Cases

05/21/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 21, 2019 Session JASMINE DESIREE WIGHTMAN v. JOSHUA CHARLES WIGHTMAN Appeal from the Probate Court for Cumberland County No. 2018-PF-6114 Larry Michael Warner, Judge ___________________________________

958 F.2d 127 1992 A.M.C. 2028, 60 USLW 2697 David W. MURRAY, Individually and as Administrator of theEstates of his minor children Desiree Murray,David W. Murray, Jr., Darry ScottMurray, and Sally W. Murray,Plaintiffs-Appellants,Sally W. Murray, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Appellee,v.ANTHONY J. BERTUCCI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., and PacificEmployers Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: This appeal asks us to consider, for the first time, whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Miles v. Apex Marine Corp., — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 317, 112 L.Ed.2d 275 (1990), bars the spouse of an injured seaman from recovering loss of society. Cross-appellants Anthony J. Bertucci Construction Company and Pacific Employers Insurance Company (collectively “Bertuc-ci”) contend that we should r

Per Curiam. *492 {¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended that we approve a consent decree proposed by relator, Ohio State Bar Association ("OSBA"), and respondent, Matthew Cohen. We accept the board's recomme

Per Curiam. *328 {¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended that we approve a consent decree proposed by relator, Ohio State Bar Association ("OSBA"), and respondent, John Ross. The parties have waived notice an

GEER, Judge. *86Defendant, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, appeals the superior court's denial of its motion to dismiss plaintiff Jillian Murray's complaint. Although acknowledging that this appeal is interlocutory, defendant argues that it is entitled to appeal because the trial court denied its motion to dismiss on sovereign imm

8 Cal.App.4th 286 (1992) 10 Cal. Rptr.2d 254 In re DESIREE B. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PHILIP B., JR., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. D015258. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. July 21, 1992.

Per Curiam. Defendant appeals as of right his jury trial convictions of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon (felonious assault), MCL 750.82, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (felony-firearm), *319MCL 750.227b. The trial court sentenced defendant to concurrent prison terms of 15 to 30 years for kidnapping and

99 P.3d 379 (2004) 2004 UT App 310 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 382, an unincorporated labor organization; and Caroline Jolley-Christensen, an individual, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a Utah incorporated special transit district, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020764-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. September 10, 2004. <

| iLANDRIEU, Judge, concurring. The facts of this case are distinguishable from the facts in Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, et al., 475 So.2d 1040 (La.1985) and Moore v. Gencorp, Inc., 633 So.2d 1268 (La.1994). Here, the Goodman claimants assert no claim in reconvention against Jeansonne or his insurer for the death of Goodman, having settled those claims be

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA LEO CONO, A/K/A CONO, No. 80007 Appellant, vs. WILLIAM PELHAM BARR; AARON DARNELL. FORD; DONALD W. WASHINGTON; STEVEN B. FILED WOLFSON; GARY G. SCHOFIELD; REBECCA SALAZAR; KEVIN VEREEN; :1: DEC 2 4 231

OPINION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY BACKGROUND BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge. We address here defendant C.R. Bard’s motion to compel (1) disclosure of communications between inventors and their patent counsel made in anticipation of filing the application of the patent in issue and (2) testimony by inventors and their patent counsel setting forth directly their underst

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 91–3044. David W. MURRAY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estates of his minor children Desiree Murray, David W. Murray, Jr., Darry Scott Murray, and Sally W. Murray, Plaintiffs–Appellants, Sally W. Murray, Plaintiff–Appellant Cross–Appellee,

Appellant appeals from a jury conviction for the misdemeanor offense of solicitation of prostitution on August 5, 1979. At issue is whether the trial court erred in overruling a pre-trial motion to quash the information. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Appellant's ground of error asserts that the trial court erroneously overruled her pre-trial motion to quash the information because the information was overbroad, lacked particulars of the offense for which she had be

Opinion MURRAY, J. In this case, we address the issue of whether a party, by not objecting in the trial court, forfeits an objection to the failure to follow procedures related to an alternative permanent plan for Indian children established by the Legislature—tribal customary adoption—which became operative on July 1, 2010. (Stats. 2009, ch. 287, § 12.) </

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERT H. ROBINSON, JR. Sussex County Courthouse JUDGE 1 The Circle, Suite 2 Georgetown, DE 19947 Telephone: (302) 856-526

JUDGMENT CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (D.E. 1) and the Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C, § 2255 (D.E. 2) filed by petitioner Wilfredo Feliciano-Rod-riguez, the United States’ Response in Op*210position (D.E.

STATE OF LOUISIANA IN * NO. 2020-CA-0075 THE INTEREST OF C.B. * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

OPINION OF THE COURT RESTREPO, Circuit Judge. Deportable immigrants are presumptively exempt from the discretionary imposition of supervised release under Section 5Dl.l(c) of the Sentencing Guidelines. Appellant Francisco Azcona-Polanco, a de-portable immigrant, argues that the District Court committed a procedural sentencing error by sentencing him to a ter

952 So.2d 744 (2007) TIGER HO, L.L.C. v. Emile P. DiGIOVANNI d/b/a DiGiovanni's Insulation & Refractory, Inc. and Honorable Desiree M. Charbonnet, Recorder of Mortgages. No. 2006-CA-0909. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. January 31, 2007. *745 Edward J. McCloskey, McCloskey & Langenstein, L.L.P., New Orleans,