Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Deavault v. United States”
Deavault v. United Statespublic domain
536 U.S. 978 DEAVAULTv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-9502. Supreme Court of the United States. August 5, 2002. 1 535 U. S. 1069. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Deavault v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Deavault v. United Statespublic domain
535 U.S. 1069 DEAVAULTv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-9502. Supreme Court of the United States. May 13, 2002. 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Deavault v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Donald Deavaultpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3992 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States
United States of America v. Donald Deavaultpublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Donald Deavault appeals his conviction for carjacking and use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2119(a) and 924(c)(1). Deavault argues there was insufficient evidence to convict, the district court 1 abused its discretion by denying his post-trial motion for
United States v. Reavespublic domain
649 F.3d 862 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Danny REAVES, Appellant. No. 10-3145. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 17, 2011. Filed: August 12, 2011. *863 A. Michael Bianchi, argued, Omaha, NE, for Appellant. Michael P. Norris, AUSA, argued, Omaha, NE, for Appel
Johnson v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT FEDERAL CAPITAL CONVICTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................682 A. Factual Background ............................
United States v. Eric Conroypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1390 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
United States v. Eric Conroypublic domain
*836 RILEY, Circuit Judge. Eric Conroy (Conroy) was convicted of aggravated sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241(a)(1), 2246(2)(A), and 1153, and abusive sexual conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2244(a)(1), 2246(3), and 1153. Conroy challenges his convictions, arguing the district court
United States v. Raymond Derrick Bakerpublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Raymond Derrick Baker was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and the district court 1 imposed a sentence of 105 months imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2000). Baker appeals the distri
United States v. Raymond D. Bakerpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2580 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District
United States v. Nathan Dogskin, Jr.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-3779 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distr
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Nathan Benedict Dogskin, Jr. was convicted of aggravated sexual abuse and aiding and abetting aggravated sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1153, and 2241(a)(1). Dogskin appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and alleged gove
Swoyer v. Kercherpublic domain
*976534 U. S. 831; 534 U. S. 831; 534 U. S. 832; 535 U. S. 904; 534 U. S. 832; 534 U. S. 849; 534 U. S. 857; ante, p. 904; 535 U. S. 685; ante, p. 904; 535 U. S. 1055; 535 U. S. 1056;
Swoyer v. Kercherpublic domain
*976534 U. S. 831; 534 U. S. 831; 534 U. S. 832; 535 U. S. 904; 534 U. S. 832; 534 U. S. 849; 534 U. S. 857; ante, p. 904; 535 U. S. 685; ante, p. 904; 535 U. S. 1055; 535 U. S. 1056;
People of the Virgin Islands v. Jose Riverapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) CASE NO. SX-2012-CR-065 ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSE RIVERA, ) ) Defendant. ) Cite as: 2020 VI Super 64 Appearances: JOSEPH PONTEEN, ESQ. Chief Deputy Attorney General Virgin Islands Department of Justice Christiansted, VI 00820 For People of the Virgin Islands GORDON C. RHEA, ESQ. Gordon C. Rhea, P.C. St. Thomas, VI 00803 For Jose Rivera MICHAEL C, JOSEPH, ESQ. Kingshill VI, 0085