⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Denise Hamilton”

Hamilton v. Rheepublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-18 · Published · cited 2× · 770 F. Supp. 2d 241; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28130; 2011 WL 938734
770 F.Supp.2d 241 (2011) Denise HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. Michelle RHEE et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0585 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 18, 2011. *242 Denise Hamilton, Takoma Park, MD, pro se. Esther Yong, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, D
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-05-24 · Published · cited 206× · 681 F.3d 888; 88 Fed. R. Serv. 631; 2012 WL 1871855; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10471; 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,510; 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 81
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. In most employment discrimination cases that arise in the private sector, the defendants are the employers themselves, most often corporations or other business organizations. In this case of alleged race discrimination and retaliation, however, the employer has gone through bankruptcy and so cannot be sued for relief. The plaintiff in this case has sought
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-05-06 · Published · cited 2× · 215 F.R.D. 460; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7743; 2003 WL 21047588
DECISION AND ORDER MARRERO, District Judge. Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. (“DIRECTV”) brought this action alleging theft or satellite transmission in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1), 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. A default judgment was entered against defendants Denise Hamilton and Majmud Salej on September 23, 2002 by the Honorable Allen G. Schwartz, who then referred the matter t
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-01-06 · Published · cited 871× · 667 F.3d 835; 2012 WL 32062; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 241; 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,384; 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 160
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. In 2006, the United States Postal Service terminated plaintiff Denise Coleman’s 32 years of employment as a mail process *841 ing clerk. The Postal Service contends that it fired Coleman because she told her psychiatrist she was having thoughts of killing her supervisor, and
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014-07-08 · Published · cited 3× · 54 F. Supp. 3d 929; 2014 WL 3107961; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92170
OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge This suit involves the crash of a commuter airplane in Queensland, Australia in May of 2005 that killed all fifteen individuals onboard. Plaintiffs, as administrators and special administrators of the estates of fourteen of the deceased, sued Defendants for their alleged roles in the crash. Defendants seek summary judgment via four se
District Court, D. Montana · 2006-11-16 · Published · cited 2× · 465 F. Supp. 2d 1060; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86112; 2006 WL 3335583
465 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2006) Joe HAMILTON, Denise Hamilton, and Joseph ("Zack") Hamilton, Plaintiffs, v. TRINITY UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Unitrin Property and Casualty Insurance Group, Defendants. No. CV 06-72-M-DWM. United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division. November 16, 2006. *1061 Paul A. Sandry, Johnson
Hamilton v. Dineenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001-08-29 · Published · cited 2× · 17 F. App'x 7
PER CURIAM. Appellant Michael A. Hamilton filed a complaint in the Massachusetts federal district court and asked to proceed in for-ma pauperis. His complaint attacked state court proceedings which had resulted in the loss of custody of his three children. After granting IFP status, the district court dismissed the complaint on the gr
Johnson v. Hamiltonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-07-05 · Published · cited 143× · 452 F.3d 967; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16767
452 F.3d 967 Timothy JOHNSON, Appellant,v.Martha HAMILTON; Dr. Jacques Lamour; Jane Doe, (Sarah), Nurse; David Dormire; Gary B. Kempker; Lisa Jones; Joseph Jay Cassady, Constituent Service Assistant; Bowen Clifton, FUM 5-C; Charlie Verdugo, CCW 5-C; Bill Galloway, Assistant Superintendent; Marian Ortbals, FUM; ElmerWankum, FUM; Arthur Woods, Associate Superintendent; Susie Akers, Nurse; R. Bainbridge, CCA; Stanley Keeley, CCA; Robert Wa
Hamilton v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000-05-03 · Published · cited 0× · 756 So. 2d 1098; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280; 2000 WL 526003
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw this court’s opinion of March 15, 2000, and substitute the following in its place. Appellant challenges his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines on the ground that chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. The dat
In re Estate of Orrpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2019-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 124 N.E.3d 513; 429 Ill. Dec. 317
Petition for Leave to Appeal Denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 452 F.3d 967
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1453 ___________ Timothy Johnson, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Martha Hamilt
District Court, E.D. New York · 1999-01-22 · Published · cited 23× · 47 F. Supp. 2d 330; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2179; 1999 WL 167672
47 F.Supp.2d 330 (1999) Freddie HAMILTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCU-TEK, et al., Defendants. No. CV-95-0049 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 22, 1999. *331 *332 Elisa Barnes, New York, NY, Weitz & Luxenberg, New York, NY, By Denise M. Dunleavy, Schulte Roth &am;
District Court, E.D. New York · 1999-06-03 · Published · cited 26× · 62 F. Supp. 2d 802; 1999 WL 363022; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8264
62 F.Supp.2d 802 (1999) Freddie HAMILTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCU-TEK, et al., Defendants. No. CV-95-0049 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 3, 1999. *803 *804 *805 *806 Elisa Barnes, Weitz &
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 25× · 885 F.3d 1065
Flaum, Circuit Judge. *1069 Appellee Denise L. Blake is a below-median income debtor who filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. In her proposed bankruptcy plan, Blake sought to retain her annual earned income tax credit and a portion of her tax over-withholdings. Trustee Marilyn O. Marshall ob
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1997-03-05 · Published · cited 8× · 21 F. Supp. 2d 700; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22974; 1997 WL 1042597
21 F.Supp.2d 700 (1997) MAS-HAMILTON GROUP, Plaintiff, v. LaGARD, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. A. 94-349. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky. March 5, 1997. *701 *702 *703 *704 *705
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-01-19 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D20-1260 & 3D20-1473 Lower Tribunal No. 14-30380 ________________ Denise Riano, et al., Appellants,
Hamilton v. Rheepublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENISE HAMILTON, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 10-0585 (RMU) : v. : Re Document No.: 3 : MICHE
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2809 MARILYN O. MARSHALL, Trustee‐Appellant, v. DENISE L. BLAKE, Debtor‐Appellee. ____________________
New York Court of Appeals · 2001-04-26 · Published · cited 678× · 750 N.E.2d 1055; 96 N.Y.2d 222; 727 N.Y.S.2d 7; 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 946
96 N.Y.2d 222 (2001) 750 N.E.2d 1055 727 N.Y.S.2d 7 FREDDIE HAMILTON et al., Plaintiffs, and GAIL Fox et al., Respondents, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued February 8, 2001. Decided April 26, 2001. *224
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
08/19/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 3, 2019 JEREMY PAUL BARMMER v. JOY DENISE STAININGER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 2016-CV-288-I Carter Scott Moore, Judge No. E2018-02058-COA-R3-CV