Cases

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED112699 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc ) ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Opinion issued April 15, 2025 ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SC100790

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED111738 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Franklin County v. ) Cause No. 20AB-CR03303-01

USCA11 Case: 21-10954 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 05/18/2023 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10954 ____________________ DAVID THOMPSON,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DAVID THOMPSON II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D23-0252 [March 23, 2023] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID THOMPSON; AARON No. 17-35019 DOWNING; JIM CRAWFORD; DISTRICT 18 OF THE ALASKA REPUBLICAN D.C. No. PARTY, 3:15-cv-00218- Plaintiffs-Appellants, TMB v. OPINION HEATHER HEBDON, in Her Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Alaska Publi

L1AiE Po~ ~Jl-IFl23J'8: 11 ~ :• F."'~ r·~ r.r ~.. .·. , ' -- ·. - . &tJt :/: SlltJ611-'dr:, ) FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS P1~tf; ) TEXARKANA, TEXAS

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14-1316 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID M. THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DAVID THOMPSON II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-1195 [July 27, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. M

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 11, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A27D0006. NICOLE ROY et al v. DAVID THOMPSON. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this ord

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: David and Toni Thompson appeal a summary judgment dismissing their state-law claims against Bank of America (“BOA”) and U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”), arising from of the foreclosure on their home. They also appeal the exclusion of particular exhibits from the summary-judgment evidence. Because BOA did not waive its right to foreclose and made no actionable misrepresentations, we affirm.

Opinion filed July 9, 2009 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-08-00174-CV __________ DAN EDSWORTH GREER, Appellant V. DAVID THOMPSON, Appellee On Appeal from the 132nd

Opinion filed July 9, 2009

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 29, 2010 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00607-CV David Thompson, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00607-CV David Thompson, Appellant v. Melissa Banning, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 260390, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION A

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS October 25, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: David Thompson, Individually and as next friend of B. T., a minor v. Charles Farmer Appellate case number: 01-15-00064-CV Trial court case number: 2011-16031 Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County On January 14, 2015, appellant filed a mo

HJELM, J. [¶ 1] After David L. Thompson was charged with three drug-related crimes, he moved to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. Included in his motion was a request for the court to hold a Franks hearing 1 to allow him to challenge the truthfulness of the statements in the affi

99 F.3d 1157 U.J. Holcombv.David Thompson NO. 95-8744 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept 30, 1996 N.D.Ga., 87 F.3d 1330 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.