Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “David R. Ratchford and Patricia A. Ratchford”
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 379A14 Filed 18 December 2015 KATHLEEN BEADNELL, RAYMOND BEADNELL, RICHARD BEMIS, DAWN BENNETT, MICHAEL BENNETT, DONNA BERRY, WILLIAM BERRY, JUDY BLOODWORTH, DARLENE BROYLES, WILLIAM BROYLES, PATRICIA CALDERONE, READ CALDERONE, JANET CAMERON, PAUL CAMERON, WAYNE CAMERON, MICHELE CARDNO, THOMAS CARDNO, JAMES CARY, JR., LISA CARY, JOSEPH CIPRIANI, KAREN CIPRIANI, CATHERINE COLELLA, CHARLES COLELLA
M.P. v. M.P.public domain
OPINION BY BENDER, J. M.P. (Mother) appeals from the order entered on November 15, 2011, prohibiting her from traveling with her and M.P.’s (Father) daughter, born in June of 2008, to Ecuador to visit with extended family for three weeks. We reverse. This present litigation began on July 14, 2011, when Mother filed a custody petition seeking permission to travel with her daughter to Ecuad
In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Propertiespublic domain
14‐2027 In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
Siliko v. Miami Univ.public domain
[Cite as Siliko v. Miami Univ., 2022-Ohio-4133.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY JENNIFER SILIKO, et al., : Appellants, : CASE NO. CA2021-12-162 : OPINION - vs -
14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club & Plantation, Inc., _ N.C. _, _ S.E.2d _ (2015) (375A14), the decision of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. Justice EDMUNDS concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons stated in his opinion in Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club & Plantation, Inc., _ N.C. _, _ S.E.2d. _ (2015) (3
Heafner v. City of Gastoniapublic domain
Heafner v. City of Gastonia, 2006 NCBC 17 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION GASTON COUNTY 06 CVS 788 RONALD M. HEAFNER, TAMMY G. HEAFNER, DANNY L. DAMERON, WILLIE B. DAMERON, ROY L. STOWE, BARRY W. STOWE, JR., STEPHANIE P. STOWE, BARRY W. STOWE, SR., CORDELIA M. STOWE, WILLIAM C. STOWE, DWAIN HINKLE, HARVEY L.
Campuzano v. Alavi Foundationpublic domain
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: On this appeal, we consider challenges to an award of summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, /.), which forfeited to the United States various claimants’ interests in multiple properties, including a 36-story office building located at 650 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan (“the Building”), real properties in Maryland, Texas, California, Virgini
Wilson v. Statepublic domain
814 A.2d 1 (2002) 148 Md. App. 601 Ismail M. WILSON, Travon McCoy and Robert Bryant v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1649, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 24, 2002. *5 Michael R. Braudes, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on the brief for appellant, Wilson
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Muhammad v. Statepublic domain
934 A.2d 1059 (2007) 177 Md. App. 188 John Allen MUHAMMAD v. STATE of Maryland. No. 0986, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 5, 2007. *1065 Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender and Brian M. Saccenti, Baltimore, for Appellant. Kathryn G. Graeff and Diane E. Keller (Douglas
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei