Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Debra Ann Roberson”
Roberson v. Perezpublic domain
¶1 After acquittal on six counts of rape and molestation of a child, Honnah Sims and her husband (Petitioners) successfully sued Douglas County (County) for negligent investigation of child abuse allegations. Petitioners now appeal a Court of Appeals decision reversing their jury award and dismissing their action. J.M. Johnson, J. ¶2 The primary issues for our consideration are (1) the applicability of the law
Aaron Chevalier v. W.M. Robersonpublic domain
FILED IN 1STCOURT OFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS Case No. 01-15-00225-CV NOV IB 2015 IN THE CHRISTOPHER A^RINE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT HOUSTON, TEXAS Aaron Chevalier, Appellant-Tenant
Roberson v. Perezpublic domain
123 P.3d 844 (2005) 156 Wash.2d 33 Robert ROBERSON and Connie Roberson, husband and wife; Robert Roberson as Guardian ad Litem for his minor child, Rebekah Roberson; Donna Rodriguez, a single person; Donna Rodriguez as Guardian ad Litem for her minor child, Kimberly Allbee, Plaintiffs, Jonathan Sims and Honnah Sims, husband and wife, and Jonathan Sims as Guardian ad Litem for his minor child, Daniel Sims, Petitioners, v.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 15, 2002 Session LAFEYETTE ROMINE, SR., & DEBRA P. ROMINE v. JULIA FERNANDEZ, CRNA & JOHNATHAN ISOM, M.D. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 305315-9 T.D. Robert L. Childers , Judge No. W2002-00703-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 15, 2003
Rhodes v. Tractor & Equipment Co.public domain
677 So.2d 194 (1995) Charles Ray RHODES and Debra Ann Rhodes v. TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Oscar ROBERSON, Jr., and Audrey Roberson v. TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT COMPANY. 1940223, 1940224. Supreme Court of Alabama. November 22, 1995. Rehearing Denied April 12, 1996. *195 Jeffrey C. Kirby of Pittman
ACCEPTED 02-15-00111-cv SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 12/14/2015 4:
2005 Acura TSX v. Statepublic domain
OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Durwin Overall appeals the trial court’s judgment forfeiting a 2005 Acura TSX to the State of Texas. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTUAL SUMMARY The State’s notice of seizure and intended forfeiture alleged that the 2005 Acura TSX was seized
Jarod Marges Phillips v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
04/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 9, 2020 JAROD MARGES PHILLIPS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2009-D-3454 Jennifer Smith, Judge ___________________________________
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00299-CV XTO ENERGY INC., TOMMY J. APPELLANTS MADEWELL, PATRICIA MADEWELL, VIOLET JOYCE RENFRO KIVIMAKI, GARY W. YOUNT, SHIRLEY K. STEPHENS, GREGORY DOYLE MOSELEY, SHARLET YVONNE HOLAMON, VIOLA D‘ANN MADEWELL, NASA ENERGY CORPORATION, EDITH MADEWELL MCCURRIN, TOMMY ROESSLER, DEBBIE MADEWELL, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF ARTHUR FRED MADEWE
Tribune Co. v. Comm'rpublic domain
TRIBUNE COMPANY, AS AGENT OF AND SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO THE FORMER THE TIMES MIRROR COMPANY, ITSELF AND ITS CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentTribune Co. v. Comm'rNo. 17443-02 United States Tax
Bell v. Statepublic domain
169 S.W.3d 384 (2005) Danny Lee BELL, Sr. a/k/a Danny Lee Bell, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-03-214-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. July 7, 2005. *388 Law Offices of Moore & Cummings, Larry M. Moore, Fort Worth, for appellant. Tim Curry, Criminal District Attorney, Charles M. Mallin, Debra
Margaret Colleen Foston v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed August 7, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00239-CR __________ MARGARET COLLEEN FOSTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 142nd District Court Midland Coun
Joshua Howell v. State of Indianapublic domain
VAIDIK, Chief Judge. Case Summary , [1] At the time of the crime in this case, burglary was generally a Class C felony but was a Cl^ss B felony if the building or structure was a ■ “dwelling,” The State charged Joshua Howell with Class B felony burglary for breaking into a house just hours after the sole occupant was found dead inside. We find that it is
Anthony Darell Turner v. Statepublic domain
02-11-070&071-CR
Anthony Darell Turner v. Statepublic domain
02-11-070&071-CR
Anthony Darell Turner v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00070-CR Anthony Darell Turner § From the 372nd District Court § of Tarrant County (1162246D) v. § February 14, 2013 § Opinion by Justice Gabriel T
Anthony Darell Turner v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00071-CR Anthony Darell Turner § From the 372nd District Court § of Tarrant County (1190902D) v. § February 14, 2013 § Opinion by Justice Gabriel T
OlXY NEAL, Judge. Appellant Debra Carpenter appeals a decision of the Arkansas Board of Review which affirmed a decision of the Appeal Tribunal and an earlier determination by the Arkansas Employment Security Department that appellant should be disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-513 (a) (1987). We believe that the Board of Review’s decision was not supported by subs
Montreal Brown v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00648-COA MONTREAL BROWN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/12/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEBRA W. BLACKWELL COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ADAMS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR
Romine v. Fernandezpublic domain
DAVID R. FARMER, J., concurring and dissenting. I concur with the majority opinion that the pleading filed by the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action is not required to demand a specific sum. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-26-117. I respectfully dissent from the holding that the claims against Dr. Isom and Ms. Fernandez were not barred by the one year statute of limitat