Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ruben Castillo, Chief Judge • Tonya Davis (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Ernest B. Fenton, the Law Office of Ernest B. Fenton, P.C. (“the Law Office”), and Legal Services, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of' the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., and the- Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982; attorney ma

POSNER, Circuit Judge. In 2013 Tonya Davis sued Ernest Fen-ton (as well as Fenton’s law firms) in federal district court asserting state malpractice and breach of contract claims, as well as federal Fair Housing Act and Civil Rights Act claims, all arising out of Fen-ton’s representation of Davis in a mortgage foreclosure action in which Davis had lost her home. Davis alleged th

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Percival Norman Fenton seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1672 Filed November 8, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. COREY ROBERT FENTON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Samantha Gronewald, Judge. Defendant appeals his sentences for convictions of possession of a controlled substance, se

BRADY, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (May 13, 2015) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the People’s Motion to Detain Defendant, filed August 4, 2014 (“Motion to Detain”); the People’s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion to Detain, filed February 20, 2015 (“Supplemental Memo”); the People’s Motion to Revoke Stipulated Pretrial Release Order, filed February 20, 201

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns the conditions under which a defendant may remove a case to federal court pursuant to the civil rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1443. We conclude that § 1443 was not satisfied in this case, and therefore affirm the district court’s remand order. I. Background In 2010, Tonya Davis ret

312 N.W.2d 524 (1981) Woodrow L. WILSON and Patricia A. Wilson, Plaintiffs, v. Honorable Ray A. FENTON, of the Iowa District Court for Decatur County, Defendant. No. 64973. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 25, 1981. *526 Richard C. Turner, West Des Moines, for plaintiffs. Jonathan C. Wilson and Steven L. Nelson, of Davis, H

491 F.Supp. 1020 (1980) Richard PICARIELLO et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles E. FENTON, Jr. et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 79-317. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. May 7, 1980. As Amended July 25, 1980. *1021 Steven Ney, Washington, D. C., Edward I. Koren, Amherst, N. Y., Alvin J. Bronstein, National

491 F.Supp. 1026 (1980) Richard PICARIELLO et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles E. FENTON, Warden, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 79-317. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. May 7, 1980. *1027 Steven Ney, Washington, D. C., Edward I. Koren, Amherst, N. Y., Alvin J. Bronstein, National Prison Project, Washington, D. C., John

OPINION BAKER, Judge. Appellant-plaintiff Keybank, f/k/a Society National Bank, Indiana (Keybank) ap*1148peals the trial court's decision to grant relief to appellee-defendant Candice Davis. Specifically, Keybank argues that Candice waived any claim of deficient service of process by failing to assert such a defense in her first motion to set a

Six-year-old Shawn Davis seeks to impose liability on the City of Evansville and its Animal Control department for injuries sustained when he was attacked in his neighborhood by a Rottweiler. We conclude that Davis's claim is that the City failed to enforce its Animal Control Ordinance. Because the Indiana Tort Claims Act provides immunity to governmental entities for any loss resulting from the failure to enforce a law, Davis cannot recover from the City in these circumstances. <

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Fenton v. City of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 111596 Appellate Court JAMES FENTON, Special Administrator for the Estate of Henry Fenton, Caption Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Fourth Divisi

Hudgins, C. J., delivered the opinion of the court. This writ of error is to an order probating the following paper writing as the holograph will of Cortelyou H. Warren. “1-31-47 “To whom it may concern— “Being of sound mind & body— “I will.

SELYA, Circuit Judge. A federal grand jury in the District of Maine indicted defendant-appellant Coleman J. Fenton, Jr. on thirty-four counts stemming from his involvement in a drug-trafficking conspiracy. Following his conviction on thirty-one counts and the imposition of sentence, Fenton appeals. He mounts a multi-dimensional challenge, claiming (i) that a prejudicial variance oc

MANNHEIMER, Judge. Each of the appellants in this case visited a Fairbanks residence while the police were executing a search warrant for the premises. The officers searched each of the appellants as they arrived, and the officers found cocaine on each appellant. Each of the appellants was indicted for possession of cocaine (fourth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance), AS 11.71.040(a). Foll

Ireland, J. Pursuant to a 1993 plea agreement, the defendant pleaded delinquent by reason of murder in the first degree, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm without a license. The defendant was sentenced to from fifteen to twenty years, *32pursuant to G. L. c. 119, § 72, as amended through St. 1992, c. 398, § 4, twenty years being the maximum under the statute.

2005-NMCA-138 HSBC BANK USA as Trustee, Plaintiff, v. LISA L. FENTON, a/k/a LISA LYNN FENTON; MARK FENTON; JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, True Names Unknown Tenants, Defendants. CLARKE CAGLE, by substitution in place and instead of DANIEL E. HUDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, VISTA DE LA CUMBRE, Petitioner-Appellee. Docket No. 24,974. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. Filing Date: May

297 N.W.2d 294 (1980) Wayne E. FENTON, Relator, v. MURPHY MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., Self-Insured, Respondent, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas, Health and Welfare Fund, Intervenor, Respondent. No. 51037. Supreme Court of Minnesota. September 5, 1980. Rehearing Denied October 15, 1980. Kelly, Torrison & O'Neill, St. Paul, fo

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]). Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish the element of *922forcible compulsion. By failing to object on that ground, defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review (see, People v Gray, </

2023 IL App (1st) 211373 SECOND DIVISION December 29, 2023 No. 1-21-1373 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ANDREW DAVIS and JAIRAME DAVIS, as Independent