Cases

Garry, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 22, 2011, which ruled that claimant had involuntarily retired. Claimant, a heavy truck mechanic and equipment operator, successfully applied for workers’ compensation benefits after he injured his back while swinging a sledgehammer. He required back surgery for his condition in 2009 and missed several months of work, but returned

Garry, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 22, 2011, which ruled that claimant had involuntarily retired. Claimant, a heavy truck mechanic and equipment operator, successfully applied for workers’ compensation benefits after he injured his back while swinging a sledgehammer. He required back surgery for his condition in 2009 and missed several months of work, but returned

159 S.W.3d 298 (2004) 357 Ark. 10 Benny GONZALES, et al. v. CITY of DeWITT. No. 03-936. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 15, 2004. *299 Montgomery, Adams & Wyatt, PLC, by: Orin Eddy Montgomery, Little Rock, for appellants. Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C., by: L. Oneal Sutter, Little Rock, for app

73 F.Supp.2d 589 (1999) Donna DEWITT, Plaintiff, v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a corporate governmental unit organized pursuant to the laws of North Carolina, and R. Wayne Weston, individually and in his capacity as Director of the Parks and Recreation Department of defendant Mecklenburg County as well as an agent of defendant Mecklenburg County, Defendants. No. Civ. 3:97CV579-H. United States District Court,

701 F.Supp.2d 749 (2010) Joseph ANTONIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. AW-05-2982. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. March 31, 2010. *754 Allison Walsh Sheedy, Charles William Frick, Donald Paul Amlin, Joseph Decker,

685 S.E.2d 135 (2009) The ESTATE OF Kenneth L. WILSON and Doris Wilson, in her capacity as the Administratrix of the Estate of Kenneth L. Wilson, Petitioners, v. DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES and Division of Medical Assistance of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Respondents. No. COA09-216. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 3, 2009. <

31 So.3d 756 (2010) In re AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.420 AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. No. SC07-2050. Supreme Court of Florida. March 18, 2010. Judge Lisa Davidson, Chair, Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Viera, FL, Scott M. Dimond, Past Chair, Miami, FL; John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Di

16 Ariz. App. 305 (1972) 492 P.2d 1243 L. Waldo DEWITT et al., Appellants, v. MAGMA COPPER COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Appellee. No. 2 CA-CIV 1030. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. January 27, 1972. Rehearing Denied March 13, 1972. Review Denied April 11, 1972. *306<

361 F.2d 50 DeWitt EASTER, Appellant,v.DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 19365. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued January 19, 1966. Decided March 31, 1966. Messrs. Peter Barton Hutt and Michael S. Horne, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Monroe H. Free

149 Mich. App. 749 (1986) 386 N.W.2d 663 KENT COUNTY v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Docket No. 81792. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 17, 1986. Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett (by Judy E. Bregman), for plaintiff. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Willia

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. In this case, brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, we must decide whether the benefits at issue are retirement benefits or disability benefits. Dennis Arndt worked for Security Bank from 1967, when he was 20 years old, until 1990, when as a result of an automobile accident h

560 F.2d 347 Dewitt D. HUMPHREVILLE, Appellee,v.F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education andWelfare, Appellant.Paul T. JAMES, Appellee,v.F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education andWelfare, Appellant.Clarence L. BRINEY, Appellee,v.F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education andWelfare, Appellant. Nos. 76-1875, 76-1884 and 76-1920. Uni

Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 20 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. Plaintiff Alonzo Phillips suffers from a variety of impairments and believes that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) err

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, affirmed. The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the district court affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for parent’s benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Our task on this appeal is to review the administrative record to determine wh

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, a former laborer, applied for social security disability benefits, claiming to be unable to work a full 40-hour week because of acute lower back pain that radiates into his right leg. He has had a variety of treatments and takes *760 a number of medications such

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH M. HOOD, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon cross-motions for Summary Judgment [D.E. 13, 14] on Plaintiff’s appeal of the Commissioner’s denial of his application for disability and disability insurance benefits. [Tr. 9-25].1 The Court, having reviewed the record and being otherwise sufficiently advised, will deny Pl

789 F.Supp.2d 470 (2011) Annemarie BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Michael ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Civ. No. 10-042-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 19, 2011. *474 Gary L. Smith, Esquire of Newark, DE, for Plaintiff. David C. Weiss, Esquire, United States Attorney and Patrici

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MILTON L. SCHWARTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment brought by the parties under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The underlying action is one in which plaintiffs, State of California, County of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, bring suit against the Secretary of Health and Human Servi

ORDER YVETTE KANE, District Judge, United States District Court Before the Court in the above captioned action is a December 30, 2015 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Defendant waived the opportunity to file objections (Doc. No. 17). ACCORDINGLY, this 13th day of January 2016, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The Cour

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This is an action to review the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security *1183(“Commissioner”) denying the claimant Stephanie L. Guerra’s applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”) an