Cases

Denied.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-909C Filed: December 14, 2020 CHARLES J. ADAMS, et al., Keywords: Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Plaintiffs, Motion for More Definite Statement; RCFC

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

NORTHCUTT, Judge. Mark Adams petitioned to dissolve his marriage to Laurette Adams in June 2008. The parties later mediated their disputes and reached an agreement settling their “respective rights, duties, and obligations regarding property.” They could not agree on child support and alimony, however, so they went to trial on those issues. The trial court entered a thorough posttrial order, which included an award of perman

JASKOL, J.** *4*174I. INTRODUCTION This case is before us a second time after the Supreme Court granted review and transferred the case back with directions to vacate our original opinion and reconsider our decisio

TIM McCORMACK, J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Haven Realty, Inc. d.b.a. Re/Max Property Management (incorrectly identified as "Relmax," but henceforth in this opinion identified as "Re/Max") appeals from the trial court's judgment ordering it to return a security deposit in the amount of $625 to plaintiff-appellee Adria Adams ("Adams"). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Stay denied. Writ denied.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

WELBAUM, J. *1140 {¶ 1} This case is before us on the appeal of Defendant-Appellant, David Adams, from his conviction under R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(d) for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs ("OVI"). Primarily, Adams challenges the trial court's rulings on his motion to suppress an

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

BENHAM, Justice. The parties to this appeal were previously a couple, though unmarried. Appellant Adam Vargo purchased the real property in which the parties formerly resided in his own name as sole owner, and executed a purchase money mortgage on it. Shortly thereafter, Vargo executed a warranty deed conveying the property to himself and appellee Brittany E. Adams as joint tenants with the right of survi-vorship. The couple b

SERCOMBE, P. J. Plaintiff appeals a judgment in favor of defendant, assigning error to the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs negligence claim. Plaintiff was injured in a single-car accident while defendant, her minor son, was driving. Plaintiff filed a claim against defendant in which she alleged that she was injured as a result of his negligent driving. Defendant filed a motion for s

*1029ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of March 2017 by Defendant to Stay and Legal Notice:"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of March 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

*1029ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

*1029ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.