⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Denise B Meekins”

Superior Court of Delaware · 2025-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DENISE M. LANGFORD ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ISAIAS IRGAU, M.D., ) C.A. No. N24C-09-184 DJB CHRISTIANA INSTITUTE ) OF ADVANCED SURGERY, P.A., ) JEFFREY P. CRAMER, M.D., ) AND DELAWARE FAMILY CARE ) ASSOCIATES, P.A. ) ) Defendants. )
Lampson v. Lampsonpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997-10-17 · Published · cited 0× · 950 P.2d 888; 1997 OK CIV APP 71; 68 O.B.A.J. 3909; 1997 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 74
MEMORANDUM OPINION CARL B. JONES, Presiding Judge: ¶ 1 Appellants, the natural parents of J.L. and E.L., appeal from three separate orders. They appeal from the separate adoption decrees of J.L. and E.L. and from an order denying a motion that, in effect, sought to vacate a 1988 order terminating their parental rights to J.L. and E.L. ¶2 Appellees are the natural grandparents of J.L. a
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988-03-01 · Published · cited 3× · 89 N.C. App. 1; 365 S.E.2d 312; 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 230
PARKER, Judge. The sole issue presented for review by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs contend that the Industrial Commission does not have exclusive jurisdiction over their claims, and that said claims are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the superior court. Plaintiffs further argue that the superior court must assert
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980-05-06 · Published · cited 0× · 46 N.C. App. 472; 265 S.E.2d 497; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2875
HILL, Judge. Four questions are submitted to this Court for review. Although all appear to merit consideration, we conclude another issue is dispositive of the case at this time: Can an insurance company exercise sole discretion in accepting or refusing a proof of loss tendered under the provisions of the policy. We think not. The plaintiff appellant in his complaint alleged:
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003-06-12 · Published · cited 11× · 332 F.3d 698; 2003 WL 21357305
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge LUTTIG joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This is the second appeal by James and Rebecca Deaton, who were sued by the government under the Clean Water Act (sometimes, “the CWA” or “the Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., for failing to obtain a
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988-03-01 · Published · cited 6× · 365 S.E.2d 312
365 S.E.2d 312 (1988) NORTH CAROLINA CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Dr. Robert Hay, Dr. Fletcher G. Keith, Dr. John T. Tierney, Dr. Dean R. Kenny, Dr. Joe Case, Dr. Phillip Van Campen, Dr. Gary Dackor, Dr. James Watkins and Dr. Joseph Duffy v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., Amerisure Insurance Co., Crawford & Company, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., the Home Insurance Co., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., the Shelby Mutual Insurance Co
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985-06-25 · Published · cited 45× · 765 F.2d 604; 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 900
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. The appellants seek reversal of the district court’s order dismissing their complaints for failure to comply with the court’s discovery orders. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. In these consolidated actions, the plaintiffs seek damages from the defendants for injuries allegedly suffered from alleged exposure to radiation and other metal toxicity while employed
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003-06-12 · Published · cited 18× · 332 F.3d 698; 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20223; 56 ERC (BNA) 1641; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11642
332 F.3d 698 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James S. DEATON; Rebecca Deaton, Defendants-Appellants,The Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Incorporated; State of Maryland, Department of the Environment, Amici Supporting Appellee. No. 02-1442. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 5, 2002. Decided: June 12,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985-06-25 · Published · cited 33× · 765 F.2d 604; 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 900; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20036
765 F.2d 604 2 Fed.R.Serv.3d 900 William PATTON, Administrator of Estate of Albert Patton,Vincent Mango, Paul Franklin Pierson, Grady Mickey Lenoir,Raymond Wesley Houston, Danny Jones, John Inello, Paul JohnHasko, Ted Walker, Charles Carson, Darrell Black, ClintonRollins, Terry Hensley, Vernon Adams, Frank Gillespie,Jessie Cable, James Rodeback, Joseph M. Murphy, James Roble,Charles Earhart, Jess