⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dealer Computer Services, Incorporated v. Dub Herring Ford”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-10-14 · Published · cited 12× · 623 F.3d 348; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21167; 2010 WL 4008141
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge, dissenting. Dealer Computer Services, Inc. (“DCS”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its Motion to Confirm the arbitrators’ award finding that Dub Herring Ford and the proposed class of automobile dealers whom it represents (collectively, the “Dealers”) should not be allowed to go forward with their arbitration as a class arbitration. The district court found tha
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007-05-29 · Published · cited 3× · 489 F. Supp. 2d 772; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38530; 2007 WL 1560204
489 F.Supp.2d 772 (2007) DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DUB HERRING FORD, et al., Defendants. No. 07-10263. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 29, 2007. *773 *774 John C. Allen, John C. Allen Assoc., Houston, TX, Rebecca S. Davies, Foster, Swift,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-11-18 · Published · cited 26× · 547 F.3d 558; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23707; 2008 WL 4911169
547 F.3d 558 (2008) DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUB HERRING FORD, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1819. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 21, 2008. Decided and Filed: November 18, 2008. *559 ARGUED: John C. Allen, Houston, Texas, for Appellant. Richard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0405p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - DEALER COMPUTER SERVICE
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011-11-03 · Published · cited 1× · 829 F. Supp. 2d 1324; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131344; 2011 WL 5386428
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Southern Communications Services, Inc., D/B/A SouthernLINC Wireless’ (“SouthernLINC”) Motion to Vacate [Doc. 1] two arbitration awards: a Clause Construction Award and a Class Determination Award. By issuing these two awards, the arbitrator answered two questions the parties submitted to him in turn: 1) whether t
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985-06-03 · Published · cited 49× · 761 F.2d 345
CUMMINGS, Chief Judge. In September 1980, thirteen independently owned drugstores located in various southern Wisconsin towns sued defendant Walgreen Company, an Illinois corporation which operates company-owned drugstores throughout the United States. Prior to October 1, 1980, it also sold its and others’ drug, beauty aid and hous
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 312 F. Supp. 3d 668
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE *670This matter is before the Court upon Defendant The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Christopher Yerington's Amended Complaint ("Lincoln's Motion") (Doc. 20). The motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, Lincoln's Motion is GRANTED
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-06-27 · Published · cited 7× · 756 F.3d 911; 2014 WL 2898529; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123
OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the issue of whether the district court had ancillary jurisdiction over Stacey Field’s motion to expunge the record of her arrest. In 2000, Field was indicted on charges of receipt of stolen property and aiding and abetting a bank robbery after the fact. After the district court granted Fie
Boler v. Earleypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017-07-28 · Published · cited 244× · 865 F.3d 391; 2017 WL 3202778
OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. These two cases arise from the water contamination crisis in Flint, Michigan. Plaintiffs, residents of Flint affected by the contaminated city water, bring suit against various state and local officials and entities, alleging violation of their constitutional rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with other claims. In Boler, the district court determined
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-04-27 · Published · cited 1379× · 176 L. Ed. 2d 605; 130 S. Ct. 1758; 559 U.S. 662; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3672; 2010 A.M.C. 913; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 269; 78 U.S.L.W. 4328
*688Justice Ginsburg, with whom Justice Stevens and Justice Breyer join, dissenting. When an arbitration clause is silent on the question, may arbitration proceed on behalf of a class? The Court prematurely takes up that important question and, indulging in de novo review, overturns the ruling of experienced arbitrators.1
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012-03-26 · Published · cited 2× · 863 F. Supp. 2d 701; 2012 WL 1022034
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TAXATION OF COSTS AND AWARDING COSTS SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff James Allen Frye (“Frye”) brought this action claiming that Defendant Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. (“Baptist”) had violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., by failing to compensate him and similarly situated hourly employees for time worked d
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0167p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 16-1684 ┐ BEATRICE BOLER; EDWIN ANDERSON; ALLINA │ ANDERSON; EPCO SALES, LLC, │
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-09-11 · Published · cited 19× · 693 F.3d 665; 2012 WL 3931802; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19023
BATCHELDER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which NORRIS, J., joined, and STRANCH, J., joined in Sections I. and II.A. STRANCH, J. (pp. 678-81), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. At its core, an insurance policy is simply a contract between the insurer and the insured, with each entitled to the ben
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011-10-05 · Published · cited 0×
ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2011 FED App. 0012P (6th Cir.) File Name: 11b0012p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: RICHARD K. MILLER, ) ) Debtor. ) _____________________________________ ) ) ) STATE BANK OF FLORENC
California Court of Appeal · 2002-01-08 · Published · cited 66× · 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 25; 95 Cal. App. 4th 952; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1225; 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 160
116 Cal.Rptr.2d 25 (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 952 Paul R. EMERY, Jr., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. C036193. Court of Appeal, Third District. January 8, 2002. *29 Law Office of Richard Ellers and Richard F. Ellers, Nevada City, for Pla
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011-10-05 · Published · cited 18× · 459 B.R. 657; 2011 WL 5528264
459 B.R. 657 (2011) In re Richard K. MILLER, Debtor. State Bank of Florence, Appellant, v. Richard K. Miller, Appellee. BAP No. 11-8011. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 16, 2011. Decided and Filed: October 5, 2011. *660 ARGUED: Gregory P. Seibold, Seibold Law Firm
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-12-22 · Published · cited 83× · 150 A.3d 1213
Ruiz, Senior Judge: These appeals present us with legal issues of first impression concerning the special motion to dismiss created by the District of Columbia’s Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Anti-SLAPP) Act, D.C. Code §§ 16-5501 to - 5505 (2012 Repl.): whether denial of a special motion to dismiss is immediately appealable and the standard applicable in
District Court, D. Maine · 2004-07-13 · Published · cited 5× · 324 F. Supp. 2d 257; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13048; 2004 WL 1570086
324 F.Supp.2d 257 (2004) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DARLING'S d/b/a Darling's Auto Mall, Defendant. No. CIV.01-151-B-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 13, 2004. *258 Daniel L. Goldberg, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Boston, MA, Frederick J. Badger, Jr., Richardson, Whitman, Large & Badger, Bangor, ME, Ja
State v. Carrpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014-07-25 · Published · cited 125× · 300 Kan. 1; 331 P.3d 544; 2014 WL 3681049; 2014 Kan. LEXIS 432
The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam,: Defendant Reginald Dexter Carr, Jr., and his brother, Jonathan D. Carr, were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for crimes committed in a series of three incidents in December 2000 in Wichita. This is R. Carr’s direct appeal from his 50 convictions and 4 death sentences. In the first incident on December 7 and 8, Andrew S
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, on behalf of her minor child K.N., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00070 (TNM) BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is about who must ensure that a disabled ch