Cases

Mathias, Judge. On remand from this court, the Porter Superior Court issued an order denying the motion of Constantinos P. Angelopou-los (“Constantinos”) seeking to modify a protective order preventing him from using certain materials obtained during discovery and designated as confidential by Appellees-Defendants Beta Steel Corp. (“Beta Steel”) and Top Gun Investments Corp. II

OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. Melanie Davis f/k/a David Paul Summers ("Davis") appeals the order of the Momoe Cireuit Court dismissing Davis's petition to dissolve her marriage with Angela Summers ("Summers"). On appeal, Davis claims that the trial court erred in concluding that Davis and Summers's marriage was void under Indiana Code section 31-11-1-1, which

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 02:29 PM

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 04 2017, 9:30 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jul 30 2019, 9:15 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

303 S.E.2d 668 (1983) Orton A. JONES, Committee of Doris R. Smith, an Incompetent; Marjorie Lattimer, Individually and as Next Friend of Shirley Mae Lattimer and Roger Lattimer, Incompetents; Arnold C. Mace; Donna S. Hickman; Nathan Sanchez; Larry Ferrell; Lauren Atkinson and Betty Miller v. The Honorable John D. ROCKEFELLER, IV, Governor of the State of West Virginia; Dr. L. Clark Hansbarger, Director, West Virginia Department of Health; Desmond

FILED Mar 31 2020, 10:55 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Jun 15 2016, 6:31 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), CLERK Indiana Supreme Court this Memorandum Decision shall not be Court of Appeals and Tax Court regarded as precedent or cited b

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 29 2019, 7:39 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2024 Term December 27, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

FILED Jun 16 2023, 9:31 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax C

OPINION The defendant, Dow Chemical Company (Dow or defendant), has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Terry DiPetrillo (Terry) and Donna DiPetrillo (Donna), following a jury award of $1 million to Terry as compensation for his injuries and $200,000 to Donna as compensation for her derivative loss of consortium. The jury found that Terry's injuries were proximately caused by an herbicide manufactured and sold by Dow. Following

Spina, J. This case is before us on a reservation and report from a single justice. We must determine the effect of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), on the sentencing of juvenile defendants1 convicted of murder in the first degree under G. L. c. 265, § l.2 In Miller, the Supreme Court

LINN, Circuit Judge. Timothy P. McCollum (“McCollum”) petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s (“Board”) final decisions denying his request for corrective action based on alleged retaliation for whistleblowing and affirming his removal for refusing a directed reassignment. McCollum v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin., No. AT-1221-02-0575-W-1 (M.

09/19/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 8, 2023 Session SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC., ET AL. v. NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 20C1054 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge _______

PROST, Circuit Judge. William A. O’Keefe (“O’Keefe”) petitions for review of the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”), No. PH-0752-00-0022-1-1, affirming the decision by the administrative judge that O’Keefe engaged in improper conduct, but reversing the judge’s mitigation of the agency’s penalty from removal to a sixty-day suspension. We have jurisdiction

Stoll, Circuit Judge. *1180 When the United States Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") affirms an examiner's rejection of a patent application, § 145 of the Patent Act permits the disappointed applicant to challenge the Board's decision in district cour

51 F.3d 901 Anthony Jerome HARRIS, Gary Middaugh, Theodore Ford, DoyleKing, Randy Meyer, Terry Crisp, Michael Farmer, JohnHoneycutt, Coy Hill, Troy Brown, Deems Rowell, GordonBunton, Adam Wright, Robert Manous, Kimball Foreman, JoeHeadrick, Terry Steward, Arthur Blackmon, James Smith,Stephen Ross, Johnny Smith, Larry Brown, Walter Robinson,Roger Williams, Kenneth Owens, Marshall Gee, Kelly Craig,Gilbert Payne, Danny Gree

[Cite as Saha v. Ohio State Univ., 2010-Ohio-5906.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215