Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dell Lewis”
Statler v. Dell, Inc.public domain
775 F.Supp.2d 474 (2011) Richard STATLER, D.C., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. No. CV 10-3798. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 30, 2011. *478 Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, By: David S. Nalven, Esq., Cambridge, MA, Hage
Statler v. Dell, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge. This is an action commenced by Plaintiff Richard Statler (“Plaintiff’), against Dell, Inc. (“Dell”) alleging several causes of action arising out of the alleged malfunction of five Dell computers leased by Plaintiff in 2003. Plaintiff seeks to represent himself as well as a class of similarly situated individuals. In a Memorandum and
People v. Lewispublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Tricia M. Ferrell, J. The defendant is charged with eight violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and now moves for an order dismissing all the charges. The defendant alleges that the “vehicle” involved in this case is a motorized bicycle pursuant to 15 USC § 2085, and not a motor vehicle; the charged violations all regulate operation related to a motor vehicle so it’s the defendant’s
O'Dell v. Director, Department of Workforce Servicespublic domain
RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge. | T Jana O’Dell, d/b/a Professional Transcription, appeals the Arkansas Board of Review’s decision holding that O’Dell is responsible for paying unemployment taxes on the typists she hires because she failed to satisfy the three-prong test in Arkansas Code Annotated section 11-10-210(e). O’Dell contends that the Board’s findings are
Big Baboon Corp. v. Dell, Inc.public domain
723 F.Supp.2d 1224 (2010) BIG BABOON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. DELL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CV 09-01198 SVW (SSx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 2, 2010. *1225 Bruce R. Zisser, Christopher A. Mathews, Danielle L. Gilmore, Emily Jane Smith, Frederick A.
Matter of O'Dell v. O'Dellpublic domain
Matter of O'Dell v O'Dell (2025 NY Slip Op 00551) Matter of O'Dell v O'Dell 2025 NY Slip Op 00551 Decided on January 31, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
O'Dell v. Trans World Entertainment Corp.public domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED. Julie O’Dell appeals from the order, entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, /.), granting the motion by Trans World Entertainment Corporation (“Trans World”) for summary judgment and for dismissal of O’Dell’s complaint i
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on nine separate Motions to Dismiss filed by all *804Defendants. For the reasons that follow, the Motions are granted. BACKGROUND A. Factual This is a qui tarn action brought by Relator Bryan Sandager. Sandage
DELL'OCA v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.public domain
71 Cal.Rptr.3d 737 (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 531 Conrad J. DELL'OCA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A., Defendant and Appellant. Nos. A111267, A112153. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One. January 29, 2008. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing February 22, 2008. <
O'DELL v. Trans World Entertainment Corp.public domain
153 F.Supp.2d 378 (2001) Julie O'DELL, Plaintiff, v. TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 00 Civ. 5156(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 28, 2001. *379 *380 Anne C. Vladeck, Karen Cacace, Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P.C., New York, New York,
Phillip M. Adams & Associates, LLC v. Dell, Inc.public domain
621 F.Supp.2d 1173 (2009) PHILLIP M. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. DELL, INC., Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu Computer Systems Corp., MPC Computers, LLC, Sony Electronics Inc., Winbond Electronics Corp., ASUSTEK Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Quanta Computer, Inc, Quanta Computer USA, Inc., Quanta Manufacturing, Inc., Micro-Star International Corporation, Ltd., MSI Computer Corporation, Na
Lewis v. Wrennpublic domain
Appeal from Circuit Court, Tallahatchie County; Andrew C. Baker, Judge. Before ROY NOBLE LEE, P.J., and DAN M. LEE and SULLIVAN, JJ. AFFIRMED.
Bailey v. Dell Pub. Co., Inc.public domain
790 F.Supp. 101 (1992) Donald BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. DELL PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., Daring Books, Charles J. Patterson and G. Lee Tippin, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-1398. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. April 20, 1992. *102 James P. Hollihan, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Roslyn M. Litman, Thomas Matis, P
Lewis v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant contends the trial court erred when it modified his probation conditions by directing the probation officer to determine his ability to pay and the monthly payment amount required by his probation conditions. We reverse the trial court’s order modifying the condition of probation. A trial court may not delegate the responsibility for determining a defendant’s ability to pay and the amount of m
O'DELL v. Hercules Inc.public domain
687 F.Supp. 450 (1988) Steven O'DELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HERCULES INC., et al., Defendants, Ruby BRIDGES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HERCULES INC., et al., Defendants. No. LR-C-86-435. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, W.D. June 15, 1988. *451 R. David Lewis, Philip McMath, Little Rock, Ark., Gary Davis, Kn
O'Dell v. O'Dellpublic domain
This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Tenth Judicial Circuit, denying a former husband's petition to discontinue alimony. Appellant and appellee were divorced on May 5, 1972. Appellee was awarded $400.00 monthly alimony, to continue until such time as appellee remarried. On April 9, 1975 appellant filed this petition, requesting that the alimony be discontinued. The petition set forth as grounds for reduction an allegation that appellee had r
Lewis v. Statepublic domain
629 N.E.2d 934 (1994) David J. LEWIS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 28A04-9303-CR-87.[1] Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. March 2, 1994. *935 J.J. Paul, III, Frederick Vaiana, Symmes Voyles Zahn Paul & Hogan, Indianapolis, for appellant-defendant. Pamela Carter
Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Lewispublic domain
701 So.2d 893 (1997) AIRPORT RENT-A-CAR, INC. and Warren A. Campbell, Appellants, v. Jewel McNeal LEWIS, Appellee. Nos. 96-1653, 97-0321. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 5, 1997. Clarification and Rehearing Denied December 12, 1997. *895 Nancy Little Hoffmann of Nancy Little Hoffman
O'Dell v. Republic Bank-Medical Centerpublic domain
Plaintiff Paul R. O'Dell, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, Republic Bank-Medical Center. O'Dell executed an Installment Note and Security Agreement with Southwest National Bank in the sum of $1,066.05, granting the bank a security interest in his 1973 Dodge one-half ton pickup truck. The instrument was signed on July 30, 1979. On March 5, 1980, the Bank notified O'Dell by letter that his vehicle had been repossessed by the Bank, and he could redeem it by paying $739.50 b
Lewis v. Taylorpublic domain
In re Taylor, Mary Ann; O’Dell, Robert; —Defendants; Applying for Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 21017-CA; Parish of DeSoto 11th Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number 45,696. Prior report: 554 So.2d 158. Denied. DENNIS and COLE, JJ., would grant to consider whether the court of appeal’s judgment should be amended to provide that custody sh