⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Deborah L. Taylor”

Taylor v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014-09-04 · Published · cited 0× · 48 F. Supp. 3d 872; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124331; 2014 WL 4385796
MEMORANDUM OPINION GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge. Plaintiff has filed this action challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiffs claim for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423. Jurisdiction of this court is pursuant to § 205(g) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As reflec
Taylor v. Jamespublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 2910; 192 L. Ed. 2d 940; 83 U.S.L.W. 3929; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4442
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015-02-02 · Published · cited 2× · 221 Md. App. 355; 109 A.3d 142; 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 18; 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 246
*358 EYLER, DEBORAH S., J. Giant of Maryland, LLC (“Giant”), and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”), the appellants, challenge a judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County entered on a supersedeas bond (“the Bond”) in
Taylor v. Cottrellpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014-02-03 · Published · cited 2× · 995 F. Supp. 2d 1052; 2014 WL 409111; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13240
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HENRY EDWARD AUTREY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant Cottrell, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on LMRA Preemption Grounds, [Doc. No. 140]. The motion is fully briefed. Factual Background At the time of his injury, Plaintiff was a Teamster car hauler for Jack Cooper Transport sin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-07-29 · Published · cited 13× · 795 F.3d 813; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13173; 2015 WL 4546937
BYE, Circuit Judge. Timmy A. Taylor (“Taylor”) and Deborah Taylor brought this action to recover damages resulting from injuries Taylor sustained in two incidents involving a Cott-rell, Inc. (“Cottrell”) truck trailer. Upon Cottrell’s motion in limine, the district court excluded one of Taylor’s expert witnesses, finding the doctor had entered into an impermissible contingent-fee
Taylor v. Watkinspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-10-14 · Published · cited 71× · 623 F.3d 483; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21198; 2010 WL 4008723
623 F.3d 483 (2010) Corey A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James B. WATKINS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-2353. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted August 11, 2010. Decided October 14, 2010. *484 Corey A. Taylor (submitted), Tamms Correctional Center, Tamms, IL, pro se. Deb
Texas Supreme Court · 2017-06-23 · Published · cited 83× · 521 S.W.3d 791; 60 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1433; 2017 WL 2719330; 2017 Tex. LEXIS 601
Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Hecht, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Guzman joined. In this case we construe a deed that conveyed a mineral estate and the surface above it. Doing so allows us to reinforce a trend in our mineral-deed jurisprudence. Over the past several decades, we have incrementally cast off rigid
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-04-19 · Published · cited 137× · 819 F.3d 758; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 538; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7090; 2016 WL 1567616
COSTA, Circuit Judge: This asbestos case requires us to once again wade into the thicket of improper joinder law. 13F Charles Alan Wright et al„ Federal Practice and Procedure § 3641.1 (3d ed.2009) (noting that the Fifth Circuit “embraces a number of district courts that in particular have seen a considerable amount of removal activity that has raised issues of fraudulent joinde
Taylor v. Headpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1991-08-23 · Published · cited 0× · 1991 Md. LEXIS 138; 323 Md. 546; 594 A.2d 115
KARWACKI, Judge. In this case we are concerned with whether a North Carolina trial court was vested with personal jurisdiction over Linwood M. Head, a Maryland resident, when it entered an order on October 14,1987, requiring him to contribute to the support of his minor child, who resided in North Carolina with his mother, Deborah L. Taylor, and, if so, whether its exercise of personal jurisdiction under the circumstances of t
Taylor v. Glennpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2010 OK CIV APP 20; 231 P.3d 765; 2010 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 2; 2010 WL 725416
231 P.3d 765 (2010) 2010 OK CIV APP 20 Jonathon TAYLOR, Individually, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Deborah L. GLENN, Individually, and Debbie Glenn Enterprises, L.L.C., an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, Defendants/Appellees, and Everett Chambers, II, Individually; Everett Chambers, I, Individually; and Brenda Chambers, Defendants. No. 106,654. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civi
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 138 A.3d 1171; 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 158; 2016 WL 2772199
NEREKER, Senior Judge: Appellant Christian D. Taylor appeals his convictions arising from the armed robbery of Lida Wholesale Market, during, which the market’s owners, Li Jen Chih and Ming Kun Chih, were killed. Appellant was convicted of two counts of first-degree premeditated murder, four counts of felony murder, burglary two while armed, robbery while armed, and seven coun
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 211 So. 3d 258; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 490
Per Curiam. Affirmed. See O.I.C.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 169 So.3d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), rev. dismissed, No. SC15-1570, 205 So.3d 575 (Fla. Sept. 22, 2016). Taylor and Klingensmith, JJ., concur. Forst, J,, dissents with opinion.
Taylor v. Woodspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 11× · 282 S.W.3d 285; 102 Ark. App. 92; 2008 Ark. App. LEXIS 286
282 S.W.3d 285 (2008) Carra TAYLOR, Appellant, v. James Eugene WOODS, et al., Appellees. No. CA 07-203. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. April 9, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 20, 2008. *287 Rieves, Rubens & Mayton, by: Kent J. Rubens, West Memphis, AR; and Lax, Vaughan, Fortson, McKenzie & Rowe, P.A. by: Gr
In re Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 196 N.J. 162; 952 A.2d 1025; 2008 N.J. LEXIS 891
Justice WALLACE, JR., delivered the opinion of the court. The Cape May County Prosecutor (Prosecutor) petitioned the Assignment Judge pursuant to N.J.S.A 2A:158-7 to direct the Cape May County Board of Chosen Freeholders (County) to appropriate additional necessary funds for the Prosecutor’s Office beyond the amount initially approved by the County. Most of the funds sought were for salary increases
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005-01-26 · Published · cited 9× · 153 S.W.3d 878; 26 A.L.R. 6th 751; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 140; 2005 WL 157356
153 S.W.3d 878 (2005) Deborah D. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent. No. 26424. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. January 26, 2005. *879 Deborah D. Taylor, pro se. Alan J. Downs, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge. Claimant-Appe
Taylor v. Barnhartpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003-11-21 · Published · cited 70× · 83 F. App'x 347
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Deborah Taylor filed a claim for Social Security disability insurance benefits in 1996. After receiving notice that her claim had been denied, plaintiff requested a hearing, and appeared with counsel before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ denied her claim, finding that she was not disabled because she retained the residual functional capacity to perform a full range of activities
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014-09-05 · Published · cited 3× · 48 F. Supp. 3d 894; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123988; 2014 WL 4403447
ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. This litigation involves a landfill and waste disposal contract between Plaintiff Waste Management of Louisiana, L.L.C. (‘Waste Management”) and Defendant Jefferson Parish. Before the Court is Jefferson Parish’s “Motion to Dismiss,”1 wherein Jefferson Parish requests that the Court dismiss this case for
Taylor v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2004-10-13 · Published · cited 37× · 146 S.W.3d 801; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 9056; 2004 WL 2290241
146 S.W.3d 801 (2004) Billy Bandrate TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-03-00166-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted September 29, 2004. Decided October 13, 2004. *803 Craig L. Henry, M. Mark Lesher, Texarkana, for appellant. Deborah Moore, Red River Asst. County Att
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-06 · Published · cited 0× · 249 F. Supp. 3d 1248; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52909
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE • Before the court, is the Motion for Remand to State Court filed by defendants Patrick L- Taylor and Marshaleta Taylor (“the Taylors”) [Doc.. # 18]. In 2007, plaintiff Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma (also known as Jenks Public Schools, hereinafter “JPS”) brought an action in state district court to condemn