Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Decker v. Credit Auto Sales”
Gevedon v. Deckerpublic domain
[Cite as Gevedon v. Decker, 2021-Ohio-77.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY : KENNETH GEVEDON : : Appellate Case No. 2020-CA-21 Plaintiff-Appellant :
Decker v. Tramielpublic domain
OPINION HUG, Circuit Judge: This ease involves a bankruptcy appeal. Appellant Jack Tramiel, a member of the JTS Corporation board of directors, attempted to assist the debtor, JTS Corporation (“JTS”), and purchased real property from JTS. It was held that this purchase was a constructive fraudulent conveyance and that Tramiel was liable for the value of the property. The major issues in this case are w
Decker v. Deckerpublic domain
435 S.E.2d 407 (1993) John G. DECKER v. Joy Frances McFadin DECKER. Record No. 1524-92-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia. September 7, 1993. *409 James F. Stutts, Gregg A. Scoggins, Richmond, James H. Ford, Martinsville (McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, on briefs), for appellant. Harry F. Bosen, Jr., Charles B.
Decker v. Tramiel (In Re JTS Corp.)public domain
617 F.3d 1102 (2010) In the Matter of JTS CORPORATION, Debtor, Suzanne L. Decker, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Tramiel, Defendant-Appellant, and Roger W. Johnson; Jean D. Deleage; Amber Arbitrage LDC, a private investment fund incorporated in the Cayman Islands, Defendants, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Trustee, v. Lip-Bu Tan, Third-party-defendant. In the Matter of JTS Corporation, Debtor, Suzanne L. Decker, Plaintiff-Ap
WEBSTER, Circuit Judge. In this diversity case, Decker-Ruhl Ford Sales, Inc. áppeals from a final judgment entered against it on December 18, 1974. It contends that the District Court erred in (1) dismissing two counts of its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and (2) directing a verdict for defendant Ford Motor Credit Company on a third cou
Laurel Yamaha, Inc. v. Norman Decker Freemanpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2005-IA-01605-SCT LAUREL YAMAHA, INC. v. NORMAN DECKER FREEMAN AND SUSAN FREEMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF CHRISTOPHER BRANDON FREEMAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/15/2005 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: LAU
Colton v. Deckerpublic domain
540 N.W.2d 172 (1995) John COLTON and Pamela Colton, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Lee DECKER and Betty Decker, Defendants and Appellants. Nos. 18709, 18710. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued March 21, 1995. Decided November 15, 1995. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1995. *174 Thomas J. Johnson,
Dan Porter Motors, Inc. v. Decker (In Re Decker)public domain
153 B.R. 997 (1993) In re Kenneth P. DECKER, Debtor. DAN PORTER MOTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Kenneth P. DECKER, a/k/a Ken Decker, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 92-30933, Adv. No. 92-7093. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota. April 27, 1993. *998 Michael Maus, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff. David Senn, Dickinson,
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This antitrust case requires us to apply the standards announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct.
In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.public domain
801 F.Supp.2d 993 (2011) In re HYDROXYCUT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. Andrew Dremak, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated and the general public, Plaintiff, v. Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 09md2087 BTM (CAB). S.D. Cal. No. 09cv1088. United States District Court, S.D. California. May 31, 2011.
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part in the judgment and dissenting in part: I concur with the majority in that I too would reverse the district court’s dismissal of the tortious interference claim. However, because I have significant concerns with the analysis of that claim, I join in that portion of the opinion only as to the
105 B.R. 79 (1989) In re Raymond DECKER and Helen Decker, Debtors. BARNETT BANK OF PASCO COUNTY, Plaintiff, v. Raymond DECKER and Helen Decker, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-1570-8P7, Adv. No. 88-431. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 25, 1989. *80 Larry Foyle, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. <
United States v. David John Deckerpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Defendant, David Decker, was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture MDA, 1 a controlled substance. One item of evidence introduced against defendant during trial was found in an inventory search of his vehicle. Defendant argues that this search was illegal and that this item of evidence accordingly should have been
903 P.2d 1150 (1995) Thomas H. DECKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF COLORADO, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93CA1427. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. January 12, 1995. Rehearing Denied March 16, 1995. Certiorari Granted October 2, 1995. Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied October 2, 1995.</
In re Deckerpublic domain
OPINION RODNEY BERNARD, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. Hearing was held on January 8th on an opposition of Chrysler Credit Corporation to the trustee’s Objection to the Claim. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS James Decker, the debtor herein, purchased a 1977 Dodge Aspen in Birmingham, Alabama on about August 12,1978. At the time of the purchase Mr. Decker told the salesperson that he
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Record No. 0846-25-2 PRECISION & PERFORMANCE AUTO CARE, LLC, ET AL. v. JAMES RIVER PETROLEUM, INC. Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Ortiz and Callins Argued at Richmond, Virginia Opinion Issued May 12, 2026 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF H
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
754 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNITENDED ACCELERATION MAKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. This document relates to: All economic loss cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 30, 2010. *1151 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton B. Fisher, Jayne
Nemir v. Mitsubishi Motors Sales Corp. of Americapublic domain
60 F.Supp.2d 660 (1999) Michael A. NEMIR, Plaintiff, v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF AMERICA and Chrysler Corp., Defendants. No. 96-75380. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 30, 1999. *661 *662 George A. Hilborn, Eric A. Buikema, Hilborn & Hilborn, PC, Birmin
Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. Capertonpublic domain
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: In the late summer of 1989, Rum Creek Coal Sales (the “Company”) became involved in a coal strike. The appeal before us does not focus on the conduct of strikers or the coal company; rather, we are asked to examine the actions of the West Virginia Police (“Police”).1 As the coal strike progressed, the Company became convinced that the Police were failing to protect it be
Rum Creek Coal Sales, Incorporated v. Capertonpublic domain
926 F.2d 353 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2649, 59 USLW 2551,118 Lab.Cas. P 10,628 RUM CREEK COAL SALES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Honorable W. Gaston CAPERTON; Colonel J.R. Buckalew;Captain A.W. (Gene) Bumgardner; Sergeant Glen A. Ables;Sergeant David L. Belcher; Sergeant B.R. Chafin; SergeantP.D. Clemons; Corporal W.E. McGraw, II; Trooper C.E.Akers; Trooper K.W. Cordial; Trooper W.