Cases

SUSIE MORGAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *793Before the Court is Defendants Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals ("DHH"), Darlene Warren Smith, and Devin George's (collectively "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Deneen Montgomery-Smith's Second Supplemental and Amending Complaint.1 The motion is op

FILED JULY 8, 2021 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE COLTON and CHERYL BEHR,

592 N.W.2d 457 (1999) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kenneth Lamont DAVIS, Jr., petitioner, Appellant. No. C0-98-1572. Supreme Court of Minnesota. May 13, 1999. *458 James T. Hankes, Chief Public Defender, Barbara Deneen, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant. Michael A. Hatch, Minnesota Attorney General,

465 S.E.2d 366 (1995) STRINGER OIL CO., INC., Respondent, v. Alton BOBO, d/b/a Powdersville Exxon Station, Appellant. No. 2396. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard September 13, 1995. Decided October 16, 1995. Rehearing Denied January 9, 1996. *368 S. Jahue Moore, of Kirkland, Wilson, Moore

439 S.E.2d 838 (1994) RECCO TAPE AND LABEL COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. John R. BARFIELD and John W. Etters, Of Whom John R. Barfield is Appellant. No. 23979. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 2, 1993. Decided January 10, 1994. *839 Patrick J. Frawley, of Bouknight, Nicholson, Davis, Frawley &a;

293 S.C. 442 (1987) 361 S.E.2d 343 BATESBURG-LEESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 3, Appellant-Respondent v. Annie B. TARRANT, C.C. Alexander, Calbraith Butler Bates, Julia B. Wright, Moses Alexander, Lizzie A. Martin, Kate Alexander; Mary A. Alexander, Frances A. Crosley, Velmah A. Price, Sylvia A. Crosby, Katherine A. Mims, William Tarrant, Nancy Hutto; Fred L. Cartledge, Jr., Doris Cobb, Patsy Goodwin, Beth Leaptrott, Anne

108 F.2d 475 (1939) UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON. No. 6896. Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. December 18, 1939. *476 James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Norman D. Keller, and O. W. Hammonds, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and William J. Campbell, U. S. Atty., of Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Robert Ash, of Wash

Mr. Justice Gridley delivered the opinion of the court.

Mr. Justice Scanlan delivered the opinion of the court.

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 30 2000

UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. W&O, INC., d.b.a. Rustic Inn, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 98-5515, 98-5646. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 30, 2000. Appeals from th

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Before this court are two consolidated appeals arising from the Pregnancy Discrimination Act case brought by Plaintiff-Appellee United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) on behalf of a class of employees of Defen-danh-Appellant W&O, Inc., doing business as Rustic Inn (‘W&O”). In the first appeal, No. 98-5515, W&O appeals the jury award of punitive damages to the employee

Mr. Justice Waterman delivered' the opinion of the court. Appellant says, “ The main question for the consideration of the court is whether or not appellees can recover upon a contract which is in violation of the ordinances of the city of Chicago. Such ordinances are as binding upon all the parties, as if they were a matter of statutory regulation.” And “ The

Opinion by JUDGE FOX ¶ 1 Mary Beth Wheeler, personal representative of the Estate of David Wheeler,1 appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Tower Building, LLC and Lorraine E. Ring (collectively Landlord). The trial court held that the lease for use of Landlord's building created an enforceable security interest in David's personal property, which was located in his jewelry store when he

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decree of the superior court of Cook County dismissing their complaint by which they sought to enjoin the operation of a tavern by the defendants on property which adjoins that owned by the plaintiffs. The trial court has certified that this case involves the validity of a municipal ordinance and that public interest requires an appeal to be taken directly to this court. By their complaint for injunction plaintiffs sought to enjoin the operati

2020 WI App 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP548-CR † Petition for Review filed Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. KEITH C. HENYARD, DEFENDA

SEILER, Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to support the conviction. By amended information based on Sec. 559.180, V.A.M.S., it was charged that defendant “ * * * upon one John Matosich, did make an assault; * * and of his malice aforethought, did strike and beat with his hands; the said John Ma-tosich, with the felonious intent the money of the said John Matosich * * * by force

227 F.Supp.2d 721 (2002) GRAND RAPIDS AUTO SALES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MBNA AMERICA BANK, National Association, Defendant. Case No. 1:01-CV-660. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 24, 2002. *722 John E. Anding, Christopher G. Hastings, Drew, Cooper & Anding, Charles S. Rominger, Dilley & R

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1738 ___________ Jolonda Roberts, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for t

528 F.3d 1123 (2008) Jolonda ROBERTS, Appellant, v. PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES; Park Nicollet Clinic; Health-System Minnesota, Appellees. No. 07-1738. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 14, 2007. Filed: June 24, 2008. *1124 Steven Andrew Smith, argued, Robert L. Schug, on the b