Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “David Wiggins”
Steven Carlson v. Justice David Wigginspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1374 ___________ Steven Carlson; Mary Granzow; Richard Kettells; William Ramsey, * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v.
CHIEF JUSTICE CAROLYN WRIGHT LISA MATZ JUSTICES CLERK OF THE COURT DAVID L. BRIDGES (214) 712-3450 MOLLY FRANCIS lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov DOUGLAS S. LANG
Wiggins v. Alabamapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, Chief Judge. The Scotland County Commission and Commissioners Charles Harris, Jr., David Wiggins, and Danette Clatt, in their official capacity (collectively “Scotland County”) appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Gavin Hauk on his petition for judicial review of Scotland County’s denial of Hauk’s application for a county health permit. We affi
Wiggins, Ex Parte David L.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,909<
Wiggins v. Wigginspublic domain
PITTMAN, Judge. Sherri Senn Wiggins (“the mother”) appeals from a judgment of the Barbour Circuit .Court (“the trial court”), modifying the custody rights of the mother and Ronnie D. Wiggins (“the father”). We dismiss the appeal as being from a nonfinal judgment. This is the second time these parties have been before this court. In Wiggins v. Wiggins (No. 2121102, September 5, 2014) — So.3d —— (Ala.C
Wiggins, Ex Parte David L.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,909 EX PARTE DAVID LEE WIGGINS, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 13,403 IN THE 52ND DISTRICT COURT FROM CORYELL COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article
Wiggins, Ex Parte David Leepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,877
Wiggins, Ex Parte David Leepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,877 EX PARTE DAVID LEE WIGGINS, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 0345183D IN THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TARRANT COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the T
Wiggins v. Hain Pure Protein Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. Plaintiff David Wiggins (“Wiggins”) brings this action against his former employer, Hain Pure Protein Corporation (“HPPC”), for breach of contract and violation of the New York Labor Law. Wiggins was fired in April of 2009 and seeks payment of a 2008 bonus, severance pay, rights in an equity plan, and payment for unused vacation. Following the close of
Wiggins v. Statepublic domain
BURKE, Judge. The appellant, David H. Wiggins, was convicted of murdering Kyle Cavins during the course of a robbery, an offense defined as capital by § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975, and for robbing Jonathan Beasley, a violation of § 13A-8-41, Ala.Code 1975. The jury recommended, by a vote of 10 to 2, that Wiggins be sentenced to death for the capital-murder conviction. The circuit court followed the jury’s recommendation <
Carlson v. Wigginspublic domain
760 F.Supp.2d 811 (2011) Steven CARLSON, Mary Graznow, Richard Kettells, and William Ramsey, Plaintiffs, v. Justice David WIGGINS,[1] in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Jean Dickson, Steven J. Pace, Beth Walker, Amy J. Skogerson, Joseph L. Fitzgibbons, Guy R. Cook, and H. Daniel Holm, Jr., in their official capacities as Elective Members of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Margare
State v. Wigginspublic domain
HASELTON, C. J. Defendant, who entered a conditional plea of no contest, ORS 135.335(3),1 for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, appeals the resulting judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence. We agree with defendant that she was stopped in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution2 no later th
Carlson v. Wigginspublic domain
675 F.3d 1134 (2012) Steven CARLSON; Mary Granzow; Richard Kettells; William Ramsey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Justice David WIGGINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Jean Dickson; Steven J. Pace; Beth Walker; Amy J. Skogerson; Joseph L. Fitzgibbons; Guy R. Cook; H. Daniel Holm, Jr., in their official capacities as Elective Members of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Margaret G. Redenbaugh
State v. Wigginspublic domain
788 N.W.2d 509 (2010) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Frank Irving WIGGINS, Appellant. No. A09-1987. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 14, 2010. *511 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Susan Gaertner, Ramsey County Attorney, Mitchell L. Rothman, Assistant County Attorney, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.
Wiggins v. Statepublic domain
CASANUEVA, Judge. David Wiggins appeals his sentences in thirteen cases following the revocation of community control in each one. We affirm on all issues except the award of his credit for time served. Pursuant to section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1995), Wiggins is entitled to credit for all of the time he spent in the county jail prior to his sentencing. See also State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Wigginspublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So.3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2
Wiggins v. Argent Mortgage Co.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NOS. 15, 51) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Argent Mortgage Company, LLC’s (“Argent”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 45) and Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company on Behalf of GS Mortgage Securities Corp. GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-10 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-10, Trent Thompson
Wiggins v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Greg N. Stivers, Judge United States District Court This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss the Claims of Certain Plaintiffs for Failure to Prosecute (DN 159) and Motion to Dismiss the Deceased Plaintiffs’ Claims (DN 160) by certain Defendants.1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS both motions. I. BACK
State of Iowa v. Sean David Gordonpublic domain
WIGGINS, Justice. *21 On appeal, for the first time, the defendant raised the issue that the court's use of risk assessment tools in sentencing the defendant violated his due process rights. The defendant also claimed the court used an unproven or unprosecuted offense when it sentenced him. We