Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Diamond X Ranch, LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Company”
Diamond X Ranch, LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.public domain
ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. I. SUMMARY Before the Court is Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company’s Motion to Dismiss the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Claims (dkt. no. 27) (“the Motion”). The *1017Court has also reviewed Plaintiff Diamond X Ranch, LLC’s opposition (dkt. no. 31), and Defendant’s reply (dkt. no. 4
Glencove Holdings, LLC v. Steven Bloompublic domain
BAP Appeal No. 20-43 Docket No. 68 Filed: 12/02/2021 Page: 1 of 58 PUBLISH UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ IN RE STEVEN W. BLOOM, BAP No. CO-20-043 Debtor. _________________________________ GLENCOVE HOLDINGS, LLC, Bankr. No
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.public domain
WALTER H. RICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant *891Valley Asphalt Corporation's Amended Counterclaim, Doc. # 794, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant The Dayton Power & Light Company's Amended Counterclaim, Doc. # 798. I. Bac
United States v. P.R. Indus. Dev. Co.public domain
BESOSA, District Judge. *137On September 25, 2015 the United States of America ("United States") filed a complaint against the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company ("PRIDCO") pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"),
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.public domain
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 252, "Motion"), filed by plaintiff United States of America (the "government"), the court finds that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78 ; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass'n,
Wooley v. Lucksingerpublic domain
14 So.3d 311 (2008) J. Robert WOOLEY, As Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana v. Thomas S. LUCKSINGER, Michael D. Nadler, Stephen J. Nazarenus, Scott Westbrook, Michael K. Jhin, William F. Galtney, John P. Mudd, Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., Executive Risk Management Associates, Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Executive Liability Underwriters and Greenwich Insurance Co., AmCareco, Inc., AmCare Management, Inc. J. Rob
ACCEPTED 04-14-00807-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/19/2015 3:55:18
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS