⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David Len Holl”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014-02-27 · Published · cited 37× · 743 F.3d 1152; 2014 WL 747606; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3717
BYE, Circuit Judge. David Holleman entered a conditional plea of guilty to possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s 1 denial of a motion to suppress evidence found in Holleman’s vehicle while it was parked in a hotel parking lot. Holleman also sought to sup
Gifford v. Pedleypublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 533 So. 2d 1194; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2550; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5092; 1988 WL 122457
SCHEB, Judge. Susan Gifford appeals a final summary judgment in favor of Dr. David Pedley in a medical malpractice action. We reverse. On February 28, 1985, Dr. Pedley surgically removed two teeth from his patient, Ms. Gifford, who had a history of treatment by medication for high blood pressure and hypertension. The afternoon following the surgery, Ms. Gifford was hospitalized after suffering a stroke an
District Court, D. Maryland · 2004-07-14 · Published · cited 1× · 222 F.R.D. 260; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13124; 2004 WL 1572650
MEMORANDUM OPINION BENNETT, District Judge. Five Plaintiffs instituted this lawsuit against the Defendant ARINC, Incorporated (“ARINC”) and the individual Defendants, Robert Manigold, and Leonard Kotz, executives in ARINC’s Human Resources Division, alleging employment discrimination on the basis of race and gender. In response to the class allegations set forth in the Complaint, the Defendants fi
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-06-02 · Published · cited 0× · 736 So. 2d 58; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7358; 1999 WL 345095
PADOVANO, J. This is an appeal from a final summary judgment for the defendants in a premises liability action. The complaint was based on a claim that a landlord has a duty to install a viewing device in the front door of an apartment to protect the tenant from an attack by an unknown assailant. We agree with the trial judge that the defendants had no such duty under the lease or under the law that applies to this case. The
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-11-16 · Published · cited 1× · 671 F. Supp. 2d 975; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106614; 2009 WL 3824669
671 F.Supp.2d 975 (2009) Karen ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. McNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, a Division of McNeil-PPC, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson, Defendants. No. 07 C 5603. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 16, 2009. *977 Charles W. Branham, Christopher J. Panatier, Clay B. Carroll, Dana C. Simon
Arizona Supreme Court · 2024-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA, INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER OF TUCSON, INC.; LAURA CONOVER, PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY, Appellants, v. KRISTIN K. MAYES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, and ERIC HAZELRIGG, M.D., AS GUARDIAN AD LI
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991-12-13 · Published · cited 1× · 780 F. Supp. 479; 23 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1510; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18462; 1991 WL 263252
780 F.Supp. 479 (1991) INSITUFORM OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MIDWEST PIPELINERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. C-3-91-251. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. December 13, 1991. *480 *481 Edwin M. Baranowski, Jonathan Hollingsworth, Juan Chardiet, Porter,
District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006-07-14 · Published · cited 64× · 238 F.R.D. 273; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48395; 2006 WL 2730355
ORDER STEELE,, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (doc. 330). Also pending are certain ancillary filings, including Defendants’ Motion to Re-Urge Motions to Strike or Exclude Experts Farber and McFaddin (doc. 364), Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Newly Disclosed Sampling Data (doc. 365), and Defendants’ Motion to Strike Affida
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000-07-27 · Published · cited 4× · 756 A.2d 186; 2000 R.I. LEXIS 175; 2000 WL 1049276
756 A.2d 186 (2000) Lincoln C. ALMOND, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Rhode Island et al. v. The RHODE ISLAND LOTTERY COMMISSION, Newport Grand Jai Alai, LLC, and Burrillville Racing Association, d.b.a. Lincoln Greyhound Park et al. No. 99-525-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 27, 2000. *187 Present: WEISBE
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 24× · 876 F.3d 63
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001-01-26 · Published · cited 82× · 239 F.3d 722; 2001 WL 55600
DAVID FOLSOM, District Judge: After a three-month-long trial, Appellants-Defendants Ben T. Reyes and Elizabeth (“Betti”) Maldonado (hereinafter “Reyes” and “Maldonado” respectively) were convicted of bribery and conspiracy to commit bribery and Reyes of mail fraud. Reyes and Maldonado appeal their convictions and the sentences that followed. We find no error as to either defenda
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016-09-19 · Published · cited 24× · 207 F. Supp. 3d 454; 2016 WL 4988061; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127026
MEMORANDUM A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge Presently before me are Defendant Dr. Michelle Ficca’s (“Dr. Ficca”) Post Trial Motions (Doc. 255) and Defendants Geis-inger Medical Center (“GMC”) and Arthur Richer’s (“Mr. Richer”) (collectively “Geis-inger Defendants”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial or Remit-titur. (Doc. 257) Because Dr. Ficca is not entitled to judgment as
District Court, D. Colorado · 2008-12-07 · Published · cited 126× · 580 F. Supp. 2d 1071
(2008) Merilyn COOK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and the Dow Chemical Company, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 90-CV-00181-JLK. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 7, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARING DAUBERT MOTIONS AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE KANE, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents<
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-03-28 · Published · cited 1983× · 146 L. Ed. 2d 121; 120 S. Ct. 1291; 529 U.S. 120; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 2195
529 U.S. 120 (2000) FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al. v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP. et al. No. 98-1152. United States Supreme Court. Argued December 1, 1999. Decided March 21, 2000. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *121 *122 <
People v. Trumppublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04756
People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
December 22, 2014 Justice Sharon Keller Presiding Judge Court of Criminal Appeals RECEIVED IN P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Austin, TX 78711 This document contains some JAN 0 5 Z015 RE: 03-13-00723CR D-1-DC-13-904021A pages that ar~ of p~or quality ""'"" A osta, Clerk at the t
Buckley v. Valeopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975-08-15 · Published · cited 22× · 171 U.S. App. D.C. 172; 519 F.2d 821
BAZELON, Chief Judge, filed a separate opinion dissenting from Part V — A—2 of the per curiam opinion. TAMM, Circuit Judge, joined by WIL-KEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the per curiam opinion, and concurring in the result only of Part V. MacKINNON, Circuit Judge, filed a separate opinion dissenting from Part VII of the per curiam opinion. Summary This case presents for r
Buckley v. Valeopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975-08-29 · Published · cited 88× · 519 F.2d 821
519 F.2d 821 171 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 75-2 USTC P 9750 James L. BUCKLEY, United States Senator from the State ofNew York, et al., Plaintiffs,v.Honorable Francis R. VALEO, Secretary, United States Senate,et al., Defendants.Center for Public Financing of Elections, et al., James C.Calaway of Houston, Texas, Intervenors. No. 75-1061. United States Cou
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-05-01 · Published · cited 52× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7834; 2003 WL 2010983
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu