Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

DELL, Judge. This appeal arises out of the settlement of a medical malpractice suit filed by appellees against Dr. David Drucker, Dr. Gary Birken, South Florida Pediatric Surgeons, P.A. (“SFPS”) and four other parties for negligence in the treatment of their daughter. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in enforcing the settlement entered into by Dr. Drucker and his insurer against SFPS, Dr. Drucker’s professional as

528 F.Supp.2d 450 (2007) SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Mitchell S. DRUCKER and Ronald Drucker, Defendants, William Minerva, Relief Defendant. No. 06 Civ. 1644(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 20, 2007. *451 Alexander Mircea Vasilescu, David Stoelting, Mark K. Schoenfeld, Amelia An

124 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 616 (1989) 556 A.2d 955 David Drucker v. The Zoning Hearing Board for The Borough of Wilkinsburg. The Borough of Wilkinsburg, Appellant. No. 1984 C.D. 1988. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 10, 1989. April 5, 1989. *617 Argued February 10, 1989,

12 So.3d 887 (2009) Ronald DANIELS, and Rowena Daniels, individually and as parents and next friends of Ronald Daniels, Jr., a minor, Appellants, v. David DRUCKER, M.D. and South Florida Pediatric Surgeons, P.A., Appellees. No. 4D08-2746. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 24, 2009. Rehearings Denied August 5, 2009 and August 13, 2009.</

Peters, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered February 20, 2001 in Sullivan County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment. Alleging that defendant had blocked a right-of-way to plaintiff’s property, plaintiff commenced this action to recover punitive as well as compensatory damages for the diminution in value of several automobiles which, according to plaintiff, deter

MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BAYLSON, District Judge. 1. Introduction This case involves claims of breach of contract1 and common law fraudulent inducement arising out of a client’s failure to pay legal fees. Plaintiff is the law firm Mendelsohn, Drucker & Associates (“Mendelsohn”) and Defendants are Titan Atlas Manufacturing

The plaintiff construction company, P. Gioioso & Sons, Inc. (Gioioso), purchased lower cost, high-deductible, occurrence-based insurance policies from the defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty), for five policy years. These policies required Liberty to pay all claims and then seek reimbursement from Gioioso of the deductible amounts. Additionally, Gioioso was required to post a letter of credit as security for its anticipated financial obl

Cadillac Leasing L.P. v Demoyano (2025 NY Slip Op 25082) [*1] Cadillac Leasing L.P. v Demoyano 2025 NY Slip Op 25082 Decided on April 2, 2025 Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County Ibrahim, J.

Cadillac Leasing L.P. v Demoyano (2025 NY Slip Op 25082) [*1] Cadillac Leasing L.P. v Demoyano 2025 NY Slip Op 25082 Decided on April 2, 2025 Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County Ibrahim, J.

326 B.R. 116 (2005) In the Matter of HA-LO INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor, HA2003 Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff v. J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC f/k/a Chase Venture Capital Associates, L.P., et al., Defendants. J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC f/k/a Chase Venture Capital Associates, L.P., et al. Third-Party Plaintiffs v. John R. Kelley, Jr., et al., Third-Party Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02 B 12059, Adversary No.

WINTER, Circuit Judge: The Secretary of Labor sued for an injunction under § 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 et seq. to enjoin defendants from violating the minimum wage, overtime, and record-keeping provisions of the Act, and to restrain them from withholding back wages owed to their employe

*1029Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in part filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL. MICHEL, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the decision of the United States Court of International Trade in this anti-dumping duty case, Borden, Inc., Gooch Foods, Hershey Foods Corp. v. United Sta

306 S.E.2d 199 (1983) Georgia SHEPARD v. DRUCKER & FALK, a partnership; Fairway Co., a limited partnership; David Falk, individually and as a general partner in Fairway Co., a limited partnership, and as a partner in Drucker & Falk, a partnership, Bernard Kayden, individually and as a general partner in Fairway Co., a limited partnership, E.E. Falk and Erwin B. Drucker, individually and as partners in Drucker & Falk, a partnership.

348 F.2d 563 Application of David BANDEL. Patent Appeal No. 7402. United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. July 19, 1965. Rehearing Denied October 12, 1965. John T. Kelton, New York City (William H. Vogt, III, William A. Drucker, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Tannerite Sports, LLC (“Tannerite”) seeks injunctive and monetary relief for economic and reputational injuries that it *225allegedly suffered as result of Statements made by NBCUniversal News Group, a Division of NBCUniversal Media, LLC (“NBCU”) a

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice, dissenting. This is a contract dispute over the validity of a lease, the amount owed under a lease, and the payment for the repairs to the building. See Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. DeLanney, 809 S.W.2d 493, 494 (Tex.1991) (“When the only loss or damage is to the subject matter of the contract, the plaintiffs action is ordinarily on the contract.”). The parties agreed that, when one of

OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. We hold that CPLR 901 (b) permits otherwise qualified plaintiffs to utilize the class action mechanism to recover *390compensatory overcharges under Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P. (13 NY3d 270 [2009]), even though Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (RSL) (Administrative Code of City of NY) § 26-516

Charles Margett, J. This is a motion (1) “pursuant to Sections 5104 and 5105 of the CPLR ” to punish defendant for contempt for his willful failure to comply with a judgment of this court entered October 4,1966 and (2) “ pursuant to Sections 5106 and 5228, et seq., of the CPLR ’ ’ for the appointment of a receiver of 50 shares of stock of the House of Bagels, Inc., held in the name of defendant’s wife, Yetta Drucker.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989)(where court determined . that criminal defendant received effective assistance of counsel,, defendant/attorney in subsequent civil malprac*239tice action may defensively assert collateral estoppel); State v. Viscioso, 709 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(affirming on appeal and cross app