding issues for an indigent death row inmate represented by pro bono counsel. Defendant argues the systematic provision of funds to some death row inmates seeking post-conviction relief violates equal protection guarantees. Defendant’s equal protection claim appears to have two facets. First he suggests that those represented by the Capital Posb-Conviction P

464 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2006) Shirley WILLIAMS et al., Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant. No. 03-2200-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 8, 2006. *1101 Andrew H. McCue, Brian D. Defrain, Martin M. Meyers, The Meyers Law Firm, LC, Claudio E. Molteni, Dennis E. Egan, Stephen J. Dennis, Bert

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed March 25, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Declare Invalid Defendant Sprint’s Assertions of Privilege where Legal Counsel Was Not Involved (doc. 3595). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. Relevant Procedural Background On o

KEATING, Judge, dissenting: I join the majority in expressing dismay over the failure of the Government to act expeditiously in the appellate processing of this court-martial. I disagree only with the remedy the majority adopts to address that failure. This case, unlike the situation we addressed in our recent decision in United States v. Thomas, 41 M.J. 873 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App.1995) con

MEMORANDUM & ORDER LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. Plaintiff Shirley Williams filed this suit on behalf of herself and others similarly situated asserting that her age was a determining factor in defendant’s decision to terminate her employment during a reduction-in-force (RIF). This case has been provisionally certified as a collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).

154 F.Supp.2d 942 (2001) Hubert OXFORD III, and Joseph D. Johnson, Jr. v. WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., et al. No. 1:99-CV-648. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. June 29, 2001. *943 *944 George Michael Jamail, Wayne A. Reaud, Reaud Law Firm, Beaumont, TX, H. Jerome Gette

137 F.Supp.2d 756 (2001) Robert OXFORD III, and Joseph D. Johnson, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 1:99-CV-648. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. February 6, 2001. *757 *758 George Michael Jamail, Wayne A. Reaud, Reaud Law

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-166C (Filed: August 12, 2022) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** DAVID BOLAND, INC., * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATE

OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-Appellant Gerard Joseph Pa-lazzolo (“Petitioner”) was indicted in Michigan on a single charge of First-Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct (“CSC I”). The trial court granted Petitioner’s motion to reduce the charge to Second-Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct (“CSC II”), and entered Petitioner’s plea of nolo cont

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 27, 2013 at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DEMEKO GERARD DUCKWORTH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-D-3314 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge No. M2012-01234-CCA-R3-CD Filed May 10 th , 2013 The defendant, Demeko Gerard Duckworth, appeals his Davidson County Crimina