Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “DeBlasio v. The City of New York”
DeBlasio v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Michael D. Stallman, J. Motions bearing sequence Nos. 007 and 008 are consolidated for disposition. In motion sequence No. 007, petitioner the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association (COBA) moves, pursuant to CPLR 901, for an order certifying itself as the class representative of all COBA tier 3 members hired between July 26, 1976 and December 19, 1990, who ret
Crew III, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 21, 1996, which ruled that claimant’s current condition was not related to his employment. In March 1984, claimant sustained an injury to his left arm while lifting a heavy object at work. Claimant subsequently began exhibiting symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, which eventually worsened to the point that claimant became totally
Dorce v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
20-1809-cv Dorce v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: January 27, 2021 Decided: June 23, 2021 Docket No. 20-1809-cv MCCONNELL DORCE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CECILIA JONES, individually and on beh
Matter of Husamudeen v. DeBlasiopublic domain
Matter of Husamudeen v DeBlasio (2020 NY Slip Op 01165) Matter of Husamudeen v DeBlasio 2020 NY Slip Op 01165 Decided on February 19, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Milo v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction.517 II.Facts.:.518 III. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) Judgment on the Pleadings Standard.520 IV. Law.520 A. Statute.•.520 B. Municipal Liability Standard .520 C. False Arrest and F
Matter of Neighbors United Below Canal v. deBlasiopublic domain
Matter of Neighbors United Below Canal v deBlasio (2021 NY Slip Op 01947) Matter of Neighbors United Below Canal v deBlasio 2021 NY Slip Op 01947 Decided on March 30, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published
DeBlasio v. Sinclairpublic domain
[Cite as DeBlasio v. Sinclair, 2012-Ohio-5848.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT AL RHODES, PERSONAL ) REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE ) OF HENRY A. DIBLASIO, ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) CASE NO
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 02369) IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 02369 Decided on May 02, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Moulton, J. Publish
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 02369) IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 02369 Decided on May 02, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Moulton, J. Publish
Uniformed Fire Officers Association v. DeBlasiopublic domain
20-2400-cv Uniformed Fire Officers Association v. DeBlasio UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 Motion Argued: August 18, 2020 Motion Decided: August 27, 2020 Docket No. 20-2400 ------------------------------------------ UNIFORMED FIRE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCI
Matter of Coney Is. Boardwalk Community Gardens v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 04162) Matter of Coney Is. Boardwalk Community Gardens v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 04162 Decided on May 29, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department
B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge. Robert Vargas appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, /.) dismissing, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York alleging violations of equal protection and due process arising from his termination by the New York
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 05870) IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 05870 Decided on October 23, 2025 Court of Appeals Garcia, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
Quinteros v. P. Deblasio, Inc.public domain
The plaintiff was an employee of a brick mason who had been hired as a subcontractor by the defendant general contractor E Debiasio, Inc., and the defendant Debiasio & Capo Froperties, Inc., doing business as Debiasio Capo Design Builders (hereinafter together the defendants), to extend the chimney on the roof of a private residence. The plaintiff alleges that he was injured when a scaffold upon which he was standing, which had been erected alongside
ShuttleCloud Corp. v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. (2021 NY Slip Op 05407) ShuttleCloud Corp. v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. 2021 NY Slip Op 05407 Decided on October 07, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department
ShuttleCloud Corp. v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. (2021 NY Slip Op 05407) ShuttleCloud Corp. v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. 2021 NY Slip Op 05407 Decided on October 07, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department
Henderson v. New York City Transit Authoritypublic domain
Rose, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 17, 2007, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury and disallowed her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. After claimant had worked for nearly 20 years as a New York City bus driver, she alleged that her recurring exposure to exhaust fumes and dust in the course of her work had caused her to de
Williams v. New York City Housing Authoritypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Acosta, J. Introduction This appeal presents us with the opportunity to construe for the first time the Local Civil Rights Restoration Act of 2005 (Local Law No. 85 [2005] of City of NY [Restoration Act]). Defendants’ summary judgment motion—addressed to an amended complaint alleging a hostile work environment, disparate treatment on the basis o
Glorioso v. DeBlasiopublic domain
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated *589October 26, 1994, which denied his motion for leave to file an amended complaint to add a cause of action for treble damages pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Althoug
Beachum v. AWISCO New Yorkpublic domain
785 F.Supp.2d 84 (2011) Kyer L. BEACHUM, Plaintiff, v. AWISCO NEW YORK and Local 810, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 7399(RJS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 16, 2011. *88 Neal Brickman, Esq., and Richard Norman Jefferson, Esq., The Law Offices of Norman Brickman, New York, NY