Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION, AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, filed May 28, 2015 (Doc. 9)(“PFRD”); (ii) the Objections to Review Portal to Portal Act, State v. Reyes,

ACCEPTED 03-15-00313-CV 6015790 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

ACCEPTED 03-15-00313-CV 7078401 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INNOVATION LAW LAB; CENTRAL No. 19-15716 AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CENTRO D.C. No. LEGAL DE LA RAZA; UNIVERSITY OF 3:19-cv-00807- SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW RS IMMIGRATION AND DEPORTATION DEFENSE CLINIC; AL OTRO LADO; TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHAD

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INNOVATION LAW LAB; CENTRAL No. 19-15716 AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CENTRO D.C. No. LEGAL DE LA RAZA; UNIVERSITY OF 3:19-cv-00807- SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW RS IMMIGRATION AND DEPORTATION DEFENSE CLINIC; AL OTRO LADO; TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHAD

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1927 Doc: 119 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1721 Doc: 130 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM

733 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2010) PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. S-09-1750 LKK/JFM. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 5, 2010. *1174 David Young, Law Offices of David Young, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The United States1 appeals a preliminary injunction, pending trial, forbidding implementation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans -and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”). Twenty-six states (the “states”2) challenged DAPA under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution;

Case: 15-40238 Document: 00513054621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals __________ Fifth Circuit FILED May 2

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants are three health-benefit plans (“HBPs”) that brought suit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (“RICO”), and various state laws, claiming that Defendants-Appellees sano-fi-aventis U.S. LLP and sanofi-aventis U.S., Inc. (collectively, “Aventis”) engaged

CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER1 KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...596 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .. .597 A. Pre-Trial Proceedings ... 597 B. The Trial ... 600 III. FINDINGS OF FACT ... 601 A. Public Health Issues Associated w

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to enjoin the use of arbitrary government action that benefits private commercial interests and developers within Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen City of Houston, Texas (“TIRZ117”) at the expense of substantial

UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant J.M. Sharkey’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. I: Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Illegal Seizure Claim (Count I) Based on Qualified Immunity, filed July 30, 2013 (Doc. 92) (“MSJ No. 1”). The Court held a hearing on Septemb

ACCEPTED 04-14-00746-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/2/2015 3:53:38 PM

OPINION AND ORDER PESQUERA, District Judge. The present action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and a writ of mandamus. Jurisdiction is claimed under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The instant case raises important questions as to the interaction between the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. and the Veterans Educational Benefits Act, 38 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Plaintiff Milton

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I

586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e