Cases

USCA11 Case: 22-10575 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 07/07/2023 Page: 1 of 92 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10575 ____________________ GEORGE TERSHAKOVEC, D

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE APPRAISAL OF PANERA ) BREAD COMPANY ) C.A. No. 2017-0593-MTZ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: October 7, 2019 Date Decided: January 31, 2020 Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Elizabeth A. DeFelice, and Melissa N. Donimirski, HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal is part of the continuing sage of the corrugated container antitrust litigation. In the cases now before us the plaintiffs appeal a jury verdict absolving defendants from liability for damages for antitrust violations. Plaintiffs contend that they were entitled to a judgment non ob-stante veredicto or new trial and that they are entitled to injunctive relief against future violation

756 F.2d 411 1985-1 Trade Cases 66,525, 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1049 In re CORRUGATED CONTAINER ANTITRUST LITIGATION.ANCHOR HOCKING, et al. and Dean Foods Company, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross Appellees,v.ALTON BOX BOARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants,Container Corporation of America, et al.,Defendants-Appellees Cross Appellants.ANCHOR HOCKING, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CONTA

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This case should serve as a reminder to employers of their obligation to keep their workplaces free of discriminatory harassment. Although much of what happened here was characterized as “jokes,” neither the discrimination nor the jury verdict is a laughing matter. Troy Swinton, a worker in the shipping department of a cardboard company, was subject to repe

662 F.3d 423 (2011) Carolyn TUREK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC. and Kellogg Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-3267. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 9, 2011. Decided October 17, 2011. *424 Ronald W. Teeple (argued), Attorney, Teeple, Leonard & Erdman, Chicago, I

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge. Presently before the court are two motions to dismiss the complaint brought by Par Sterile Products, LLC, against the Defendants American Regent, Inc., Hospi-ra, Inc., and International Medical Systems, Ltd. The complaint alleges false or misleading advertising and labeling, based on the Lanham

OPINION BLOCK, District Judge: John Thomas Entler (“Entler” or “Appellant”) is a prisoner at the Washington State Penitentiary (“WSP”). During the summer of 2012, he took issue with certain incidents at the WSP and submitted written complaints to the prison officials involved.

Wiggins, J. ¶53 (dissenting) — When citizens legislate through the initiative process, they are held to the same standards as our elected lawmakers. When corporations legislate by initiative, we must also hold them to those same standards. ¶54 Article II, section 19 of our state constitution declares: No bill shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the titl

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAYING CASE CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Genevieve Meyer has brought a putative class action against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”), alleging four causes of action relating to T-Mobile’s assessment of state and federal surcharges on its bills to subscribers for mobile telephone services. See generally Rivas Decl.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION No. 13-17123 NETWORK; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 1:12-cv-00594- SOM-RLP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF OPINION COMMERCE; NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE; WILBUR L. ROSS, in his officia

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of ¡ontents I. Introduction..................... ......................................38 II. Facts. III. Pending Litigation and Administrative Proceedings ..........................42 A. Litigation...........................................................42

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ZAYN AL-ABIDIN MUHAMMAD No. 18-35218 HUSAYN; JOSEPH MARGULIES, Petitioners-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00171- v. JLQ JAMES ELMER MITCHELL; JOHN JESSEN, OPINION Respondents, UNITE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE HYUNDAI AND KIA FUEL No. 15-56014 ECONOMY LITIGATION, D.C. No. 2:13-ml-02424- KEHLIE R. ESPINOSA; NICOLE MARIE GW-FFM HUNTER; JEREMY WILTON; KAYLENE P. BRADY; GUNTHER KRAUTH; ERIC GRAEWINGHOLT; REECE PHILIP THOMSON; ALEX MATURANI; NILUFAR REZAI; JACK ROTTNER; LYDIA KIEVIT; REBECCA SANDERS; BOBBY BRANDON ARMSTRON

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion in which Judge NIEMEYER joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate concurring opinion. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This is the latest in a series of appeals in copyright infringement cases arising out of the design and use of the logo for the Baltimore Ravens football team. In *3

229 P.3d 735 (2010) 168 Wash.2d 444 Armen YOUSOUFIAN, Respondent, v. The OFFICE OF RON SIMS, King County, Executive, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation; the King County Department of Finance, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation; and the King County Department of Stadium Administration, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation, Petitioners. No. 80081-2.

278 P.3d 632 (2012) 174 Wn.2d 642 WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION, a Washington nonprofit corporation; David Grumbois, an individual, Appellants, and Gruss, Inc., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. STATE of Washington, Respondent, and John McKay, Bruce Beckett, Costco Wholesale Corporation, The Yes On 1183 Coalition, Washington Restaurant Association, MacKay Restaurant Group,

153 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2001) Heidi OTT A.G. and Heidi Ott, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION; the Brass Key, Inc.; Unimax Toys Limited; Unimax Toys (USA), Inc.; and John Pellegrene; Defendants. No. CIV 99-1170 (PAMJGL). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 8, 2001. *1056 *1057

738 F.Supp. 1166 (1990) AUGUST, BISHOP & MEIER, INC., and First National Insurance Co., Plaintiffs, v. The PREMIUM LINK, LTD., Defendant. No. 90 C 431. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. May 15, 1990. *1167 Nicholas F. Esposito, Terence M. Heuel, Mark A. Schramm, Esposito & Heuel, Chicago, Ill., for plainti