Cases

896 A.2d 1036 (2006) 392 Md. 301 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF OAKLAND v. MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF MOUNTAIN LAKE PARK, et al. No. 60, Sept. Term, 2005. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 18, 2006. *1038 David M. Funk (Jefferson L. Blomquist, Amanda Stakem Conn, Ernest A. Crofoot, Funk & Bolton, P.A., Bal

BIRD, C. J., Concurring and Dissenting. The power of eminent domain claimed by the City in this case is not only novel but virtually without limit. This is troubling because the potential for abuse of such a great power is boundless. Although I am forced by the current state of the law to agree with the result reached by the majority, I have not signed their opinion because it endorses this unprec

Appellate Case: 19-1330 Document: 010110642555 Date Filed: 02/08/2022 Page: 1 FILED PUBLISH United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 8, 2022

Filed 6/16/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- NEWTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY et al., C092069 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. PC20190037) v. COUNTY

926 F.Supp. 928 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant. No. C-95-1100 WHO. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 16, 1995. *929 Michael Yamaguchi, United States Attorney, Jay R. Weill, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

150 Cal.App.3d 267 (1983) 197 Cal. Rptr. 729 CITY OF OAKLAND, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MONTEREY COUNTY, Respondent; OAKLAND RAIDERS et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. AO23607. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. December 29, 1983. *270 COUNSEL David A

OPINION KESSLER, Presiding Judge: ¶ 1 In 2012, White Mountain Health Center, Inc. (“White Mountain”) sought county zoning approval to establish a medical marijuana dispensary (“MMD”) pursuant to the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) sections 36-2801 to -2819 (2014 and Supp. 2015).2 Maricopa County refused to issue the necessary zoning d

735 F.Supp.2d 957 (2010) Vivian J. RENTA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF COOK, Russell Tomar, M.D., individually, and Marin Sekosan, M.D., individually, Defendants. Case No. 05 C 2995. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 19, 2010. *962 Robert D. Sweeney, Adam Seth Miller, Timothy Patrick Kerrigan

610 F.Supp.2d 1129 (2009) David F. JADWIN, D.O., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF KERN; Peter Bryan (Both individually and in his former capacity as Chief Executive Of Kern Medical Center); Irwin Harris, M.D.; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-00026-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. April 8, 2009. *1

Opinion REARDON, J. The question in this workers’ compensation matter is whether salary continuation benefits paid to an injured public safety officer count toward a 104-week limit on payments for an injury causing temporary disability. We conclude the answer is “yes.” BACKGROUND On September 13, 2009, Bryan Knittel injured his knee while working as an Alameda County Deput

Filed 6/29/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Tehama) DAVID GARST, as Trustee, etc., C103356 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23CI000079) v. TEHAMA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Def

The complaint in this case was filed in December, 1904, and was brought to issue by answer in October, 1905. On appeal from the judgment at the first trial it was held that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict in favor of plaintiff but the judgment was reversed because of an instruction which, in the opinion of the appellate court, took from the jury a question of fact. Ryan v. Oakland Gas etc. Co., 10 Cal.App. 484, [

271 Cal.App.2d 555 (1969) CITY OF OAKLAND, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, MARYON BERNARDINI et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 25873. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. Apr. 8, 1969. Edward A. Goggin, City Attorney, and George M. Cahalan, Assistant City Attorney, for Petitioner. Everett A. Corton, Richard E. Ryan, Caroll

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of defendant's negligence in allowing the walls *Page 486 of a trench in which plaintiff was working to fall upon him. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, on which judgment was duly entered. The court denied the motion of the defendant for a new trial, and this appeal is from the judgment and order denying said motion.<

Affirming. The National Bank of Kentucky, hereinafter called the bank, was a national bank engaged in the banking business in Louisville, Ky., and the Louisville Trust Company, hereinafter called the trust company, was a corporation, organized under the laws of Kentucky and doing a general trust business in that city. Some of the stockholders of these organizations conceived that it would be to their mutual interests to effect a close co-operation between the two institutions by poolin

37 Cal.App.4th 141 (1995) 43 Cal. Rptr. 366 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KENNETH F. IZANT et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. H012101. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. July 27, 1995. *143 COUNSEL Bertram C. Izant, in pro. per. and for

220 Cal.App.3d 765 (1990) 269 Cal. Rptr. 796 MIDWAY ORCHARDS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE et al., Defendants and Appellants; CITY OF CHICO, Intervener and Respondent. COUNTY OF BUTTE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MIDWAY ORCHARDS et al., Defendants and Appellants; CITY OF CHICO, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Docket Nos. C004316, C003276. Court of A

222 Cal.App.3d 1133 (1990) 272 Cal. Rptr. 297 COUNTY OF SONOMA, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents. Docket No. A047126. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three. August 14, 1990. *1135 COUNSEL Mullen & Fili

74 Cal.App.2d 818 (1946) VETERANS' WELFARE BOARD (a Public Corporation) et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF OAKLAND et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 13027. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. June 7, 1946. Thos. J. Riordan, Warren H. Atherton and Chellis Carpenter for Appellants. Ralph E. Hoyt, District Attorney (Alameda), J. E. Coakley, Chief As

Robert L. Brown, Justice. This appeal concerns the notice procedures a lender must follow under the Uniform Commercial Code in order to claim a deficiency judgment against the debtor following the sale of collateral. The facts in this case are not disputed. On May 24, 1985, appellants Edward Walker and his wife, Ortha Walker, signed a promissory note in favor o