⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David Sanders”

Michigan Supreme Court · 2020-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 15, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 158789 (64)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
04/09/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 9, 2020 DAVID SANDERS V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 82033 David M. Bragg, Judge ___________________________________
Michigan Supreme Court · 2020-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 22, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice Da
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0064p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DAVID LEE SANDERS, │ Petitioner-Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 1× · 812 F.3d 1193; 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 85; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2467
Opinion by Judge LEAVY; Dissent by Judge GRABER. OPINION LEAVY, Senior Circuit Judge: David W. Sanders appeals the grant of summary judgment to his former employer, Energy Northwest, on his claims of retaliation in violation 42 U.S.C. § 5851 of the Energy Reorganization Act (“the Act”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Keenan v. Allan, 91 F.3
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EUGENE DAVID SANDERS, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2012-C-2804 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge ___________________________________
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 02 2018, 5:52 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-11-29 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Nov 29 2017, 8:41 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), CLERK this Memorandum Decision shall not be Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeal
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2008-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-07-0503-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 23, 2008 ______________________________ DAVID MCGARY a/k/a DAVID SANDERS,
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2008-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-07-0503-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 23, 2008 ______________________________ DAVID MCGARY a/k/a DAVID SANDERS,
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2008-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-07-0503-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 23, 2008 ______________________________ DAVID MCGARY a/k/a DAVID SANDERS,
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2008-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-08-0163-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 23, 2008 ______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF G.M., A MINOR CHILD _________________________________
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,368 EX PARTE DAVID T. MCGARY, AKA DAVID SANDERS, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 4006 IN THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARDEMAN COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,368
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA I N THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF No. 85114 DAVID B. SANDERS, BAR NO. 7895. FILE • 2022 TH A. 3R0'
Sanders v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Supreme Court · 2018-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 96 N.E.3d 577
Transfer denied. All Justices concur.
Sanders v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 112 N.E.3d 238
BRADFORD, J. Affirmed. BAILEY, J., Concurs. MATHIAS, J., Concurs.
Sanders v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-11-29 · Published · cited 0× · 94 N.E.3d 761
PYLE, J. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. BAKER, J., Concurs. MATHIAS, J., Concurs.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012-05-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-72,110-03
Sanders v. Sanderspublic domain
Indiana Supreme Court · 2017-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 108 N.E.3d 888
This matter has come before the Indiana Supreme Court on a petition to transfer jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rules 56(B) and 57, following the issuance of a decision by the Court of Appeals. The Court has reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals, and the submitted record on appeal, all briefs filed in the Court of Appeals, and all materials filed in connection with the request to transfer jurisdiction have been made available to the