Cases

Opinion by JUDGE ASHBY {1 Plaintiffs, Deborah Mackall and Herbert Hutchins, appeal the district court's judgment dismissing their complaint pursuant to C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5). As an issue of first impression in Colorado, we first address whether a debtor who fails to disclose a state court claim to the bankruptcy court lacks standing to assert that claim after the bank-ruptey case is dismissed. Because we conclude

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a group of African American employees and former employees (plaintiffs), appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal of their race discrimination ease against their employer, AG. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (defendant), with prejudice and from the denial of their motion for class cert

116 F.3d 1256 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,820, 38 Fed.R.Serv.3d 37 Tony HUTCHINS, Virgil Houston, Eric Wynn, Gary Prince,Janice Davis, John Haliburton, Laverne Laws, Renee Petty,Jenay Parker, Cynthia Wilson, Wylda Carey, Darlene Y.Williams, Joseph Hicks, Felicia Clay, Sheila Harris,Marietta Sumrall, Deborah Moore, Vanessa Sutton, GinaTerrell, Sherrie Robinson, Appellants,v.A.G. EDWARDS & SON

McCullough, judge. We consider a number of issues in these consolidated appeals. 1 Deborah MacDougall challenges the trial court’s rulings with regard to whether she contracted a valid marriage with Richard S. Levick and the enforceability of the parties’ marital agreement. Levick challenges the court’s refusal to compel re

PER CURIAM. This judicial discipline case involves several complaints of misconduct which allegedly occurred while respondent served as a magistrate judge. He is currently retired. After a full investigation by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and a hearing before the Commission on Judicial Conduct Panel (Panel), the Panel recommended the following sanctions: (1) public reprimand; (2) respondent be prohibited from seekin

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any May 26 2017, 6:01 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, McCullough and O’Brien Argued by teleconference DEBORAH MacDOUGALL v. Record No. 1981-14-4 RICHARD S. LEVICK OPINION BY JUDGE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH RICHARD S. LEVICK

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-BG-762 12/7/2017 IN RE DORRANCE DICKENS, RESPONDENT,

18 A.3d 955 (2011) 198 Md. App. 610 Justin GIMBLE v. STATE of Maryland. No. 133, September Term, 2010. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 29, 2011. *957 Renee M. Hutchins (University of MD School of Law, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for appellant. Todd W. Hesel (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. G

Opinion by Judge MARQUEZ.* Petitioner, Maria Caldwell, appeals the probate court's order giving testamentary effect to words crossed out on decedent's holographic will. We affirm. I. Background On December 1, 2004, David Schumacher (decedent) executed a holographic will, which contained a clause devising shares of Meyers Land & Catt

437 F.Supp.2d 1332 (2006) MERIAL LIMITED and Merial SAS, Plaintiffs, v. INTERVET, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A.1:05-CV3168CAP. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. July 10, 2006. *1333 Deborah L. Lu, Edgar H. Haug, Sandra Kuzmich, Thomas J. Kowalski, Frommer, Lawrence & Haug, New York City, J. Patrick E

770 So.2d 49 (2000) Lorene HUTCHINS, as administratrix of the estate of Marvin Hutchins, deceased v. DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al. DCH Healthcare Authority, Inc., d/b/a DCH Regional Medical Center v. Lorene Hutchins, as administratrix of the estate of Marvin Hutchins, deceased. 1972266 and 1972298. Supreme Court of Alabama. February 11, 2000. R

284 F.Supp.2d 278 (2003) Deborah L. SHEAHY v. PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al. No. CIV. JFM-03-544. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 12, 2003. Russell J. Pope, Pope and Hughes, PA, Towson, MD, for Deborah L. Sheahy. P. Rivka Schochet, Thomas G. Parachini, Steven C. Kahn, Miller, Canfield, Paddock

Duggan, J., The plaintiffs, who represent the estate and children of the decedent Raymond Baker, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Coffey, J.) granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss their wrongful death claim because of immunities provided by RSA 215-A:34, II (2000) and RSA 508:14,1 (1997). We affirm. The plaintiffs’ writ of summons alleged the following facts. On July 11, 1998, Baker and Al

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Justice PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of the defendant employer in a sexual harassment case. We review the Appellate Division’s determination affirming the trial court’s decision to bar the testimony of a fact witness. Plaintiffs Tonique Griffin (Griffin), Virginia Best (Be

School boards enjoy the right of governmental immunity absent waiver or a statute to the contrary.1 In this case, Plaintiff Robert Ernest Willett argues that a school board's participation in the North Carolina School Board Trust Fund and performance of a proprietary function constituted waivers; he also asserts the existence of a statutory cause of action. Because his arguments are not supported by North Carolina law, we reject Plain

McDonald, J. It has been said that "mercy without justice is the mother of dissolution; justice without mercy is cruelty." 1 A sentence of life in prison without parole may be just for certain adult offenders, but the Eighth Amendment's proscription against cruel and unusual punishments precludes that senten

327 S.C. 242 (1997) 489 S.E.2d 472 HAYNE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellant, v. Lynda Hutchins BAILEY, a/k/a Lynda Hutchins Smith, Harold E. Bailey, Karen Kristen Bailey, National Welders Supply Company, Inc., United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents. No. 24678. Supreme Court of South Carolina.

74 F.3d 1248 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ra