⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-01-03 · Published · cited 3× · 89 F.4th 1370
Case: 23-1795 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 01/03/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DEXCOM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ABBOTT DIABETES CARE, INC., ABBOTT DIABETES CARE SALES CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1795 ____________________
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 31× · 696 F.3d 1142; 104 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1337; 2012 WL 4465236; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20373
PROST, Circuit Judge. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. (“Abbott”) appeals from ex parte reexamination proceedings in which the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) rejected numerous claims of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,175,752 (“'752 patent”) and 6,565,-509 (“'509 patent”). Ex parte Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., No. 2010-006873, 2011 WL 180171 (B.P.A.I. Jan.
District Court, D. Delaware · 2009-03-30 · Published · cited 45× · 609 F. Supp. 2d 353; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25776; 2009 WL 824688
609 F.Supp.2d 353 (2009) SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Wireless Valley Comm., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ARUBA NETWORKS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-519-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 30, 2009. *355 Eric J. Lobenfeld, Esquire; Ira J. Schaefer, Esquire; Lawrence V. Brocchini, Esquire; Mitchell S. Feller,
District Court, D. Delaware · 2012-03-30 · Published · cited 12× · 852 F. Supp. 2d 493; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45351; 2012 WL 1118633
MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, District Judge: Pending before the ■ Court are: (1) a Motion to Dismiss, or alternatively, to Strike the Third Party Complaint (D.I. 16),1 filed by putative third party defendants Noam Danenberg, Just4Fit Israel, Ltd., Mavidex Ltd. d/b/a Blue Bird Surf & Urban, and Ofer Michalovski (collectively, “TP Defendants”); and (2) a Motion to Co
District Court, D. Delaware · 2012-10-09 · Published · cited 24× · 902 F. Supp. 2d 503; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145559; 2012 WL 4801890
MEMORANDUM ORDER CHRISTOPHER J. BURKE, United States Magistrate Judge. In this action, Plaintiff Ever Win International Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “Ever Win”) has filed a Complaint alleging patent infringement against Defendant Radio Shack Corporation (“Defendant” or “Radio Shack”). (D.I. 1) Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination of the
District Court, D. Delaware · 2013-02-05 · Published · cited 20× · 922 F. Supp. 2d 486; 2013 WL 443973
OPINION SLEET, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On June 20, 2012, the plaintiff, Market-Alerts Pry. Ltd. (“Markeb-Alerts”), *488brought the above-captioned six lawsuits against multiple defendants,1 alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,941,357 (the “'357 Patent”). On October 15, 2012, se
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2026-07-06 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 25-1956 Filed: June 24, 2026 Reissued: July 6, 2026 † THE TOOTA GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Patrick S. Angulo, Trial Attorney, William J. Grimaldi, Assistant Dire