⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Deans v. Artrip”

Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001-08-17 · Published · cited 14× · 54 S.W.3d 169; 2001 Ky. App. LEXIS 591; 2001 WL 930001
54 S.W.3d 169 (2001) Mitchell ARTRIP, Appellant, v. SAMONS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee. No. 2000-CA-001615-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. August 17, 2001. Gordon J. Dill, Ashland, KY, Brief for Appellant. John M. Winans, Ashland, KY, Brief for Appellee. Before GUDGEL, Chief Judge; COMBS and JOHNSON, Judges. OPINION VACATING AND R
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 957 F. Supp. 2d 1320; 2013 WL 3712330; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97488
MEMORANDUM OPINION T. MICHAEL PUTNAM, United States Magistrate Judge. This cause is before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants on July 19, 2012. (Doc. 86). In that motion, all remaining defendants,1 the Madison County School Board, Ronnie J. Blair, Jeanne Dunaway, and Teresa G. Terrell, seek judgment in their favor and dismissal of p
Jenkins v. Pylespublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005-04-22 · Published · cited 46× · 611 S.E.2d 404; 269 Va. 383; 2005 Va. LEXIS 50
611 S.E.2d 404 (2005) 269 Va. 383 Clarence W. JENKINS v. Daymion Wayne PYLES, et al. Record No. 041892. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 22, 2005. *405 Bradford M. Young (The Chandler Law Group, on briefs), Charlottesville, for appellant. Humes J. Franklin, III (Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver, on br
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 346 F. Supp. 2d 1203; 2004 WL 2677686
346 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2004) Willie BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. RENT-A-CENTER EAST, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:03cv0697-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. November 3, 2004. Order Denying Motion to Amend November 23, 2004. *1204 Eric James Artrip, Watson Jimmerson, Rebekah Keith Mc
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003-09-30 · Published · cited 7× · 115 S.W.3d 441; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1543; 2003 WL 22231718
115 S.W.3d 441 (2003) TELTECH, INC. and Shane and Carmen Jarvis; Stephanie Gail Hazelton and Hazelton & Laner, LLP., Respondents, v. TELTECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.; Defendants, Dillon Schramm Associates Ltd., Dillon Schramm & Associates Ltd., Richard L. Dillon, Appellants. No. WD 62140. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 30, 2003.
Sullivan v. Rixeypublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 241 Va. 512; 403 S.E.2d 346; 7 Va. Law Rep. 2357; 1991 Va. LEXIS 56
JUSTICE WHITING delivered the opinion of the Court. In this personal injury case, we decide whether a plaintiff can show the potential bias of two witnesses by requiring them to disclose that they were employed by or on behalf of the defendant’s insurance company. One witness was presented by the plaintiff and the other by the defendant. On October 31, 1987, Shirley Sullivan, a front-seat passe
Virginia Circuit Court · 2002-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 60 Va. Cir. 199; 2002 Va. Cir. LEXIS 267
By Judge Charles E. Poston Today the Court grants the motions for summary judgment submitted on behalf of Defendants Central Locating Service (“CLS”) and NoCuts, Inc. (“NoCuts”) and dismisses the Plaintiff’s actions against them. In addition, the Court grants Defendant Dominion Virginia Power’s (“Dominion”) motion for summary judgment in part, dismissing the count against Dominion for failure to mark the power line. In keepi
In re S. Childrenpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 Ohio 4934
[Cite as In re S. Children, 2015-Ohio-4934.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: IN RE: S. CHILDREN : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. :
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988-03-08 · Published · cited 4× · 841 F.2d 694; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2940; 1988 WL 18433
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant, Samuel Hardin, appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of making false entries in the Board of Directors’ minutes of the Watauga Valley Bank and making false entries in the books, reports, and statements of the First Security Bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005 (1982). 1
Bruce v. Deanpublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 149 Va. 39; 140 S.E. 277; 1927 Va. LEXIS 173
Chichester, J., delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit instituted on August 4,1925, by William F. Dean, Jr., administrator of Raymond S. Dean, deceased, against L. H. Bruce, committee of L. Gruver Meadows, for the purpose of having declared voluntary, “fraudulent and void, so far as the complainant’s demands are concerned,” a certain deed of trust, bearing date July 18, 1925, from L. Gruver Me
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1932-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 158 Va. 129; 163 S.E. 535; 82 A.L.R. 894; 1932 Va. LEXIS 247
Epes, J., dissenting. Kian, who is seeking to recover for improvements in this proceeding, has, so far as the record shows, had only constructive notice of the defects in his title. Constructive notice as here used means such notice as is given under the registry statutes by the mere recordation of a deed, or by the existence of a public record, or by the recitals in a remote deed in the defendant’s chain of tit