Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Davis v. New York State Department of Corrections”
People ex rel. Davis v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervisionpublic domain
Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied [see 26 NY3d 907 (2015)].
People ex rel. Davis v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervisionpublic domain
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted (see People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from a Judgment [denominated order] of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Michael M. Mohun, A.J. — Habeas Corpus). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Sconiers, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.
People ex rel. Davis v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervisionpublic domain
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted (see People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from a Judgment [denominated order] of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Michael M. Mohun, A.J. — Habeas Corpus). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Sconiers, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.
Davis v. State of New York Department of Correctionspublic domain
OPINION & ORDER Seibel, U.S.D.J. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 Plaintiff Melvin Davis, an African-American man, has been employed by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DO
Davis v. New Yorkpublic domain
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Samuel Davis appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., Magistrate Judge), granting summary judgment for appellees and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, and from interlocutory orders (Carol E. Heckman, Magistrate Judge) denying Davis’s preliminary injunction motion and motion to file a sup
Davis v. New Yorkpublic domain
316 F.3d 93 Samuel DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.State of NEW YORK; George Pataki, Governor; New York State Department of Correctional Services; Glenn Goord, Commissioner; Attica Correctional Facility; Walter R. Kelly, Superintendent; Officer Stachewicz, Corr. Sergeant; Ron Christen,1 Correction Officer; Marty McDonald, Correction Officer; Mary Barone, Correction Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Denisha Davis (“Davis”), brings disparate impact and disparate treatment claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000(e) et seq. (“Title VII”). The defendants, the State of Connecticut Department of Correction (“DOC”) and State of Connecticut Department of Administrative Services (“DAS”), have moved to dismiss the complaint. For
Davis v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Davis v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 06466) Davis v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 06466 Decided on November 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Matter of Davis (State of New York Off. of Mental Health) (2025 NY Slip Op 03910) Matter of Davis (State of New York Off. of Mental Health) 2025 NY Slip Op 03910 Decided on June 27, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hayden, J.), entered June 3, 2016 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner
Clark, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Board of Parole revoking petitioner’s parole. Petitioner was convicted, upon his guilty plea, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and seventh degrees. After his te
DAVIS, TYRONE v. STATE OF NEW YORKpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 372 CA 15-01539 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR DISCHARGE OF TYRONE DAVIS, CONSECUTIVE NO. 177513, FROM CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER PURSUANT TO MENTAL HYGIENE LAW SECTION 10.09, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V ORDER STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK ST
Loney v. New York State Department of Correctionspublic domain
632 F.Supp.2d 337 (2009) Jermaine LONEY, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. No. 08 Civ. 7026 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 2009. *340 Jermaine Loney, Gowanda, NY, pro se. DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Pro se petition
Davis v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Phyllis Orlikoff Flug, J.), dated October 7, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the causes of action alleging assault and battery and negligent hiring, retention, and supervision, and for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging wron
Bonneau v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
Bonneau v State of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 03699) Bonneau v State of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 03699 Decided on June 18, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. T
Department of Commerce v. New Yorkpublic domain
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2561The Secretary of Commerce decided to reinstate a question about citizenship on the 2020 census questionnaire. A group of plaintiffs challenged that decision on constitutional and statutory grounds. We now decide whether the Secretary violated the Enumeration Clause of the Const
Tchiyuka v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
Tchiyuka v State of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 23423) [*1] Tchiyuka v State of New York 2023 NY Slip Op 23423 Decided on December 31, 2023 Court Of Claims Chaudhry, J. Published by New York State Law Report
Cumberland v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
Cumberland v State of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 02916) Cumberland v State of New York 2023 NY Slip Op 02916 Decided on June 1, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
DAVIS, TYRONE v. STATE OF NEW YORKpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 386 CA 11-02113 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF TYRONE DAVIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V ORDER STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.) D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (
Sacher v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
Sacher v State of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 07087) Sacher v State of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 07087 Decided on December 14, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La