Cases

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, P.J.A.D. Plaintiff Trump Plaza Associates, d/b/a Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino (Trump), appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint against defendant Meridian Bank, New Jersey (Meridi*116an). In its complaint, Trump alleges that Meridian unlawfully stopped payment on a personal money orde

05-24-00275-CV FILED JOHN F. WARREN COUHTY CLERK DALLAS COUNTY. TEXAS

347 B.R. 418 (2006) In re Takk Harold KERST, Debtor. M. Stephen Peters, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Takk Harold Kerst, Plaintiff, v. Wray State Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-28708 — HRT, Adversary No. 05-1807 HRT. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. August 8, 2006. *419 Theodore P. Demos, De

Case: 22-1822 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 03/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LESLIE BOYER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1822 ______________________ Appeal from the United

Case: 22-1822 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 03/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LESLIE BOYER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1822 ______________________ Appeal from the United

Mark E. Walker, Chief United States District Judge Here we are again. The clock hits 6:00 a.m. Sonny and Cher's "I Got You Babe" starts playing. Denizens of and visitors to Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania eagerly await the groundhog's prediction. And the state of Florida is alleged to violate federal law in its handling of elections.2 Puerto Ricans are American citizens. Unique among American

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

191 F.Supp.2d 1128 (2000) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Dianne B. GILES, Plaintiff, v. Lyle SARDIE, an individual, Evan Martinez, an individual; Willie Dixon, an individual; Gregory Dixon, an individual; Wallace Kent, an individual; Sam Okike, an individual; David Lee Weems, an individual; ABC Demolition, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; ACE Industries, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; Cal West Demo, a Business Entity of Un

2024 IL App (1st) 231469 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION June 11, 2024 No. 1-23-1469 REGINA ROCHA, ) Appeal from the )

HUMPHREY, J. [¶ 1] This appeal challenges a court’s findings and conclusions resulting from its application of the test for establishing de facto parenthood that we enunciated in Pitts v. Moore, 2014 ME 59, ¶¶ 27-30, 90 A.3d 1169. Under the Pitts test, “To obtain parental rights as a de facto parent, an individual must show that (1) ‘he or s

191 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2000) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Dianne B. GILES, Plaintiff, v. Lyle SARDIE, an individual, Evan Martinez, an individual; Willie Dixon, an individual; Gregory Dixon, an individual; Wallace Kent, an individual; Sam Okike, an individual; David Lee Weems, an individual; ABC Demolition, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; ACE Industries, a Business Entity of Unknown Legal Status; Cal West Demo, a Business Entity of Un

*101 BARBERA, C.J. Claudia Natalie Cabrera, Appellant before this Court, wished to seek the nomination of the Maryland Democratic Party for the office of delegate in the June 2014 gubernatorial primary election. When Appellant tendered for filing the certific

USCA11 Case: 23-13360 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 10/24/2024 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13360 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

ERVIN, Justice. **138In this case, we are called upon to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred by determining that the trial court did not err by refusing to grant a new trial to a defendant who was held liable pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 78A-56(a)(2), which prohibits a person from selling securities by means of false and misleading statements o

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WYNN and Judge FLOYD joined. PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: Musician Devin Copeland (“Copeland”), together with his songwriting partner, appeals the dismissal of his copyright infringement claim against recording artists Justin Bieber and Usher Raymond IV. Copeland alle

May 21, 2024 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 349 Conn. 67 MAY, 2024 67 Markley v. State Elections Enforcement Commission JOE MARKLEY ET AL. v. STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION (SC 20726) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, Mullins, Ecker and Alexander, Js.

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 1 Tax Equity Now NY LLC, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents, State of New York et al., Respondents. Richard P. Bress, for appellant.