Cases

140 T.C. No. 3 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DEBORAH L. SMITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12605-08. Filed February 28, 2013. In 2007 P and her daughters moved from San Francisco to Canada and became permanent residents of Canada. P continued to own a home and maintained a post office box in San Francisco. In December 2007 P returned to San Francisco to mo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 6, 2005 Session JOHN L. SMITH v. DEBORAH SMITH Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cheatham County No. 11083 Leonard W. Martin, Judge No. M2003-02259-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 23, 2006 This appeal arises from a custody dispute involving an eleven-year-old boy. After

OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Deborah Johnson, Warden of the Central California Women’s Facility, appeals the district court’s grapt of Petitioner-Appellee Maria Alfaro’s petition for habeas corpus relief. We hold that Alfaro’s claim is barred by her failure to exhaust available state court remedies, and is untimely under Federal Rule of Civil Proc

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CANDACE L. FOX, No. 13-56704 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-06933-AG-SS DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

DEBORAH L. SMITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentSmith v. Comm'rDocket No. 12605-08United States Tax Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Deborah L. Masten of starting a fire that heavily damaged her failing tavern, Too Tails Two Eatery and Spirits (“Too Tails”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). We affirmed the conviction, rejecting Masten’s claim of insufficient evidence. “While the evidence showed that Masten left the bar shortly after the last two employees,” we expla

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. In this proceeding we consider eleven 1 consolidated appeals arising out of cases decided under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. Ten different substantive issues are presented, in varying combinations, in these cases.

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. After a lengthy investigation of fire insurance claims presented by the plaintiffs, the defendant insurance company rejected the claims. The district court, which had jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, entered summary judgment in favor of the company. The court held that the plaintiffs’ claims were barred by provisions in the insurance policies that required suit to be brought wit

OPINION Sharon G. Lee, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., Cornelia A. Clark, Holly Kirby, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26~121(a)(2)(E)requires a person who asserts a potential claim for healthcare liability to include with pre-s

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00182-COA LEATRICE SMITH AND DEBORAH SMITH APPELLANTS v. LARUE BAKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS APPELLEES PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY, LARUE DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC., JUSTIN ESTESS, M.D., AND BROOKHAVEN ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, P.A. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/05/2020 TRIAL JUDGE:

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 99-2-03423-1, James M. Murphy, J., entered March 12, 2001. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Sweeney, J.

PRISCILLA OWEN, Circuit Judge: *551 16 Front Street, LLC and Richard Cotton (collectively, Front Street) filed a citizen suit under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7604

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00367-COA BRIAN S. POPE APPELLANT v. DEBORAH BAIRD MARTIN A/K/A DEBORAH APPELLEE L. MARTIN A/K/A DEBORAH MARTIN POPE A/K/A DEBORAH L. POPE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/23/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. The question presented by this appeal is whether the Oklahoma Statute of Frauds, Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 136, precludes enforcement of an in-court oral settlement agreement involving the transfer of real property, the terms of the settlement agreement having been agreed to at a settlement conference before a magistrate judge. Plaintiff Thomas P. Gibson

561 F.Supp.2d 74 (2008) FRIENDSHIP EDISON PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL CHAMBERLAIN CAMPUS, Plaintiff, v. Ebony SMITH, as next friend of the minor child, L.S., et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-2461 DAR. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 25, 2008. *75 Paul S. Dalton, Dalton, Dalton & Houston, P.C., Alexa

OPINION Opinion by Justice Garza This case involves personal injuries allegedly caused by a contract working dog (“CWD”) on a United States military base in Afghanistan. Appellant LaTasha Freeman argues that the trial court erred in granting a plea to the jurisdiction dismissing her suit against appellees, American K-9 Detection Serv

707 S.E.2d 175 (2011) SMITH v. The STATE. No. A11A0099. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 8, 2011. *176 Silver & Archiborah, Deborah L. Gowen, Athens, for appellant. Kenneth W. Mauldin, District Attorney, Brian V. Patterson, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. McFADDEN, Judge. After a jury trial,

NEBEKER, Senior Judge: On March 22, 2010, a jury found appellant Aton L. Smith guilty of obstructing justice1 and two counts of introducing contraband into a penal institution,2 and appellant Tela N. Thompson guilty of introducing contraband into a penal institution, three counts of perjury,3 and obstructing justice.4

OPINION BROWN, Judge. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (“JPMor-gan”) appeals the trial court’s order of January 16, 2014, denying its December 19, 2013 “Combined Motion to Intervene, to Stay January 9, 2014 Sheriff Sale, to Vacate Order of Sale, to Vacate the May 27, 2010 Summary Judgment and Decree of Foreclosure, and Request for Expedited Hearing on Motion.” Ap

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 29A02-1402-MF-65. - RUSH, Chief Justice. • Three years after a final judgment foreclosing Plaintiffs judgment lien—and six years after the suit began—a successor mortgagee moved to intervene to assert its interest in the ‘foreclosed property. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discreti