Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Denise Hamilton”
Hamilton v. Rheepublic domain
770 F.Supp.2d 241 (2011) Denise HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. Michelle RHEE et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0585 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 18, 2011. *242 Denise Hamilton, Takoma Park, MD, pro se. Esther Yong, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, D
Darrel Smith v. Denise Braypublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. In most employment discrimination cases that arise in the private sector, the defendants are the employers themselves, most often corporations or other business organizations. In this case of alleged race discrimination and retaliation, however, the employer has gone through bankruptcy and so cannot be sued for relief. The plaintiff in this case has sought
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Hamiltonpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER MARRERO, District Judge. Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. (“DIRECTV”) brought this action alleging theft or satellite transmission in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1), 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. A default judgment was entered against defendants Denise Hamilton and Majmud Salej on September 23, 2002 by the Honorable Allen G. Schwartz, who then referred the matter t
Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. Donahopublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. In 2006, the United States Postal Service terminated plaintiff Denise Coleman’s 32 years of employment as a mail process *841 ing clerk. The Postal Service contends that it fired Coleman because she told her psychiatrist she was having thoughts of killing her supervisor, and
Thornton v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge This suit involves the crash of a commuter airplane in Queensland, Australia in May of 2005 that killed all fifteen individuals onboard. Plaintiffs, as administrators and special administrators of the estates of fourteen of the deceased, sued Defendants for their alleged roles in the crash. Defendants seek summary judgment via four se
Hamilton v. Trinity Universal Insurancepublic domain
465 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2006) Joe HAMILTON, Denise Hamilton, and Joseph ("Zack") Hamilton, Plaintiffs, v. TRINITY UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Unitrin Property and Casualty Insurance Group, Defendants. No. CV 06-72-M-DWM. United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division. November 16, 2006. *1061 Paul A. Sandry, Johnson
Hamilton v. Dineenpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant Michael A. Hamilton filed a complaint in the Massachusetts federal district court and asked to proceed in for-ma pauperis. His complaint attacked state court proceedings which had resulted in the loss of custody of his three children. After granting IFP status, the district court dismissed the complaint on the gr
Johnson v. Hamiltonpublic domain
452 F.3d 967 Timothy JOHNSON, Appellant,v.Martha HAMILTON; Dr. Jacques Lamour; Jane Doe, (Sarah), Nurse; David Dormire; Gary B. Kempker; Lisa Jones; Joseph Jay Cassady, Constituent Service Assistant; Bowen Clifton, FUM 5-C; Charlie Verdugo, CCW 5-C; Bill Galloway, Assistant Superintendent; Marian Ortbals, FUM; ElmerWankum, FUM; Arthur Woods, Associate Superintendent; Susie Akers, Nurse; R. Bainbridge, CCA; Stanley Keeley, CCA; Robert Wa
Hamilton v. Statepublic domain
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw this court’s opinion of March 15, 2000, and substitute the following in its place. Appellant challenges his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines on the ground that chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. The dat
In re Estate of Orrpublic domain
Petition for Leave to Appeal Denied.
Timothy Johnson v. Martha Hamilton etc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1453 ___________ Timothy Johnson, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Martha Hamilt
Hamilton v. Accu-Tekpublic domain
47 F.Supp.2d 330 (1999) Freddie HAMILTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCU-TEK, et al., Defendants. No. CV-95-0049 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 22, 1999. *331 *332 Elisa Barnes, New York, NY, Weitz & Luxenberg, New York, NY, By Denise M. Dunleavy, Schulte Roth &am;
Hamilton v. Accu-Tekpublic domain
62 F.Supp.2d 802 (1999) Freddie HAMILTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCU-TEK, et al., Defendants. No. CV-95-0049 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 3, 1999. *803 *804 *805 *806 Elisa Barnes, Weitz &
Marilyn Marshall v. Denise Blakepublic domain
Flaum, Circuit Judge. *1069 Appellee Denise L. Blake is a below-median income debtor who filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. In her proposed bankruptcy plan, Blake sought to retain her annual earned income tax credit and a portion of her tax over-withholdings. Trustee Marilyn O. Marshall ob
Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc.public domain
21 F.Supp.2d 700 (1997) MAS-HAMILTON GROUP, Plaintiff, v. LaGARD, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. A. 94-349. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky. March 5, 1997. *701 *702 *703 *704 *705
DENISE RIANO v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D20-1260 & 3D20-1473 Lower Tribunal No. 14-30380 ________________ Denise Riano, et al., Appellants,
Hamilton v. Rheepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENISE HAMILTON, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 10-0585 (RMU) : v. : Re Document No.: 3 : MICHE
Marilyn Marshall v. Denise Blakepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2809 MARILYN O. MARSHALL, Trustee‐Appellant, v. DENISE L. BLAKE, Debtor‐Appellee. ____________________
Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.public domain
96 N.Y.2d 222 (2001) 750 N.E.2d 1055 727 N.Y.S.2d 7 FREDDIE HAMILTON et al., Plaintiffs, and GAIL Fox et al., Respondents, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued February 8, 2001. Decided April 26, 2001. *224
Jeremy Paul Barmmer v. Joy Denise Stainingerpublic domain
08/19/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 3, 2019 JEREMY PAUL BARMMER v. JOY DENISE STAININGER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 2016-CV-288-I Carter Scott Moore, Judge No. E2018-02058-COA-R3-CV