Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.

Davis v New York City Tr. Auth. (2024 NY Slip Op 06652) Davis v New York City Tr. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 06652 Decided on December 31, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

Davis v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 06466) Davis v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 06466 Decided on November 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

Davis v State of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 06591) Davis v State of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 06591 Decided on November 18, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Davis v New York Schs. Ins. Reciprocal (2024 NY Slip Op 00998) Davis v New York Schs. Ins. Reciprocal 2024 NY Slip Op 00998 Decided on February 28, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

Davis v State of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 00662) Davis v State of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 00662 Decided on February 5, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua

Wray-Davis v New York Methodist Hosp. (2020 NY Slip Op 04428) Wray-Davis v New York Methodist Hosp. 2020 NY Slip Op 04428 Decided on August 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law R

Davis v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 02910) Davis v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 02910 Decided on April 26, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

Davis v New York City Hous. Auth. (2019 NY Slip Op 03567) Davis v New York City Hous. Auth. 2019 NY Slip Op 03567 Decided on May 8, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Phyllis Orlikoff Flug, J.), dated October 7, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the causes of action alleging assault and battery and negligent hiring, retention, and supervision, and for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging wron

1st Dept: 137 AD3d 716 denied

Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Milano, J.), entered April 21, 2016, which, among other things, granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the claim. Claimant, an inmate, commenced this negligence action alleging that defendant failed to provide him with adequate *1

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Genovesi, J.), dated December 1, 2015, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1), granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant City of New

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Mignano, J.) dated August 6, 2014, which, upon a decision of the same court dated July 10, 2014, made after a trial on the issue of damages, finding that the claimant sustained damages in the principal sums of $475,000 for past pain and suffering and $250,000 for future pa

Affirmed 09791 May Term 2014 (Montgomery)

Lahtinen, J.R Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Milano, J.), entered June 6, 2014, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim. Claimant commenced this action alleging, among other things, that the Board of Parole failed to personally interview him as required by Executive Law § 259-i (2) (a) (i) before making its 2013 decision denying

OPINION OF THE COURT Howard H. Heckman Jr., J. It is ordered that this motion by plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon, seeking an order: (1) granting summary judgment striking the answer of the defendants Ann Marie Davis and The Ann Marie Davis Revocable Living Trust by Ann Marie Davis as trustee; (2) discontinuing the action against defendants designated as “John Does” and “Jane Does”; (3) deeming all a

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 372 CA 15-01539 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR DISCHARGE OF TYRONE DAVIS, CONSECUTIVE NO. 177513, FROM CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER PURSUANT TO MENTAL HYGIENE LAW SECTION 10.09, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V ORDER STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK ST

SUMMARY ORDER Incarcerated pro se plaintiff Willie Davis appeals the dismissal of his complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and charging defendants with violating Davis’s due process and Eighth Amendment rights insofar as they allegedly failed to deliver a package mailed to Davis and subjected him to *399excessive force in a confrontation about the package. We