Cases

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *685Before the Court are Defendant Feuer's Motion to Dismiss, (Feuer Mot., Dkt. 50), Defendant Cuomo's Motion to Dismiss, (Cuomo Mot., Dkt. 55), Defendants Grewal and Denn's Motion to Dismiss, (Grewal & Denn Mot., Dkt. 57), Defendants Wolf and Shapiro's Motion to Dismiss, (Wolf & Shapiro Mot.,

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Gurbir Grewal, in his official capacity as New Jersey Attorney General. (Mot., Dkt. 52). Plaintiffs request that the Court enjoin enforcement of Section 3(l)(2) of New Jersey Senate Bill 2465, which provides for third degree criminal penalties for distributing dig

Case: 21-50327 Document: 00516263671 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 1, 2022

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ Nos. 19-1729 & 19-3182 ______________ DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; FIREARMS POLICY FOUNDATION; CALGUNS FOUNDATION; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES INC; BRANDON COMBS, Appellants

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 3, 2019 Decided April 7, 2020 No. 18-1172 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, PETITIONER v. ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ARKEMA INC. AND MEXICHEM FLUOR, INC.,

18-2121-ag (L) Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and State of Vermont v. United States Environmental Protection Agency UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: November 20, 2019 Decided: June 5, 2020 Docket Nos. 18-2121-ag; 18-2670

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Re: Docket No. 33) PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Tricia Ogden (“Ogden”) moves to compel Defendant Bumble Bee Foods, LLC (“Bumble Bee”) to provide more complete responses to her interrogatories, requests for admissions, and requests for production. Having considered the parties’ papers and arguments, the court GRANTS-IN-PART O

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Re: Docket Nos. 44, 58, 75) PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge The present motions in this civil rights suit raise two related issues: exactly who may challenge the conditions of a county jail and who exactly may be challenged? While standing and mootness disputes in cases such as this are hardly new, the question of whether a p

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL (Re: Docket Nos. 3212, 3213) PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge Day 1,449 in this case. *237Following remand by the district judge on two issues arising out of the undersigned’s January 29, 2014 sanctions order, Plaintiff Apple Inc., Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (Re: Docket No. 143) PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge Each weekday, 139,582 people ride the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s bus and light rail train system.1 Richard Rosa and Walter Silveira are system operators who allege that from August 17, 2009 onward VTA subjected them to a common an

SABATINO, P.J.A.D. *823*347Tried by a jury, defendant Siwan R. Brown was found guilty of various drug offenses. The State's case was largely based on the seizure of over one thousand bags of heroin and other drug paraphernalia from a residence that defend

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. Mark Jackson; State v. Jamie Monroe (A-18/19-19) (083286) (NOTE: The Court did not write a plenary opinion in this case. The Court affirms the judgment of the

*950ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge Product launches are all about creating excitement. Excitement for a product. Excitement for the product’s manufacturer. Excitement for the product’s anticipated customers. But not everyone is excited, especially a trademark owner that believes the l

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff James Wang (“Wang”) brings the instant putative class action on behalf of himself and purchasers of OCZ Technology Agility 2 and Vertex 2 solid state drives (“SSDs”) during the relevant class period, beginning sometime after January

FUENTES, P.J.A.D. *462*533Defendant Kevin Brown appeals from the order of the Criminal Part denying his petition seeking post-conviction relief (PCR). We affirm. On December 19, 2008, a Bergen County Grand Jury returned an indictment agai

2024 IL App (1st) 240422 No. 1-24-0422B Opinion filed May 1, 2024 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

JUSTICE FERNANDEZ-VINA delivered the opinion of the Court. *1112**421In this appeal, we consider whether a warrant application that did not include evidence as to why a specific apartment unit should be searched fell short of establishing probable cause

SABATINO, P.J.A.D. *15In State v. Witt, 223 N.J. 409, 415, 126 A.3d 850 (2015), the Supreme Court revised th

PER CURIAM **589In this case, the State presented strong evidence that defendant Dorian Pressley distributed cocaine. According to the testimony at trial, defendant sold two vials of cocaine directly to an undercover detective on April 30, 2013. At the end of the face-to-face exchange, defendant gave the detective his phone number for future us

JUSTICE ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. **424*566We must decide whether a court, in sentencing a defendant within the range authorized by a jury's verdict, may impose a mandatory-minimum period of parole ineligibility under N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6(b),